Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.083
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Sumbula : Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Sosial dan Budaya
Moh. Irfan
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pembinaan Kasus Bullying Oleh Guru Bimbingan Konseling Terhadap Siswa SMPN 2 Mojoagung Jombang Moh. Irfan; Shofwatal Qolbiyyah; Uswatun Hasanah
Sumbula: Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Darul 'Ulum Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32492/sumbula.v11i1.11125

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research ains to explore how Guidance and Counseling teachers address bullying cases involving both perpetrators and victims at SMPN 2 Mojoagung Jombang.The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. Data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that bullying at SMPN 2 Mojoagung Jombang manifests in both physical and psychological forms, typically occurring when students with perceived weaker. The causes of bullying are influenced by internal and external factors. Internal factors include personality traits and family attitudes that hinder the development of mature character, while external factors relate to environmental and cultural conditions. To address these issues, Guidance and Counseling teachers provide continuous support through individual counseling, information sessions, and character-building activies, both inside and outside the classroom, thereby reducing bullying incidents. Additionally, the 5S program ( smile, greet, handshake, polite address, and courtesy ) is promoted, Regular evaluations are conducted to assess the effectiveness of these interventions, particularly in relation to bullying prevention. Keywords: Bullying, Guidance and Counseling, Students
Deconstructing the State’s Penal Authority: A Contemporary Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah Appraisal of the Controversial Clauses in the New Indonesian Criminal Code Ahmad Agus Ramdlany; Ahmad Musadad; Baihaqi Baihaqi; Saiful Abdullah; Misno Misno; Moh. Irfan
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2027): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 (New Criminal Code) represents a pivotal moment in decolonizing Dutch colonial criminal law in Indonesia. Yet, this reform raises fundamental philosophical questions regarding the boundaries of state penal authority. This dilemma reflects a broader transnational paradigm shift across Muslim-majority nations facing the challenge of reconciling penal restraint, constitutional democracy, and Islamic legal philosophy. The criminalization of ideology, public order, religion, and morality heightens concerns over overcriminalization. This reveals a deeper tension between positive law, constitutional rights, international human rights treaties (ICCPR and UDHR), and the Islamic principle of legality (tasyrī’ī). Purpose: This study evaluates the legal legitimacy of the New Criminal Code’s controversial provisions through contemporary maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, demonstrates the organic harmonization between Pancasila and Islamic law, and formulates a normative model for state penal boundaries. Methods: Utilizing normative legal research, this study integrates statutory, conceptual, comparative, and maqāṣid approaches. Primary legal materials, Constitutional Court rulings, and maqāṣid literature were analyzed qualitatively, complemented by purposive expert interviews (Prof. Moh. Mahfud MD and Prof. Topo Santoso) serving as communis opinio doctorum (tertiary sources). Data were evaluated through content analysis, normative interpretation, and legal reasoning. Results: Findings show that while controversial provisions pursue legitimate state aims, several clauses compromise legal certainty and sanction proportionality. The analysis unveils a tension between maṣlaḥah ʿammah and maṣlaḥah fardiyyah in public order clauses, establishes operational judicial parameters to distinguish criticism (ḥifẓ al-ʿaql) from insult (ḥifẓ al-karāmah), and highlights an epistemological shift in ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ from classical punitive enforcement toward contemporary privacy and personal autonomy protection. Implication:  This research provides legislative guidelines, offers an urgent analytical framework for the Constitutional Court during judicial review, and prevents penal state overreach. Transnationally, it serves as a theoretical contribution to criminal law reform in Muslim-majority jurisdictions Originality: This study establishes the Contemporary Maqāṣid-Based Penal Legitimacy Framework (CMPF) as its core intellectual brand, comprising five principles: justice, necessity (ultimum remedium), proportionality, public welfare (maṣlaḥah), and human dignity. Unlike prior studies, it conceptualizes maqāṣid as a limiting theory on state power organically harmonized with Pancasila and global human rights standards
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Riyadi Abdul Natsir Abdul Rouf Ahmad Agus Ramdlany Ahmad Musadad Amirullah Fikri Baihaqi Baihaqi Eny Fatimatuszuhro Pahlawati Jumadi Jumadi Khoirul Huda Misno Misno Mochamad Syaifuddin Moh. Wahib Muhiddin Muhiddin Mukhammad Nur Hadi Saiful Abdullah Shofwatal Qolbiyyah Toyyibatul Hasanah Uswatun Hasanah Zainul Abidin