Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2021 - 2026

2.319

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Pandecta Varia Justicia Borobudur Law Review Borobudur Law and Society Journal Borobudur Journal on Legal Services

Habib Muhsin Syafingi

Jl. Tidar 21 Magelang, Jawa Tengah Indonesia 56125

Author-ID : 398520

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

EFEKTIFITAS PENGAWASAN HAKIM OLEH KOMISI YUDISIAL Moch Ikhsan, Oddie; Syafingi, Habib Muhsin; Sintha Dewi, Dyah Adriantini
Varia Justicia Vol 13 No 1 (2017): Vol 13 No. 1 Maret 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (156.924 KB)

Starting from the establishment of a suspect Candidate Former National Police Chief Pol Commissioner General Budi Gunawan then apply prapradilan to the South Jakarta District Court. Because the 77 Criminal Code stated determination of the suspect is not an object pretrial. In those articles which can be handled by pretrial regulated limitative, only for legitimate or not the arrest, detention, discontinuation or termination of the investigation and prosecution of compensation or rehabilitation for a criminal case was stopped at the level of investigation or prosecution. After a single judge South Jakarta District Court partially granted the petition Sarpin Rizaldi prapreadilan BG. In his judgment, Sarpin interprets the determination of the suspect as one of the pre-trial. Judge Sarpin Ats such action under the spotlight of the Judicial Commission for the above decision. The Judicial Commission then recommended to the Supreme Court Judge Sarpin to sanctions, but the Supreme Court rejected the recommendation because they have entered the realm of the judges decision. The formulation of the problem in this study is How Model Judicial Oversight Committee, Oversight Problems To Know judge by the Judicial Commission, the Judicial Commission How the Implementation Monitoring and Oversight How effective implementation of the functions of the Judicial Commission in supervising judges and its influence on the judicial power. The method used in this research is using normative juridical approach, the specification of the research is descriptive analytical.Based on the findings of the Judicial Commission has the concept of preventive surveillance by the repressive, namely to prevent and then are giving emphasis and contain sanctions. The Judicial Commission has the authority to give the sanction of ethics recommendations to the Supreme Court but the repressive ie without the MA recommendations, the recommendations of the Judicial Commission to be worth sia. Cooperation and there is no obvious surgical realm between the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission.

Starting from the establishment of a suspect Candidate Former National Police Chief Pol Commissioner General Budi Gunawan then apply prapradilan to the South Jakarta District Court. Because the 77 Criminal Code stated determination of the suspect is not an object pretrial. In those articles which can be handled by pretrial regulated limitative, only for legitimate or not the arrest, detention, discontinuation or termination of the investigation and prosecution of compensation or rehabilitation for a criminal case was stopped at the level of investigation or prosecution. After a single judge South Jakarta District Court partially granted the petition Sarpin Rizaldi prapreadilan BG. In his judgment, Sarpin interprets the determination of the suspect as one of the pre-trial. Judge Sarpin Ats such action under the spotlight of the Judicial Commission for the above decision. The Judicial Commission then recommended to the Supreme Court Judge Sarpin to sanctions, but the Supreme Court rejected the recommendation because they have entered the realm of the judge's decision. The formulation of the problem in this study is How Model Judicial Oversight Committee, Oversight Problems To Know judge by the Judicial Commission, the Judicial Commission How the Implementation Monitoring and Oversight How effective implementation of the functions of the Judicial Commission in supervising judges and its influence on the judicial power. The method used in this research is using normative juridical approach, the specification of the research is descriptive analytical.Based on the findings of the Judicial Commission has the concept of preventive surveillance by the repressive, namely to prevent and then are giving emphasis and contain sanctions. The Judicial Commission has the authority to give the sanction of ethics recommendations to the Supreme Court but the repressive ie without the MA recommendations, the recommendations of the Judicial Commission to be worth sia. Cooperation and there is no obvious surgical realm between the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission.

LAW ENFORCEMENT OF STREET VENDORS BY THE CIVIL SERVICE POLICE UNIT Fariza Tama, Fasa; Sintha Dewi, Dyah Adriantini; Syafingi, Habib Muhsin
Varia Justicia Vol 15 No 1 (2019): Vol 15 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

This study aims to analyze the implementation and identify the obstacles to control of street vendors (PKL) by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) in Temanggung Regency. This research was conducted with a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews with Satpol PP Officers. Secondary data was obtained from legal materials consisting of Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 54 of 2011 concerning Operational Standards for Civil Service Police Procedure and Regional Regulation of Temanggung District Number 12 of 2011 concerning Cleanliness, Beauty, Order, and Environmental Health. The data analysis technique used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results showed that controlling the street vendors conducted by Satpol PP was carried out through several stages, namely 1) coaching and socialization; 2) issuing warning letters, and; 3) demolition of merchant stalls. This control effort has not been able to reduce the number of street vendors who break the rules. Constraints faced in the efforts to control street vendors, among others: 1) the rules which are used as the basis for control are still general in nature; 2) there is no specific location for the existence of street vendors; 3) sanctions are regulated only in the form of criminal sanctions; 4) human resources/personnel of Satpol PP are still lacking; 5) lack of coordination across Regional Apparatuses, and; 6) public awareness (PKL) is still low. Thus, Temanggung District Regulation Number 12 of 2011 concerning Cleanliness, Beauty, Order, and Environmental Health has not been effective in generating PKL compliance with regulations.

Co-Authors Agatha, Amanda Delvia Alan Bayu Aji Ardianto, Anugrah Dwi Setyo Bambang Tjatur Iswanto, Bambang Tjatur Basri Basri Budiharto Budiharto Choully, Aufilana Dwi Dakum, Dakum Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi Efendi, Rahmadhani Widi Fariza Tama, Fasa Fianto, Ardi Kusna Fitri, Emilia Nur Hakim, Hary Abdul Heniyatun Herawati, Diandra Yuanita Hidayah, Ngirfah Insani, Yeirmila Nurlita Izzati, Alfina Nur Johny Krisnan, Johny Listari, Kartika Dwi Meivialora, Meivialora Moch Ikhsan, Oddie Moch Ikhsan, Oddie Muhammad, Fadil Mukti, Krisna Noviasari, Dilli Trisna Praja, Chrina Bagus Editha Prasetiyo, Adi Candra Prayoga, Aryudha Ilham Ramadhan Puji Sulistyaningsih Qotrunada, Amelia Ramadhani, Sarah Budi Rejeki, Tri Suharso Suharso Tarihoran, Muthiarahmi Yogi Satria Nugraha, Yogi Satria Yudha, Angga Pradipta Yulia Kurniaty Yulianto, Yoga Farhan

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : Varia Justicia

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Varia Justicia