Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.357
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Arena Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Undang: Jurnal Hukum Kosmik Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Fachrizal Afandi
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Basic Considerations of Judges in Imposing Criminal Code Article 81 Paragraph 2 of the Child Protection Law Against Children Who Have Sexual Intercourse on the Basis of Consent Muhammad Fathony Rizky Noorizain; Fachrizal Afandi; Prija Djatmika
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 3 (2023): IJHESS DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.716

Abstract

In this study, the author raises the issue of the basis of the judge's consideration in imposing punishment on children who commit Copulation on the basis of mutual consent. This is motivated because it is not clearly regulated in the Child Protection Law regarding the crime of sexual intercourse committed by a child if the sexual intercourse is carried out on the basis of mutual consent without any element of violence or persuasion from the perpetrator to the victim, causing a vacuum of norms. The formulation of this problem is How is the evidentiary arrangement of the case of sexual intercourse committed by a child on the basis of mutual consent in Indonesia and What is the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a criminal decision based on Article 81 paragraph (2) of the Child Protection Law against children who have sexual intercourse on the basis of mutual consent. The objectives in this study are (1) To know and analyze the criminal proof of sexual intercourse committed by children on the basis of mutual consent in Indonesian criminal law enforcement. (2) To know and analyze the basis of the judge's consideration in handing down a verdict against minors who have consensual sexual intercourse. To analyze this problem, the theories that will be used as guidelines for analysis are the theory of evidence, the theory of justice, expediency and legal certainty. This type of research uses normative legal methods consisting of a statutory approach (statue approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach) and case study approach (case law). The results of this study, the author concludes that the Child Protection Law does not recognize the term consensual because the position in child sexual intercourse against children who are consensual, children are seen in the position of victims. Although in the proof the act is done consensually or child fornication. The criminal regulation is regulated in Article 81 of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection
ISLAM AND STATE’S LEGAL PLURALISM: The Intersection of Qanun Jinayat and Criminal Justice System in Indonesia Afandi, Fachrizal; Bagaskoro, Ladito Risang
Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman Vol 19 No 01 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/epis.2024.19.01.1-26

Abstract

The article seeks to investigate the intersection of local-based religion legal system and state’s legal system. It focuses on the constitutional debates on the position and the status of Aceh Qanun Jinayat within the Indonesian legal system and how the Indonesian Supreme Court the Islamic penal law based on Aceh’s Qanun in their decisions. Using the legal research approach, this article begins with the background of the Qanun Jinayat implementation in Aceh, then discusses the constitutional debates on the position of the Qanun in the Indonesian legal system and ends with analyses of Supreme Court decisions on the application of the Qanun Jinayat in criminal cases in Aceh. This article argue that Aceh’s Qanun is similar to the other provincial regulation within the Indonesian legal system, which has limited areas to regulate the punishment in criminal cases. However, the paper found that although the Indonesian legal system forbids Aceh’s Qanun holds the penalty more severe than the National criminal law, the Supreme Court seems to accept these practices and use them in their decisions in Aceh’s criminal cases.
Do Prosecutors Have The Authority To Realize The Restorative Justice? An Indonesian Case Sasongko, Andy; Abdul Madjid; Yuliati; Fachrizal Afandi
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/aclj.v6i1.38457

Abstract

This article explores the role of a prosecutor in realizing restorative justice in Indonesia. This research employs a socio-legal method, focusing on how legal certainty, legal order, justice, and truth can be achieved by upholding human values,  religious norms, politeness, and decency. The Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia has established, among others, the prosecutorial function and authority to promote restorative justice in terminating prosecutions in Indonesia based on Prosecutor's Regulation of Indonesia (PERJA RI) Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecutions Based on Restorative Justice. With the amendment of PERJA RI, it is hoped that the public prosecutor in handling criminal cases will act more humanely and conscientiously, prioritizing restorative justice, which aims at restoration to protect the lives of victims and people who commit criminal acts on the grounds of humanity and justice in society instead of focusing on retaliation against perpetrators. As the state institution responsible for prosecutions, the prosecutor's office strives to uphold legal certainty, truth, and justice in line with legal principles while respecting humanity, morality, decency, and religious values.
Regulating Prosecutorial Independence and Impartiality in The Indonesian Criminal Justice System Afandi, Fachrizal
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i2.25981

