Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING AND TAXATION

Determinants of Sustainability Report With Company Size as Moderation Sari, Maylia Pramono; Prabowo, Gregorius Permana Wahyu Pudji; Ardina, Ayu Martaning Yogi; Raharja, Surya -
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation (JAAT)
Publisher : Pusat P2M Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaat.v10i1.8954

Abstract

Sustainability reports are important because they relate to the economic, environmental and social impacts caused by a company's activities. This study aims to prove the effect of leverage, liquidity, institutional ownership, managerial ownership on sustainability reports with company size as a moderating variable and profitability as a control variable. This study used purposive sampling, resulting in a sample of 29 Consumer Goods companies listed on the IDX for the 2018-2022 period. The study found that the sustainability reports of Consumer Goods companies are significantly and negatively affected by leverage. Liquidity and managerial ownership do not affect sustainability reporting, and sustainability reporting is positively and significantly affected by institutional ownership. In addition, the relationship between sustainability reports and leverage is supported by the size of the company. However, in consumer goods companies, the relationship between institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and liquidity in sustainability reports is not reinforced by the size of the company.
Analysis of Water Scores in Indonesian University to Accelerate the Achievement of SDGs 6 Valentino Omega Gandi, Valentino Omega Gandi; Sari, Maylia Pramono
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation (JAAT)
Publisher : Pusat P2M Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaat.v10i1.9242

Abstract

One of the 17 sustainability goals is to have access to sufficient sanitation and clean water. If human health is the main objective, clean water and adequate sanitation are crucial. The enhancement of human life and well-being is influenced by human health, particularly in emerging nations like Indonesia. Thus, the first step in achieving this objective may be education via Indonesian campuses, which is one of the most significant foundations in life. This study attempts to examine the impact of Campus Area as Control Variable (Z) and Water Score or Water Use Score as Variable X on the Total Ratio or contribution of Indonesian campuses to clean water and adequate sanitation. 50 Indonesian campuses that are UI Green Metric members served as samples for this quantitative investigation. The findings of this investigation show that the Total Ratio (Y) is positively impacted by both Campus Area (C) and Water Score (X).
The Effects of Ceo Traits, Managerial Ownership, and Profitability on ESG Performance in Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Nicholas, Jayson; Sari, Maylia Pramono
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation (JAAT)
Publisher : Pusat P2M Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaat.v11i1.12096

Abstract

This investigation is to look at how CEO Traits, Managerial Ownership, and Profitability affect ESG performance in manufacturing firms listed between 2021 until 2024 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). ESG performance is an important indicator in describing corporate sustainability, as it reflects the company's commitment not only to financial aspects but also to environmental, social, and governance responsibilities. Although attention to ESG is increasing, empirical findings on internal factors that influence ESG performance still show inconsistent results, creating a research gap, especially in the manufacturing sector, which has high risks related to environmental and social issues. Pecking order theory and agency theory are pertinent theories In this study, panel data regression is utilized quantitative methodology. There are 39 manufacturing enterprises in the sample, totaling 142 observations after data cleaning. ESG performance is measured using the Refinitiv ESG score, while CEO Traits, Managerial Ownership, and Profitability are used as independent variables using firm size as variable control. The best model used is the Random Effects Model (REM) based on the results of the Chow and Hausman tests. The findings demonstrate profitability has a significant negative effect on ESG performance. This finding demonstrates that companies with shows that businesses with high profitability typically concentrate on cost efficiency and short-term profit achievement, thereby reducing the allocation of funds for sustainability activities. Meanwhile, CEO Traits and Managerial Ownership do not have an important impact on ESG Performance, suggesting that leadership characteristics and the level of share ownership by managers are not the main determinants in improving the ESG performance of manufacturing firms Indonesia. This study expands the ESG study by simultaneously testing CEO Traits, Managerial Ownership, and Profitability while considering company size. Additional investigation is advised to broaden the context of the sector or industrial region, as well as to use other factors that may influence ESG.
The The Influence of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Performance with Company Size as a Moderating Variable Noviani, Noviani Wulan Safitri; Sari, Maylia Pramono
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation (JAAT)
Publisher : Pusat P2M Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaat.v11i1.12321

Abstract

Financial performance is a key indicator of a company’s success in managing resources and achieving business objectives. Effective corporate governance mechanisms are essential in supporting improved financial performance. This study aims to examine the effect of the board of directors, managerial ownership, and the audit committee on corporate financial performance, with firm size as a moderating variable and capital structure as a control variable. The research population consists of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2022–2024 period. Using purposive sampling, 87 companies were selected, resulting in 261 observations. Secondary data were obtained from annual reports and financial statements accessed through the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the respective company websites. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and panel data regression with a fixed effect model, processed using EViews 10 software. The results indicate that the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on financial performance. In contrast, managerial ownership and the audit committee do not have a significant effect on financial performance. Furthermore, firm size is found to weaken the influence of the board of directors and the audit committee on financial performance, while it does not moderate the relationship between managerial ownership and financial performance. This study concludes that financial performance is influenced not only by internal operational factors but also by the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms. Firm characteristics, particularly firm size, play an important role in determining the effectiveness of corporate governance in enhancing financial performance.
Determinants of Sustainability Assurance Level: Evidence from Energy Companies in Asia Saprida Khoirotunnisa; Maylia Pramono Sari
Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation (JAAT)
Publisher : Pusat P2M Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaat.v11i1.12396

Abstract

This research highlights the elements that impact corporate decision-making pertaining to the degree of sustainability assurance among enterprises operating within the Asian energy sector. In light of the escalating demands for the enhancement of transparency and accountability within sustainability disclosures has led to the identification of the assurance level as a crucial instrument for enhancing the veracity of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. Utilizing panel data derived from energy firms monitored throughout the duration of the study, this investigation employs panel data regression analysis, specifically estimated via Panel Least Squares methodology. The extent of sustainability assurance—delineated into no assurance, limited assurance, and reasonable assurance—operates as the dependent variable within the analytical framework, the independent variables are constituted by the attributes of the assurance provider, the extent of media pressure, various dimensions of board size, and the independence of the audit committee, with profitability, operationalized through return on assets (ROA), the inclusion of a control variable is warranted. The empirical results suggest that the characteristics of assurance providers, the degree of media pressure, and profitability have a positive and statistically significant effect on the assessment of the level of sustainability assurance. Corporations that engage the services of Big Four assurance firms, experience intensified media scrutiny, and demonstrate superior financial performance are more predisposed to opt for a reasonable assurance level. In contrast, the dimensions of the board and the autonomy of the audit committee do not demonstrate a statistically significant association with the selection of assurance level. These findings indicate that external pressures and financial capacity are more influential drivers of higher sustainability assurance levels than internal governance attributes. Overall, this study offers relevant insights for firms, regulators, and stakeholders seeking to strengthen sustainability assurance practices and enhance the legitimacy and credibility of ESG reporting.