Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.542
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Hukum The Southeast Asia Law Journal Syntax Idea Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
Hedwig Adianto Mau
Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Jayabaya
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge

 1   2 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERJANJIAN KERJA BERSAMA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN Sarikin, Sarikin; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Nur Hakim
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 2: Juli 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the field of labor, disputes between employers and workers usually arise because of feelings of dissatisfaction. Employers provide policies that they consider good and will be accepted by workers, but because the workers concerned have different considerations and views. However, in its implementation, there are various challenges in aligning the interests of employers and workers, especially in the context of the Collective Labor Agreement and the Law. From this background, the formulation of the problem arises, namely 1) How does Law Number 6 of 2023 affect the validity and implementation of the Collective Labor Agreement (PKB)? 2) What are the prospects and challenges of implementing the Collective Labor Agreement (PKB) in industrial relations in the future after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023? This study uses the theory of agreement and the theory of legal certainty. This research is descriptive with a normative legal approach emphasizing the use of secondary data in positive legal principles, namely laws and regulations and library materials with qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this study show that the implementation of the PKB in the future is greatly influenced by how all parties, both workers, employers, and the government are able to understand and adapt to the dynamics of the new labor law. Law No. 6 of 2023, although it has pros and cons, must still be used as a legal reference in compiling a balanced and fair PKB. Therefore, the success of the implementation of the PKB in the future requires collective efforts from all parties: workers, employers, and the government. There needs to be a shared awareness that the PKB is a product of social dialogue that must be built on a foundation of trust, legal knowledge, and a willingness to work together.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT UJI FORMIL Ratib, Victor Albadi’u; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Maryano, Maryano
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 4: September 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since its establishment, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia has been instrumental in upholding the supremacy of the 1945 Constitution through its constitutional review mechanism. While initially focusing on the substantive aspects of legislation, the Court has progressively extended its scrutiny to include the formal constitutionality of the lawmaking process. This study adopts a normative juridical approach, employing statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical methods. Legal materials were gathered from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources and analyzed through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The research finds that the Constitutional Court has evolved from a moderate stanceprioritizing legal continuity—to a more assertive role in guarding procedural legitimacy, particularly through the introduction of the concept of conditional unconstitutionality. Recent jurisprudence, however, demonstrates a pragmatic approach wherein laws are annulled only if procedural violations are deemed substantial and infringe upon democratic principles such as representation and public participation. Decisions No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, and No. 132/PUU-XXII/2024 reflect the Court’s increasing commitment to ensuring that legislative procedures align with constitutional standards. These developments reinforce the principle that procedural compliance is not merely formalistic, but essential to the legitimacy of democratic lawmaking and the realization of legal certainty in Indonesia.
EKSISTENSI MUATAN KEKUASAAN PEMERINTAHAN NEGARA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Prijanto, Prijanto; Yuhelson, Yuhelson; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 8: Januari 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i8.9418

Abstract

Sejak awal UUD 1945 diamandemen tahun 1999-2002, telah mendapat tentangan dari kalangan negarawan, politisi, akademisi, punawirawan TNI/Polri yang tergabung dalam Front Pembela Proklamasi ’45 (FPP ’45), bahkan kini aktivis pencinta konstitusi pun ikut menentang, sehingga pada peringatan 25 tahun reformasi, Ketua MPR RI Bamsoet menyampaikan adanya diskursus tentang konstitusi di masyarakat, yaitu: (1) mempertahankan hasil amandemen, atau UUD 2002 (2) kaji ulang UUD 2002, (3) melakukan amandemen ke-5, dan (4) kembali ke UUD 1945 untuk disempurnakan dengan adendum. Dengan adanya diskurus tersebut, maka untuk mendapatkan pilihan terbaik, salah satunya perlu dilakukan penelitian terhadap ‘’Eksistensi Muatan Kekuasaan Pemerintahan Negara Dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945’’, khusus Pasal 6 ayat (1) dan (2) UUD 1945, dan Pasal 6 ayat (1), Pasal 6A ayat (1) dan (2) UUD 2002, serta Pasal 16, dalam UUD 1945 dan UUD 2002, dengan rumusan masalah apakah pasal-pasal tersebut sesuai dengan pemikiran Founding fathers and mothers Indonesia dan Pembukaan UUD 1945, serta bagaimana seharusnya sikap bangsa Indonesia terhadap diskursus tersebut. Jenis penelitian dipilih yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute Approach), sejarah (Historical Approach), analisis (Analytical Approach) dan perbandingan (Comparative Approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 6 ayat (1) dan (2), serta Pasal 16 UUD 1945 sesuai dengan pemikiran Founding fathers and mothers Indonesia dan Pembukaan UUD 1945; sedangkan Pasal 6 ayat (1), Pasal 6A ayat (1) dan (2) serta Pasal 16 UUD 2002 tidak sesuai dengan pemikiran Founding fathers and mothers Indonesia dan Pembukaan UUD 1945, karena pembentukannya ada intervensi asing, sehingga muatan bersifat liberalis, individualistis dan kapitalistis; yang outcome dari Pemilu yang diciptakan tidak saja mahal dalam ukuran rupiah, tetapi mahal karena rusaknya nilai-nilai kehidupan bangsa Indonesia, seperti pembelahan persatuan bangsa, KKN, lahirnya buzzer dan influencer politik yang brutal, melahirkan oligarki, menjamurnya ketidakjujuran dan ketidakadilan, turunnya kualitas kepemimpinan dan peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga lemahnya check and balance yang mengakibatkan hutang Indonesia tak terkontrol, yang kesemuanya merupakan indikator adanya kegentingan negara, dan oleh karena itu bangsa Indonesia diharapkan segera kembali ke UUD 1945 untuk disempurnakan dengan adendum, sebelum Indonesia punah.
Co-Authors Agung Bayu Adji Agus Wicaksono Susanto Ahsanta Maulana Aldi Rizky Setiyawan Ani Afrilda Sinaga Asty Lestari Pratama Putri Brianta Petra Ginting Candra, Mardi Deviani Nur Amalina Edwin Efrizal HS Eka Sakti Panca Indraningsih Ekky Saputra Fernando Hasibuan Fitri Mastuti Nurul Fuadah Herdia Noor Hafnita Mardi Candra Maria Anna Samiyati Mario Setiawan Maryano, Maryano Nur Hakim Oktinardo Mandira Dulage Kansil Petrus Yakobus Bapa Prijanto, Prijanto Putra Hutomo Ramlani Lina Sinaulan Ratib, Victor Albadi’u Romadhani Setio Prabowo Rotua Valentina Sagala Sarikin, Sarikin Sirajuddin Sirajuddin Syaepudin, Mohamad Tofik Yanuar Chandra Tofik Yanuar Chandra Umar Suryadi Bakry Yohanes Pradipta Eka Yudha Adi Nugraha Yuhelson Yuhelson