Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.233
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Lentera Hukum Bimbingan dan Konseling Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Unisia VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas Lex Scientia Law Review JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Sefriani Sefriani
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 39 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Imunitas Negara Asing di Forum Pengadilan , Nasional dalam Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat: Studi kasus Putusan The European Court on Human Right dalam Al-Adsani vs The United Kingdom 21 Nopember 2001 sefriani sefriani
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art10

Abstract

It is the time that the International Human Rights regulate civil accusation to the state of serious Human Rights offender and forum or the court applied by the State automatically. It will be lose theimmunity when he make these serious human rights offende. ln order that the litigant is not the winnerin formal, so international law instrument both bilateral and regional or universal must regulate the further state property immunity.
Revitalisasi Mahkamah Internasional: Studi Kasus Sengketa Kepemilikan Sipadan-Ligitan antara Indonesia-Malaysia sefriani sefriani
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adalah terobosan baru penggunaan Mahkamah Internasional dalam sengketa Simpadan-Ligitan. Sebab baru diakui keberadaan Mahkamah Internasional sampai sekarang belum banyak dirasakan. Mungkin sebabnya secara organisasii kedudukannya tidak mempunyai yuridiksi wajib terhadap anggotanya dan tulisan injji akan melihat faktor peneyebab Indonesia memakai organisasi Mahkamah Internasional dan beberapa akibatnya.
Model Kebijakan Hukum Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan di Indonesia Sefriani Sefriani; Sri Wartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss1.art1

Abstract

This research is to study the model of legal policy of CSR in Indonesia to be effectively and beneficially implemented for the companies, community and environments. This is a normative research using the statue approach, historical approach and comparative approach. The data obtained from the research were grouped in accordance with each variable to later on be analyzed qualitatively and presented in the analytical descriptive form. The result of the research showed that the model of legal policy of CSR in Indonesia is mandatory supported by the proper sanction. Any change of paradigm of Human Right also seeing the company as the one responsible for the ecosob is a strong supporting factor for the legal policy of CSR in Indonesia.
The Implementation Of The First Pillar Of Responsibility To Protect In Indonesia: Critical Analysis Of Law On Social Conflict Management Sefriani Sefriani
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art1

Abstract

Responsibility to Protect Principle (R2P) is intended to accomplish the humanitarian intervention principle which considered has a failure in many aspects. However, the existence of this principle still leaves worry, especially for a developing country, over manipulation and politics in its implementation. The formulated problems for this research are (1) how is the development of the R2P principle in International Law? (2) how is the implementation of the first pillar of R2P to prevent mass atrocities crime in the Indonesian government? The result shows that R2P gained more supports and was adopted in General Assembly resolution, completed with three pillars and six thresholds for its implementation. The implementation of the first pillar of R2P in Indonesia as a state responsibility to protect the society from mass atrocities crime has not been conducted properly. Although Indonesia already had a law on social conflict management, however, minimum law enforcement arrangement; high impunity culture, lack of knowledge about R2P, revocation of law on CTR, the impartiality of governmenttowards some majority groups potentially make the implementation of the first pillar of R2P in Indonesia will be failed.
URGENSI KLAUSUL NON-PRECLUDED MEASURES DALAM BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATY INDONESIA Sefriani Sefriani
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (375.407 KB)

Abstract

AbstractThe legitimacy crisis of the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) within the international community was caused by the increasing regulatory disputes before the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) forum. It encourages Indonesia to discontinue several BITs, to review and to make new BIT models for Indonesia. This article aims to analyze the urgency of the non-precluding measures (NPM) clause in the new BIT Model of Indonesia to balance the interests of investors and the interests of Indonesia as the host state, considering that to date the existing BIT content is not balanced. The BIT provides so much protection to investors and, vice versa, weighty obligations to the host country. This study employed descriptive analytical method. The study concludes that the NPM Clause is very important in the new Indonesian BIT Model. At least, can be based on five arguments. First, the NPM clause will transfer risk from the country to foreign investors in situations of extraordinary threats. Second, the NPM clause will limit investor protection in certain situations. Third, the NPM clause will provide greater flexibility to Indonesia as the host to regulate its investment policy to achieve sustainable development to realize the people’s welfare, labor rights, public health, safety environment, public morals, and order. Fourth, the NPM clause is important for self-recovery during international financial crisis. Fifth, lastly, the NPM clause will balance the protection of both investors and Indonesia as the host state.Urgensi Klausul Non-Precluded Measures dalam Bilateral Investment Treaty  IndonesiaAbstrakKrisis legitimasi terhadap Bilateral Investment Treaty ( BIT)  di masyarakat internasional yang disebabkan antara lain oleh semakin meningkatnya  regulatory disputes, di forum Investor- State  Dispute Settlement  (ISDS), mendorong  Indonesia memberhentikan berlakunya beberapa BIT, meninjau ulan dan membuat model BIT yang baru untuk Indonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi klausul non precluding measures (NPM) dalam BIT Indonesia yang baru untuk menyeimbangkan kepentingan investor dengan kepentingan Indonesia selaku tuan rumah (host state) mengingat selama ini kandungan BIT tidaklah imbang. BIT memberikan perlindungan yang begitu besar pada investor dan sebaliknya kewajiban yang begitu berat kepada negara tuan rumah. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis. Hasil kajian yang dilakukan penulis menyimpulkan bahwa Klausula NPM sangat penting untuk dimasukkan dalam Model BIT Indonesia yang baru,  berdasarkan 5 argumen yaitu bahwa: klausula  NPM akan  mengalihkan resiko dari negara ke investor asing Dalam situasi adanya ancaman yang luar biasa,; klausul NPM akan membatasi perlindungan investor dalam situasi-situasi tertentu; Klausul NPM akan memberikan fleksibilitas yang lebih besar  kepada Indonesia selaku  tuan rumah untuk mengatur kebijakan investasinya dalam rangka mencapai pembangunan yang berkelanjutan (sustainable development) untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakatnya, melindungi hak-hak buruh, kesehatan masyarakat, keselamatan, lingkungan, moral publik atau ketertiban umum; Klausul NPM penting untuk pemulihan diri manakala mengalami  krisis keuangan internasional; dan bahwa Klausul NPM akan menyeimbangkan antara perlindungan terhadap investor dengan perlindungan terhadap Indonesia sebagai host state.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a2
Pengakhiran Sepihak Perjanjian Perdagangan Internasional Sefriani Sefriani
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 1 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (599.389 KB)

