Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Publika Budaya

BEREBUT ´RUMAH TUHAN´ STUDI KASUS KONFLIK ANTARA JEMAAT GKJW DAN GPIB KELURAHAN CITRODIWANGSAN KECAMATAN LUMAJANG KABUPATEN LUMAJANG, 1975-1982 Yulianti, Yanti; Sasmita, Nurhadi; Badriyanto, Bambang Samsu
Publika Budaya Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Publika Budaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (177.043 KB)

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang sejarah sosial dengan menggunakan konsep pendekatan sosiologi agama yang mempelajari peran agama dan peristiwa-peristiwa sosial dalam masyarakat Lumajang. Peristiwa-pristiwa sosial dapat memicu terjadinya konflik sehingga menimbulkan perubahan sosial di dalam masyarakat. Dengan menggunakan bahan-bahan teori sosiologi agama dan historis, artikel ini menyelidiki pandangan, pengetahuan, dan kepercayaan yang berhubungan, khususnya dengan konflik agama yang terjadi antara jemaat GKJW dengan GPIB Lumajang. Jika manusia sudah menjadi satu kesatuan dengan agama dan kelompoknya maka manusia tersebut berani membela agamanya yang dianggap benar sehingga cenderung berusaha menyelamatkan dan membela martabat agamanya. Seperti halnya yang terjadi di Lumajang kedua aliran gereja tersebut saling mempertahankan dan memperebutkan gerejanya, sehingga terjadi konflik. Mereka masing-masing mempunyai rasa ingin membela agama yang dianggapnya benar dan rela mempertahankan kekuasaan satu sama lain.
Reclaiming Nyunyur’s Plantation by Soso’s Village Society District Gandusari Blitar Regency 1964-2014 Khasanah, Binti Itaul; Sasmita, Nurhadi
Publika Budaya Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Nopember
Publisher : Publika Budaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (159.42 KB)

Abstract

    ABSTRACT This article discusses the social movement of the Soso society in the land dispute between Nyunyur Plantation with PT. Kismo Handayani by employing collective behaviour theory of Neil J. Smelser the author used the shape and strategy of social movement observed in Soso society. About 25 years, they have tried to reclaim 100 hectares of land subject to land reform, which was controlled by PT Kismo Handayani. The land was obtained by Soso society by decree of the Minister of Agriculture and Agrarian Number: 49 / Ka. / 1964. They have done a variety of procedural actions such as demonstrations, mediation, hearing and etcetera they it did not work. Finally Soso society took reclaiming as the final strategy. Previously, the land has been given a replacement, but not too small. Negotiations with various parties were always deadlocked. The government never took the initiative to resolve the dispute through it. As a result, the people do reclaiming as a way to exploit the land. The reclaimed lands were used for farming and housing. During took the plantations occupy land occupation, they did not yet feel successful and safe but still haunted by the fear of getting evicted or repressive measures of the government, because according to the law the lands were not yet legally theirs and the dispute was not yet over. Keywords: Nyunyurs Plantation, reclaiming, Soso society
SENGKETA TANAH MANDIKU: STUDI KASUS TUNTUTAN MASYARAKAT ATAS HAK MILIK TANAH DI KECAMATAN TEMPUREJO KABUPATEN JEMBER, 2007-2010 (MANDIKU LAND DISPUTES: A CASE STUDY OF DEMANDS UPON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT OF JEMBER REGENCY TEMPUREJO, 2 Munawaroh, Siti; Burhan, Edy; Sasmita, Nurhadi
Publika Budaya Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Nopember
Publisher : Publika Budaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (157.873 KB)