Abstract

This article examines prosecutorial independence in Indonesia by analyzing three key aspects: the status of prosecutors as civil servants, the constitutional position of the Prosecution Service, and the role of prosecutors in the criminal justice system. It applies an interdisciplinary legal research method by reviewing laws, regulations, and relevant theories. Understanding these aspects helps assess whether the current legal framework adequately protects prosecutors from external influence and recognizes them as independent legal actors, similar to magistrates in other jurisdictions. Prosecutorial independence and impartiality ensure fairness in the criminal justice system. In Indonesia, prosecutors work as civil servants, similar to those in many inquisitorial systems. However, the law does not clearly define their role as magistrates with judicial authority. This legal uncertainty makes them vulnerable to political and hierarchical pressure, which can influence their decisions. A strong legal framework must protect prosecutors from external interference and allow them to act independently, as magistrates do in other systems. The findings highlight a critical issue: the law classifies prosecutors as civil servants but does not formally recognize them as independent legal actors. This gap allows political leaders, superiors, and other parties to interfere in prosecutorial decisions. Without strong legal protection, prosecutors struggle to maintain impartiality. This article argues that lawmakers must formally recognize prosecutors as independent legal actors, similar to magistrates. Legal reforms should strengthen prosecutorial independence and prevent undue influence. A clear legal framework will protect prosecutors, enhance public trust, and uphold justice in Indonesia.
THE VAGUENESS OF THE NORM OF ENTRAPMENT IN DRUG OFFENSES BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN THE FUTURE Annisa Azzahra Burhan; I Nyoman Nurjaya; Fachrizal Afandi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2988

Abstract

Undercover buying and controlled delivery are investigative techniques regulated by Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This provision does not regulate the limitations for investigators when carrying out this technique. In practice, this technique does not work effectively, resulting in the failure of the investigation. So this study discusses how the application of Undercover buying and controlled delivery current supervision and how the formulation of criminal law policies in dealing with cases of entrapment of narcotics crimes committed by law enforcement officers in the future. This study uses normative research. The research results show that First, there is a need for renewal of covert buying techniques and supervised delivery. This is because there are 3 (three) legal problems in its implementation, namely there are still informants who are involved in narcotics trafficking, closed access to public information regarding covert purchasing techniques and delivery under supervision by the National Narcotics Agency and the potential for fabrication of cases. Therefore, in the future it is necessary to have the right formulation to overcome this by implementing regulations and legal standards for investigating narcotics crimes.
The Decriminalization of The Offense of Cultivating Type I Narcotics in Law Number 1 Of 2023 on The Indonesian Criminal Code Nababan, Anisa Magdalena; Aprilianda, Nurini; Afandi, Fachrizal
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (On Progress July-Desembe
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1148

Abstract

This thesis addresses the decriminalization of the cultivation of Group I narcotics following the revocation of Article 111 of the Narcotics Law by Article 622 paragraph (1) letter w of the National Criminal Code (KUHP Nasional) 2023. This situation, effective in 2026, creates a legal vacuum. This normative juridical research, employing statutory, historical, and conceptual approaches, aims to identify the ratio legis of previous regulations and propose an appropriate formulation. The findings show the ratio legis for regulating narcotic cultivation in the previous Narcotics Law was to break illicit supply chains and deter offenders, in line with international conventions. To fill the vacuum, the thesis recommends explicitly re-regulating the cultivation of Group I narcotics in Article 609 paragraphs (1)a and (2)a of the KUHP Nasional, with severe penalties, to criminalize and combat narcotics trafficking from its source.
Reconstruction of Intersection the Customary Court and State Criminal Court for Indigenous Communities in Papua Suhariyanto, Budi; Mulyadi, Lilik; Afandi, Fachrizal; Muhammad S.R.P., Sri Gilang
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Reforming Legal Frameworks: Justice, Rights, and Innovation in Indonesia and Be
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v9i2.19155