Abstract

Diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan pada bulan Maret 2014 mengundang kontroversi. Pasal 85 dalam undang-undang ini memberi kesempatan pada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) atau pemerintah untuk membatalkan atau mengakhiri suatu perjanjian perdagangan yang telah diratifikasi dengan alasan kepentingan nasional. Sebagaimana diketahui dalam hukum internasional berlaku prinsip pacta sunt servanda. Negara yang terikat pada suatu perjanjian internasional harus melaksanakan perjanjian internasional tersebut dengan itikad baik. Permasalahan yang diajukan dalam tulisan ini menyangkut legalitas pengakhiran perjanjian secara sepihak dengan alasan kepentingan nasional. Pengakhiran sepihak perjanjian internasional hanya dapat dibenarkan apabila sesuai dengan hal yang diatur oleh perjanjian internasional itu sendiri atau apabila perjanjian tidak mengaturnya maka harus sesuai dengan apa yang diatur dalam Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) 1969.Unilateral Termination of International Trade AgreementAbstractThe enactment of Law on Trade (Law 7/2014) on March 2014 has drawn controversies, since Article 85 of the law provides the opportunity to the house of representative (DPR) or government to withdraw or terminate a trade agreement that has been ratified by Indonesia on behalf of the national interest. It is a familiar concept that international law applies the principle of pacta sunt servanda. The countries bound to an agreement should implement the agreement in good faith. The problem proposed by this article is concerned the legality of unilateral termination of a trade agreement on the ground of national interest. Unilateral termination of an international treaty can be justified if it is in accordance with what is stipulated by international agreement itself or if the agreement is not mentioned then it must be in accordance with what is stipulated in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n1.a6
Potential Investor Claims and Possible State Defences During the Covid-19 Emergency Sefriani Sefriani; Seguito Monteiro
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1067.pp236-246

Abstract

Since it was announced as a public health emergency of international concern in 2019, Covid-19 has caused enormous loss of property and life. The country's emergency policies in responding to the Covid outbreak are numerous, such as closing public transportation and prohibiting the export of medical devices. These policies have potentially harmed the interests of investors. This study has three purposes: investors' potential claims to challenge state measures addressed to Covid-19, the legal defences of states, and the possibility of an international investment dispute. This study shows that investors' potential claims may be delivered based on violations of the principles of fair and equal treatment, full protection and security, and national treatment and the most favoured nations. While a state can defend itself based on the principles of force majeure and state necessity, states can also defence through Non preclude measures or right to regulate clause in international investment agreements. In addition, it would also be better to build international solidarity and cooperation to mitigate and defeat the Covid-19 pandemic than sue the government before ISDS. States need collective action to avoid a surge of investor-state Arbitration. Governments’ policy to combat Covid-19 is to be considered as acting in necessity and therefore cannot be found in breach of their investment treaty obligations as long as that policy meet the necessity, proportionate, and non-discrimination requirements.
PERLINDUNGAN HAM BURUH MIGRAN TAK BERDOKUMEN BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN DAN HUKUM HAM INTERNASIONAL Sefriani Sefriani
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.2.207

Abstract

Undocumented migran worker violate immigration rule and potentially give damage toward host state. However many persons exploited them, get advantages from illegal status of the worker. Two problems in this research are how does international law protect undocumented migrant worker and what solutions offer to host state to solve undocumented migran worker matter. This thesis employs normative method of research with qualitative analysis. The result of this thesis reveals international law protect undocumented worker without discrimination. Preventive action will be better conducted by host state than enforcementKeywords: undocumented migran worker, illegal, non discrimination
KARAKTERISTIK THE MOST SERIOUS CRIME MENURUT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Sefriani sefriani
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 6, No 2 (2013): HAK DALAM KEMELUT HUKUM
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v6i2.107

