Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

THE INFLUENCE OF WORK MOTIVATION AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY WHICH IMPLICATIONS ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT PT. FUKUSUKE KOGYO INDONESIA Rahmat Hidayat; Tedi Tedi
Strategic Management Business Journal Vol. 3 No. 01 (2023): June 30, 2023
Publisher : UPMI Management

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55751/smbj.v3i01.69

Abstract

This study has a goal, namely the effect of work motivation and work environment on the productivity of employee performance. Primary data was obtained from the results of distributing questionnaires distributed to 137 employees, and secondary data was obtained from documentation. The sampling technique used is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the help of the Lisrel 8.8 application. The population in the study amounted to 137 employees and the sample in this study was 102. The results of the data analysis showed that work motivation and work environment partialy don’t have effect toward productivity, but work motivation and work environment give the influence toward performance. work motivation and work environment simultaneously had a positive and significant effect on the productivity of employee performance at PT Fukusuke Kogyo Indonesia.
Optimalisasi Line Balancing pada Proses Produksi PCB Line KMM-X704KN PT. XYZ Rahmat Hidayat; Tri Ngudi Wiyatno; Dwi Indra Prasetya
INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/insologi.v5i1.6879

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and balance the production line in the assembly process using two Line Balancing methods, namely Helgeson–Birnie (H-B) and the Largest Candidate Rule (LCR), with a cycle time (CT) set at 2.28 minutes (137 seconds) based on the manual bottleneck workstation. The total element work time was recorded at 19.39 minutes, with a minimum required number of 9 workstations. The calculation results from both methods showed consistent and identical solutions, yielding 10 actual workstations (N_actual = 10). The line performance achieved a Line Efficiency (LE) of 85.04% with a Balance Delay (BD) of 14.96%. Although this efficiency is considered good, idle time analysis revealed a total waste of 3.41 minutes, most of which occurred at Workstation 10, which operated for only 0.20 minutes. These findings indicate that improvements should focus on restructuring the final workstation to eliminate waste, increase LE, and streamline total element time to approach the Takt Time, thereby optimizing overall line performance. This study provides practical recommendations for production management to enhance productivity and the efficiency of the assembly line.