Abstract

Demands of the farmers in the village Mandigu Sidodadi and Rural Pondokrejo become one of the cases that arise in the reform era, starting with the installation of the boundaries a by Perhutani and the claim of Perhutani that the land occupied by the Residents Pondokrejo and Mandigu were owned by Perhutani. The farmers had the notion that the land has a meaning as an economic resource. Through Struggle Farmers, the farmers of Mandigu Sidodadi and Pondokrejo tried to fight for their land rights claimed by Perum Perhutani. It employed a qualitative approach with interviews and documentation as data collection efforts, and take the subject of social and political movements performed by Farmers Struggle. This study describes the socio-political movements performed by Struggle Farmers. With a focus on three main issues, namely land status, demands of the Struggle Farmers and Resistance Action conducted from 2007 to 2010. The conclusion is that the demand of the farmers was no longer result exploitative relations but also because of the openness of the system that provides opportunities for farming from to launch the movement. Keywords: land conflicts, political and social movements, demands of farmers, Farmers Struggle. ABSTRAK Tuntutan petani di Mandiku Desa Sidodadi dan Desa Pondokrejo menjadi salah satu kasus yang muncul di era reformasi. diawali dengan masalah pemasangan patok batas yang dilakukan Perhutani dan Pengakuan Perhutani bahwa tanah yang ditempati oleh Warga Mandiku dan Warga Pondokrejo merupakan kawasan Hutan yang dimiliki Perhutani. Petani memiliki anggapan bahwa tanah memiliki arti sebagai sumber ekonomi petani. Melalui wadah Petani Perjuangan, para petani di Mandiku Desa Sidodadi dan Desa Pondokrejo berusaha memperjuangkan hak atas tanah mereka yang telah diakui oleh Perum Perhutani. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif dengan wawancara dan dokumentasi sebagai upaya pengumpulan data, serta mengambil subyek gerakan sosial politik yang dilakukan oleh Petani Perjuangan. Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan gerakan sosial politik yang dilakukan oleh Perjuangan Petani. Dengan fokus pada tiga permasalahan utama yaitu Status tanah, Tuntutan Petani Perjuangan dan Aksi Perlawanan dilakukan dalam batasan tahun 2007 hingga 2010. Kesimpulan yang dapat diperoleh, Tuntutan Petani bukan lagi diakibatkan hubungan ekploitatif tapi juga karena adanya keterbukaan sistem yang memberikan peluang kepada petani untuk melakukan pergerakan. Kata kunci: konflik tanah, gerakan sosial politik, Tuntutan petani, Perjuangan Petani.
Reclaiming Nyunyur’s Plantation by Soso’s Village Society District Gandusari Blitar Regency 1964-2014 Binti Itaul Khasanah; Nurhadi Sasmita
Publika Budaya Vol 2 No 3 (2014): Nopember
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