Abstract

ABSTRAKThe most serious crime adalah satu-satunya kejahatan yang bisa digunakan oleh negara yang masih ingin mempertahankan hukuman mati. Karakteristik the most serious crime dalam hukum internasional di antaranya: tindak pidana yang dilakukan merupakan perbuatan yang keji dan kejam, menggoncangkan hati nurani kemanusiaan; Adanya unsur kesengajaan, terorganisir, sistematis,dan meluas untuk menimbulkan kematian atau akibat-akibat yang sangat serius lainnya; Akibat yang ditimbulkan dari tindak pidana itu sangat serius terhadap negara atau masyarakat luas. Putusan MK Nomor 15/PUU-X/2012 yang memasukkan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan yang menimbulkan luka berat atau matinya orang sebagai the most serious crime tidak sesuai dengan hukum internasional. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan tidak ada hukum internasional maupun hukum nasional yang memasukkan tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan sebagai the most serious crime. Kata kunci: the most serious crime, pencurian dengan kekerasan, hukuman mati.ABSTRACT‘The most serious crime’ is the term for a category of crime that is used by the country that still retains the death penalty. The definition of the most serious crime according to the International Laws is a heinous and cruel crime, which shook the conscience of humanity. It is intentional, organized, systematic, and widespread causing death or other serious impacts on the state or the public at large. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-X/2012 which categorized a violent theft which has caused serious injury or death as ‘the most serious crime’, is not in line with International Laws. This paper analyzes and resolves that there is nothing in the International Laws or National Laws classifying any violent theft into the category of ‘the most serious crime’.Keywords: the most serious crime, violent theft, the death penalty.
URGENSI REKONSEPTUALISASI DAN LEGISLASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF DI INDONESIA Sefriani Sefriani
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 2, No 2 (2013): August 2013
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i2.77

Abstract

Keadilan restoratif merupakan konsep yang populer di seluruh dunia, termasuk Indonesia. Selama ini konsep keadilan restoratif dikenal sebagai penyelesaian di luar pengadilan, dan hanya diterapkan terhadap peradilan anak ( juvenile ) dan tindak pidana ringan. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana perkembangan dan pengaturan keadilan restoratif dalam hukum HAM internasional dan bagaimana urgensi rekonseptualisasi dan legislasi keadilan restoratif dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, history , perbandingan, dan filosofis. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah bahwa hukum HAM internasional telah memberikan prinsip standar minimum bahwa penerapan keadilan restoratif tidak hanya untuk kasus juvenile , tetapi juga untuk pelanggaran HAM berat, serta tindak pidana biasa yang tidak terbatas tindak pidana ringan. Perkembangan lain adalah dikenalnya hybrid keadilan restoratif. Sangat urgen bagi Indonesia untuk merekonseptualisasi dan melegislasikan keadilan restoratif secara komprehensif dalam sistem perundang-undangan Indonesia karena keadilan restoratif banyak memberikan manfaat; legislasi akan menghapuskan atau mengurangi hambatan sistematis penerapan keadilan restoratif; memberikan legal inducement , menyediakan panduan pelaksanaan, struktur dan pengawasan program restoratif, serta menjamin perlindungan hak pelaku dan korban yang berpartisipasi dalam restorative programs . Saran penelitian ini adalah segera dilakukan rekonseptualisasi dan penglegislasian keadilan restoratif supaya tidak hanya menjadi wacana tetapi dapat diterapkan dalam kasus konkret.Restorative justice has been popular in the world including Indonesia. Generally, restorative justice known as criminal justice outside the court; applied for juvenile and misdemeanor. Issues raised were how development and arrangement of restorative justice in international human right and how the urgency legislation reconceptualization and restorative justice legislation in the judicial system of Indonesia. Research methods are juridical normative with statute, historical, comparison and philosophy approach. The conclusion is that International human right law has given minimum standard principles, that the application of restorative justice is not only for juvenile cases, but also for gross human rights violations, as well as ordinary criminal offenses are not limited misdemeanor. Another development is the known of hybrid restorative justice. Urgently for reconceptualizing and legislating of comprehensive restorative justice in the Indonesian law system as restorative justice provides many benefits; l egislation would eliminate or reduce barriers to systematic implementation of restorative justice; provide legal inducement, providing practical guidance and oversight structures restorative programs, and ensure the protection of rights of perpetrators and victims participating in restorative program. Suggestion of this research is to be done reconceptualization and legislating that restorative justice is not just a discourse, but can be applied in concrete cases.
Co-Authors Bugivia Maharani Setiadji Putri Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto Febriani, Yasyfa Fitria Kasih Ghaisani, Amalina Julian, Aris Rahmat Khoirunnisa, Hafara Mohammad Ikhsan, Mohammad Monteiro, Seguito Putra, Jaya Indra Santosa Putra, Jaya Indra Santoso Putro, Yaries Mahardika Ramadhan, Muhammad Rizki Safitri, Alya Ananda Seguito Monteiro Setiadji Putri, Bugivia Maharani Sri Wartini Tamas, Fezer Vania Lutfi Safira Erlangga Yusnetti Yusnetti