R. Herman Katimin
Universitas Galuh

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Restorative Justice Approach towards Termination Investigation of Begal Victims Based on Noodweer Action and Noodweer Exes Herman Katimin; Ida Farida
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 6, No 2 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (677.229 KB) | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v6i2.547

Abstract

In cases of involuntary manslaughters in self-defense by a victim of violent armed robberies (begal), investigators have often been reluctant to implement Article 49 of the Indonesian Criminal Code as a legal ground to terminate criminal investigations. The study aimed to analyze the termination of investigations based on noodweer and noodweerexces through a restorative justice approach. The study was descriptive and qualitative, employing a descriptive method. Data were collected from relevant literature and were analyzed quantitatively. The results showed that in the cases of involuntary manslaughter in self-defense by victims of violent armed robbery, the investigators had the authority to terminate the investigation and implement a restorative justice approach instead. It was applicable when the victims’ self-defense was void of mens rea, compelled by force, or done in defense of his or another person’s physical or sexual integrity or property against an immediate, unlawful attack. The restorative justice approach may involve the victims and/or their families, the perpetrators’ families, religious leaders, community leaders, traditional leaders, youth leaders, and other relevant stakeholders and is aimed solely for the sake of justice, legal usefulness, and legal certainty.
PENYALAHGUNAAN KEWENANGAN KEPALA DESA DALAM PENGELOLAAN DANA RETRIBUSI DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Farij Ihza Fadilah; Yat Rospia Brata; Herman Katimin
Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Case Law : Journal of Law | Juli 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v4i2.3265

Abstract

Korupsi masih masif di Indonesia yang berpengaruh terhadap kehidupan masyarakat. Pemberantasan korupsi hendaknya dilakukan serius, namun penegakan hukum belum mampu menangani tepat dengan penerapan pasal. Tidak hanya kerugian keuangan negara, melainkan perlu aspek ekonomi dan sosial, sehingga tidak memberikan keadian dan kepastian hukum. Perkara korupsi terkait kerugian keuangan negara pada pengelolaan dana retribusi obyek Wisata Situ Lengkong Panjalu Kabupaten Ciamis tahun 2015 sampai tahun 2018 dengan kerugian keuangan negara sebesar 2,24 miliar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analisis, pendekatan yuridis normatif melalui studi kepustakaan data sekunder. Peraturan perundang-undangan terkait tindak pidana korupsi, keuangan daerah, retribusi, putusan pengadilan dan teori hukum. Data pendukung berupa artikel ilmiah yang berkaitan dengan penyalahgunaan kewenangan dana retribusi dihubungan dengan tindak pidana korupsi. Hasil penelitian adalah kewenangan Kepala Desa Panjalu dalam pengelolaan dana retribusi telah ditegaskan dalam Perda No 12 tahun 2020 yaitu 60 % untuk pendapatan Pemda Ciamis dan 40 % Desa Panjalu akan tetapi selama periode 2015–2018 telah menyalagunakan kewenangannya secara melawan hukum sehingga terpenuhi Pasal 3 UUPTPK karena jabatannya dan bukan Pasal 2 UUPTPK. Selain itu, pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara sebesar Rp. 2,24 miliar tidak termasuk jumlah kerugian hak ekonomi dan sosial masyarakat Desa Panjalu.
Kerugian Keuangan Negara atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Herman Katimin
SASI Vol 26, No 1 (2020): Volume 26 Nomor 1, Januari - Maret 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210

Abstract

The difficulty of capital punishment for perpetrators of corruption, although there are several examples of corruption cases that have fulfilled certain elements of the conditions as Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 20 of 2002 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. To discuss this problem, the research method used is juridical normative relating to certain elements of the state and the amount of state financial losses or the state's economy in determining the death penalty. The results of the discussion included not explaining the specific elements of certain circumstances as a burden for corruptors. In addition, the amount of state financial losses or the country's economy is very important in determining the death penalty is not formulated in certain circumstances. Therefore, it is recommended that specific formulations of certain elements and the amount of state financial losses or state economies that reach billions of up to triulian rupiah be subject to the death penalty.
CRIMINALIZATION POLICY ON THE ACT OF MAKING, PRODUCING, AND TRADING ILLEGAL FISHING CAPTURE EQUIPMENT Farida, Ida; Katimin, Herman
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Number 2 March 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.950

Abstract

The widespread use of illegal fishing capture equipment in the form of drag nets and drag nets which harm and endanger the sustainability of fish resources and the environment in Indonesian waters, cannot be separated from the act of making, producing, and trading. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach which is qualitative in nature, where this research uses a normative approach with a sociological approach as support. Based on the results of the research, criminalizing the act of making, producing, and trading becomes a crime, formulated in article 85A, which reads "Whoever deliberately brings, produces and trades illegal fishing equipment or illegal fishing aids that are not in accordance with the provisions referred to in Article 7 shall be punished with a maximum fine of Rp. 250,000,000.00 (two hundred and fifty million rupiah)”. So that law enforcers comprehensively apply the elements of the intended crime, including proving the elements of intentional wrongdoing, Actus Reus and Mens Rea, as well as excuses that eliminate a crime.
ALASAN KEPENTINGAN UMUM DALAM PEMBUBARAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS Katimin, R. Herman; Bahari, Rizki Fajar
Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Vol 12, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/justisi.v12i2.13690

Abstract

Pasal 146 ayat (1) huruf a UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas maupun peraturan pelaksana tidak menjelaskan secara spesifik alasan kepentingan umum dalam pembubaran persero terbatas sehingga dilakukan penelitian dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pembatasan kriteria kepentingan umum dan mekanisme Kejaksaan RI dalam mengajukan pembubaran perseroan terbatas demi kepentingan umum. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, diperoleh hasil bahwa Pertama. apabila selama 3 tahun atau lebih kegiatan PT berdampak terhadap stabilitas perekonomian dan pembangunan bangsa dan negara serta tidak memberikan kemanfaatan dan kesejahteraan yang luas kepada masyarakat maka terpenuhi kriteria alasan kepentingan umum. Kedua. Permohonan pembubaran PT dapat di ajukan oleh Kejaksaaan RI selaku pengacara negara, apabila melanggar kepentingan umum kepada Pengadilan Negeri untuk mendapatkan penetapan pembubaran PT, setelah melalui analisis berbagai informasi, melakukan pemeriksaan pihak perusahan berikut dokumen, instansi perpajakan, para ahli serta dampak kerugian ekonomi dan sosial terhadap masyarakat.Kata Kunci : Kepentingan Umum; Perseroan Terbatas