    ABSTRACT This article discusses the social movement of the Soso society in the land dispute between Nyunyur Plantation with PT. Kismo Handayani by employing collective behaviour theory of Neil J. Smelser the author used the shape and strategy of social movement observed in Soso society. About 25 years, they have tried to reclaim 100 hectares of land subject to land reform, which was controlled by PT Kismo Handayani. The land was obtained by Soso society by decree of the Minister of Agriculture and Agrarian Number: 49 / Ka. / 1964. They have done a variety of procedural actions such as demonstrations, mediation, hearing and etcetera they it did not work. Finally Soso society took reclaiming as the final strategy. Previously, the land has been given a replacement, but not too small. Negotiations with various parties were always deadlocked. The government never took the initiative to resolve the dispute through it. As a result, the people do reclaiming as a way to exploit the land. The reclaimed lands were used for farming and housing. During took the plantations occupy land occupation, they did not yet feel successful and safe but still haunted by the fear of getting evicted or repressive measures of the government, because according to the law the lands were not yet legally theirs and the dispute was not yet over. Keywords: Nyunyur's Plantation, reclaiming, Soso society
BEREBUT 'RUMAH TUHAN' STUDI KASUS KONFLIK ANTARA JEMAAT GKJW DAN GPIB KELURAHAN CITRODIWANGSAN KECAMATAN LUMAJANG KABUPATEN LUMAJANG, 1975-1982 Yanti Yulianti; Nurhadi Sasmita; Bambang Samsu Badriyanto
Publika Budaya Vol 1 No 1 (2013): November
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang sejarah sosial dengan menggunakan konsep pendekatan sosiologi agama yang mempelajari peran agama dan peristiwa-peristiwa sosial dalam masyarakat Lumajang. Peristiwa-pristiwa sosial dapat memicu terjadinya konflik sehingga menimbulkan perubahan sosial di dalam masyarakat. Dengan menggunakan bahan-bahan teori sosiologi agama dan historis, artikel ini menyelidiki pandangan, pengetahuan, dan kepercayaan yang berhubungan, khususnya dengan konflik agama yang terjadi antara jemaat GKJW dengan GPIB Lumajang. Jika manusia sudah menjadi satu kesatuan dengan agama dan kelompoknya maka manusia tersebut berani membela agamanya yang dianggap benar sehingga cenderung berusaha menyelamatkan dan membela martabat agamanya. Seperti halnya yang terjadi di Lumajang kedua aliran gereja tersebut saling mempertahankan dan memperebutkan gerejanya, sehingga terjadi konflik. Mereka masing-masing mempunyai rasa ingin membela agama yang dianggapnya benar dan rela mempertahankan kekuasaan satu sama lain.
SENGKETA TANAH MANDIKU: STUDI KASUS TUNTUTAN MASYARAKAT ATAS HAK MILIK TANAH DI KECAMATAN TEMPUREJO KABUPATEN JEMBER, 2007-2010 (MANDIKU LAND DISPUTES: A CASE STUDY OF DEMANDS UPON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT OF JEMBER REGENCY TEMPUREJO, 2 Siti Munawaroh; Edy Burhan; Nurhadi Sasmita
Publika Budaya Vol 2 No 3 (2014): Nopember
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Demands of the farmers in the village Mandigu Sidodadi and Rural Pondokrejo become one of the cases that arise in the reform era, starting with the installation of the boundaries a by Perhutani and the claim of Perhutani that the land occupied by the Residents Pondokrejo and Mandigu were owned by Perhutani. The farmers had the notion that the land has a meaning as an economic resource. Through Struggle Farmers, the farmers of Mandigu Sidodadi and Pondokrejo tried to fight for their land rights claimed by Perum Perhutani. It employed a qualitative approach with interviews and documentation as data collection efforts, and take the subject of social and political movements performed by Farmers Struggle. This study describes the socio-political movements performed by Struggle Farmers. With a focus on three main issues, namely land status, demands of the Struggle Farmers and Resistance Action conducted from 2007 to 2010. The conclusion is that the demand of the farmers was no longer result exploitative relations but also because of the openness of the system that provides opportunities for farming from to launch the movement. Keywords: land conflicts, political and social movements, demands of farmers, Farmers Struggle. ABSTRAK Tuntutan petani di Mandiku Desa Sidodadi dan Desa Pondokrejo menjadi salah satu kasus yang muncul di era reformasi. diawali dengan masalah pemasangan patok batas yang dilakukan Perhutani dan Pengakuan Perhutani bahwa tanah yang ditempati oleh Warga Mandiku dan Warga Pondokrejo merupakan kawasan Hutan yang dimiliki Perhutani. Petani memiliki anggapan bahwa tanah memiliki arti sebagai sumber ekonomi petani. Melalui wadah Petani Perjuangan, para petani di Mandiku Desa Sidodadi dan Desa Pondokrejo berusaha memperjuangkan hak atas tanah mereka yang telah diakui oleh Perum Perhutani. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif dengan wawancara dan dokumentasi sebagai upaya pengumpulan data, serta mengambil subyek gerakan sosial politik yang dilakukan oleh Petani Perjuangan. Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan gerakan sosial politik yang dilakukan oleh Perjuangan Petani. Dengan fokus pada tiga permasalahan utama yaitu Status tanah, Tuntutan Petani Perjuangan dan Aksi Perlawanan dilakukan dalam batasan tahun 2007 hingga 2010. Kesimpulan yang dapat diperoleh, Tuntutan Petani bukan lagi diakibatkan hubungan ekploitatif tapi juga karena adanya keterbukaan sistem yang memberikan peluang kepada petani untuk melakukan pergerakan. Kata kunci: konflik tanah, gerakan sosial politik, Tuntutan petani, Perjuangan Petani.