Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Kajian Pariwisata dan Bisnis Perhotelan

Persepsi Wisatawan Tentang Fasilitas Objek Wisata Aek Sijorni Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan Elia Nandayana Pane; Ira Meirina Chair; Dwi Pratiwi Wulandari
JURNAL KAJIAN PARIWISATA DAN BISNIS PERHOTELAN Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Kajian Pariwisata dan Bisnis Perhotelan
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jkpbp.v2i2.11572

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian dilakukan yaitu untuk mengetahui Persepsi Wisatawan Tentang Fasilitas Objek Wisata Aek Sijorni Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif dengan metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey. peneliti melakukan perlakuan dalam pengumpulan data, misalnya dengan mengedar koesioner, test, wawancara, terstruktur dan sebagainya. Populasi penelitian yaitu wisatawan yang pernah berwisata ke Aek Sijorni. Metode penelitian ini adalah dengan teknik non probability sampling berjumlah 99 responden. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui angket dengan menggunakan skala likert berjumlah 26 pernyataan yang sudah teruji validitas, dan realibilitas. analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif. digunakan untuk mendapatkan gambaran distribusi frekuensi data yang mencakup nilai maksimal dan minimal, mean, median, standar deviasi dan tingkat pencapaian responden menggunakan program SPSS versi 23.00 dan Ms. Excel. Hasil penelitian: Secara keseluruhan Persepsi Wisatawan Tentang Fasilitas Objek Wisata Aek Sijorni Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan dengan nilai rata-rata skor aktual yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini yaitu sebesar 8011 yang berada pada rentang interval 6436–8366 di kategorikan cukup dengan interpretasi persentase penilaian sebesar 51%. Selanjutnya berdasarkan indikator berikut ini: 1)Indikator Bentuk persentase penilaian responden 0% kategori sangat baik, 12% kategori baik, 48% kategori cukup, dan 39% kategori kurang. 2)Indikator Fungsi menunjukkan persentase penilaian responden 0% kategori sangat baik, 8% kategori baik, 51% kategori cukup, dan 40% kategori kurang. 3)Indikator Lokasi persentase penilaian responden 1% kategori sangat baik,12% kategori baik, 49% kategori cukup, dan 37% kategori kurang. 4)Indikator Mutu persentase penilaian responden 0% kategori sangat baik, 13% kategori baik, 59% kategori cukup, dan 40% kategori kurang. Kata Kunci: Persepsi Wisatawan Tentang Fasilitas Objek Wisata Aek Sijorni Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan
Persepsi Wisatawan Tentang Fasilitas Wisata Pulau Panjang Air bangis Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Mega Wulan Dari; Ira Meirina Chair; Dwi Pratiwi Wulandari
JURNAL KAJIAN PARIWISATA DAN BISNIS PERHOTELAN Vol 3 No 3 (2022): Jurnal Kajian Pariwisata dan Bisnis Perhotelan
Publisher : Departemen Pariwisata Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jkpbp.v3i3.29472

Abstract

This paper begins with the results of observations on Panjang Island Air Bangis West Pasaman. There is no trash can, which causes visitors to litter, the location of the toilet is far from the location of the tourist attraction, the condition of the potholed road, the size of the musholla is too small and there is no place of ablution in the musholla, the lack of lodging facilities around Panjang Island, eating and drinking facilities are inadequate.The type of research is quantitative descriptive research with survey methods. The population in this study were tourists who came to visit tourism on Panjang Island Air Bangis West Pasaman. in the last 5 years was 330.9, the type of non probability sampling used was purposive sampling with a total of 77 people. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive analysis to determine the perception of tourists about tourist facilities on Long Island. The results showed that the interpretation of the percentage of tourists' assessments was dominantly classified as good at 50.65%, in the road access sub-indicator located in the sufficient category with a percentage assessment of 54.55%, then the pavilion or photo arena sub-indicator was located in the good category with a percentage assessment of 83.12%, in supporting facilities for the accommodation sub-indicator located in the good category with a percentage assessment of 89%, 61% then the sub-indicator of places to eat and drink is located in the good category with a percentage assessment of 61.04%, and the sub-indicator of shopping facilities is located in the sufficient category with a percentage assessment of 76.62%, for complementary facilities the sub-indicator of public toilets is located in the sufficient category with a percentage assessment of 51.95%, Based on the results of the research, the researcher suggests that the manager and the tourism office pay more attention to the facilities contained in the tourist attraction.
Pengaruh Kualitas pelayanan dan Perceived Value Terhadap Kepuasan Tamu (studi Pada Tamu MICE di Hotel Truntum) Riko Andofal; Rian Surenda; Dwi Pratiwi Wulandari
JURNAL KAJIAN PARIWISATA DAN BISNIS PERHOTELAN Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Kajian Pariwisata dan Bisnis Perhotelan
Publisher : Departemen Pariwisata Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jkpbp.v4i1.41572

Abstract

The research was based on observations during industrial field experience and pre-research at Truntum Padang hotel, where several obstacles were found related to Service Quality and Perceived Value to Guest Satisfaction of MICE Service Users. The research method is quantitative with a causal relationship. Using nonprobality sampling technique by taking 100 respondents. This study uses a questionnaire to collect data using a Likert scale of 42 statements that have been tested for validity and reliability, the data is described through the analysis requirements test and hypothesis testing using multiple linear regression analysis techniques and the coefficient of determination using SPSS 20.00. Research results: (1) Service quality is in the very good group with a result of 56%. (2) Perceived value is in the good group with a result of 56%. (3) Satisfaction is in the good group with 63% results. Hypothesis testing shows the effect of X1 on Y with Sig. 0.00 <0.5 while t count 5.866> t table 1.9847, so H1 is accepted, the effect of X2 on Y is 0.238> 0.05 and t count 1.186 < t table 1.9847, so H2 is rejected, while the effect of Xl and X2 together on Y is 0.00 <0.05 and F count 63.269> from F table 3.09 so it can be said that H3 is accepted and R Square is 0.556.