Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Global Health Management Journal

Medical Students’ Perception on the Ideal Lecturer Attributes in Problem-Based Learning on the Onion Model Theory Erlangga, M. Ramses; Meidianawaty, Vivi; Permatasari, Tissa Octavira
GHMJ (Global Health Management Journal) Vol. 8 No. 1s (2025): Special Issues
Publisher : Yayasan Aliansi Cendekiawan Indonesia Thailand (Indonesian Scholars' Alliance)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35898/ghmj-81s1118

Abstract

Background: The success of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is closely related to an effective discussion process. A good PBL will affect the success of the learning process. In addition, an effective teaching process from lecturers to students is very influential in producing a qualified doctor. Korthagen's Onion Model is a theory that emphasizes layered aspects in communication and can provide an in-depth view of the relationship between lecturers and students in the context of learning, such as PBL. Aims: To identify what is the ideal lecturer attributes in Problem Based Learning based on the onion model theory according to medical faculty students. Methods: This study uses a descriptive method. Respondents were selected using stratified random sampling techniques, resulting in 98 respondents. This study uses primary data with univariate analysis. Results: From the 98 analyzed samples, it was found that level 1 students gave the highest average score on the identity aspect, with the following average scores: Level 1 (14.4167), Level 2 (13.1111), Level 3 (12, 6667), and Level 4 (12.7826). The behavioral aspect also showed similar results, with the highest score at Level 1 (14.0417) followed by Level 2 (13.5926), Level 3 (13.2083), and Level 4 (13.1739). Conclusion: Most students of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, have a good perception of the attributes of ideal lecturers in Problem-Based Learning based on the Onion Model Theory.
Self-reflection Levels in Learning among the Medical Students at Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia Faturrahman, Farhan Raka; Permatasari, Tissa Octavira; Meidianawaty, Vivi
GHMJ (Global Health Management Journal) Vol. 7 No. 3s (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Aliansi Cendekiawan Indonesia Thailand (Indonesian Scholars' Alliance)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35898/ghmj-741068

Abstract

Background: Self-reflection is one of the most important characteristics that students, especially medical students, need to have during their studies. With the challenges across medical doctor programs, students need to have adequate self-assessment skills. Aims: This study aims to determine the level of self-reflection skills in students of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati at the academic and professional stages. Methods: This is a descriptive observation research with 418 respondents consisting of students at the academic and professional stages. This study used a reflection-in-learning questionnaire that has been adapted into Indonesian to assess the level of student self-reflection with the results are divided into six levels of indicators: "Null", "Minimal", "Restricted", "Partial", "Sufficient", and "Maximal". Results: The results of this study indicate that the highest level of student self-reflection is in the "Sufficient" indicator (45%), followed by the "Maximal" indicator (34.2%), the "Partial" indicator (18.7%), the "Restricted" indicator (1.9%), the "Minimal" indicator (0.2%), and the "Null" indicator (0%). Conclusion: This study concludes that the level of self-reflection skills in students of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, both at the academic and professional stage, is classified as a level of ability that is quite good.   Received: 25 September 2024  |  Reviewed: 17 October 2024  |  Revised: 05 November 2024  |  Accepted: 30 November 2024.
Attributes Descriptions among the Medical Lecturers in Implementing the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Based on the Onion Model Theory Maharani, Alya; Meidianawaty, Vivi; Permatasari, Tissa Octavira
GHMJ (Global Health Management Journal) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Aliansi Cendekiawan Indonesia Thailand (Indonesian Scholars' Alliance)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35898/ghmj-921326

Abstract

Background: Lecturer attributes influence how Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is facilitated. However, the descriptive profile of lecturer attributes based on the Onion Model has not been previously documented at Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia. Understanding these attributes is important to inform faculty development, reflective practice, and curriculum quality improvement. Aims: To describe the attributes of medical lecturers in implementing the PBL based on the Onion Model framework. Methods: This descriptive observational study involved 58 medical lecturers who serve as PBL tutors with varying teaching experience. Participants were selected using purposive sampling and completed the Student-Centred Perspectives on Teaching (SCPT) questionnaire. Responses were measured using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Mean scores above 3 indicate high alignment with student-centred teaching attributes. Data were analysed using univariate descriptive statistics. Results: All Onion Model aspects demonstrated mean scores above 3, indicating generally positive lecturer attributes toward student-centred PBL. The highest mean score was observed in the Belief aspect (3.70), followed by Behaviour and Mission (3.67), Competence (3.56), Environment (3.54), and Identity (3.53). Conclusion: This study provides a descriptive profile of lecturer attributes in PBL implementation. The findings indicate that lecturers generally report student-centred teaching attributes across Onion Model domains. These findings describe lecturer characteristics and do not indicate effectiveness or causal impact on learning outcomes.