Abstract

The Law on Special Autonomy for Papua Province grants the Customary Court the authority to adjudicate criminal cases involving indigenous Papuans. Parties dissatisfied with the decisions of the Customary Court may appeal to the State Court. However, conflicts arise when the formal criminal justice system intervenes before the customary resolution process is completed, creating jurisdictional clashes. This raises the question of how to harmonize the relationship between these two judicial systems in a manner that fosters accommodation rather than resistance. This study employs both document analysis and field research, including interviews with law enforcement officials, judges, academics, and traditional leaders in Jayapura and Manokwari. The findings reveal that the intersection between the Customary Court and the State Court is inevitable, as the subject matter, object, and principles of criminal responsibility overlap between the two systems. To mitigate conflicts, a reconstruction of the interaction between Customary Courts and State Courts is essential, particularly in the adjudication of criminal cases involving customary law communities. Key strategies include fostering synergy and aligning perceptions between the apparatus of the Customary and State Courts. Additionally, the development of comprehensive guidelines for handling customary crime cases is crucial. Such guidelines would provide judges operating within Papua’s jurisdiction with a clear framework for considering customary law, thereby promoting integration and mutual respect between the two judicial systems. This approach aims to ensure that both customary and state legal traditions coexist harmoniously within the context of Papua’s special autonomy.
The Role Of The Legal System And Law Enforcement In Handling Crimes Of Corruption: A Comparative Analysis Of Indonesia, Malaysia, And Thailand Gaol, Michael Yudhistira Lumban; Majid, Abdul; Afandi, Fachrizal
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.5012

Abstract

The  criminal  act  of  corruption  that  is  rampant  in  the  country  is  not  only  detrimental  to  state  finances  but  is  a  violaton  of  the  social  and  economic  rights  of  society  at  large,  corruption  is  no  longer  a  national  problem,  but  has  become  a  transnational  phenomenon  so  that  internatonal  cooperaton  is  essential  in  preventing  and  eradicating  it.  , in  fact,  for  what  has  been  caused  by  the  crimnal  act  of  corrupton,  extraordinary  efforts  are  needed  in  terms  of  prevention  and  eradication  of  crimnal  acts  of  corruption.  One  of  the  efforts  to  prevent  Indonesia  from  falling  due  to  corruption  is  to  confiscate  and  return  assets  resulting  from  corrupton  crimes  based  on  the  laws  and  regulations  in  force in  the  Indonesan  legal  system.  in  Indonesia,  there  is  no  uinfied  institution  that  has  the  right  to  deal  with  corruption.  The  eradication  of  corruption  in  Indonesia  is  carred  out  by  3  state  institutions,  namely  the  Attorney  General's  Office,  the  Police,  and  the  Corrupton  Eradication  Commission  (KPK).  The  eradication  of  corruption in  one  country  will  not  run  optimally  if  it  is  not  supported  by  the  government's  political  will  to  eradicate  corruption,  the  unity  of  state  institutions  that  eradicate  corrupton,  and  the  enforcement  of  existing  corrupton  eradication  regulations.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Abdul Majid Abdul Majid Annisa Azzahra Burhan Bagaskoro, Ladito Risang Budi Suhariyanto, Budi Daru Adianto Gaol, Michael Yudhistira Lumban I Nyoman Nurjaya I NYOMAN NURJAYA Lilik Mulyadi Lucky Endrawati Martri Sonny Michael Yudhistira Lumban Gaol Milda Istiqomah Monnachu Wemonicha Lovina Muhammad Fathony Rizky Noorizain Muhammad S.R.P., Sri Gilang Nababan, Anisa Magdalena Nurini Aprilianda Prija Djatmika Prischa Listiningrum Sasongko, Andy YULIATI