Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

Pulling at Both Ends of the String: The Political and Legal Tug in Refugee and Migration Policy in Indonesia Fakhrirafi Zharfan; Ristina Yudhanti; Dewi Sulistianingsih; Achmad Fahmi Zulfikar; Ngboawaji Daniel Nte; Adnan Ibrahim Sarhan; Ridwan Arifin
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v11i2.15543

Abstract

This paper analyzes the complex and often contradictory dynamics of refugee and migration policy in Indonesia, framed within the political and legal tug-of-war that shapes human rights protections. As one of Southeast Asia’s key transit and destination countries for refugees and migrants, Indonesia's policy approaches are influenced by both international obligations and domestic political considerations. Despite being a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention, Indonesia has not adopted comprehensive national legislation to protect refugees, leaving a gap in the legal framework that often results in ad-hoc, inconsistent practices. This study critically examines the tension between political interests—such as national sovereignty, security concerns, and public opinion—and the legal obligations tied to human rights protections under international law. The research analyzes the roles of domestic political actors, including the government, lawmakers, and civil society, in shaping policies related to refugees and migrants. It also explores the legal frameworks that both constrain and enable state actions regarding asylum seekers, detention, and deportation. Through a review of recent case studies and policy shifts, this paper highlights the challenges of balancing humanitarian obligations with domestic priorities. The analysis underscores the need for a more coherent and rights-based approach to migration and refugee policy in Indonesia, suggesting that the existing legal and political landscape often pulls in opposite directions, undermining effective protection for vulnerable populations. Ultimately, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on global migration governance, offering insights into how national policies can evolve to better protect refugees while navigating political realities.
Strategi Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Tengah dalam Menangani pelanggaran Netralitas ASN Pada Pilkada Serentak Mheyscha Zhalsadilla Nelman; Ristina Yudhanti
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (April–Mei 2025)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i1.882

Abstract

Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) merupakan aspek krusial dalam menjaga integritas pemilu yang demokratis. Namun, dalam implementasinya, masih sering terjadi pelanggaran yang berpotensi memengaruhi hasil pemilu secara tidak adil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji strategi yang diterapkan oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) Provinsi Jawa Tengah dalam menanggulangi pelanggaran netralitas ASN pada Pilkada Serentak. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif normatif, penelitian ini menelaah berbagai mekanisme pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Bawaslu, seperti pemantauan langsung, penerimaan serta verifikasi laporan, dan pemberian rekomendasi sanksi kepada pihak yang melanggar. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan yang ketat, peningkatan pemahaman ASN melalui edukasi, serta penerapan sanksi yang tegas menjadi faktor utama dalam menekan pelanggaran netralitas. Kendati demikian, masih terdapat kendala dalam proses pengawasan, seperti rendahnya pemahaman ASN terhadap aturan netralitas, kurangnya sanksi yang efektif, serta kemungkinan adanya intervensi politik. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kolaborasi antara Bawaslu, Komisi ASN, serta masyarakat untuk memperkuat efektivitas pengawasan dan menjamin pelaksanaan pemilu yang transparan serta berkeadilan.
SINKRONISASI YURIDIS DUALISME SISTEM PERADILAN MILITER BERBASIS DUE PROCESS APPROACH UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN SOCIAL JUSTICE Barbara Cloudya; Ristina Yudhanti
IPMHI Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Special Issue: UNNES Students' Contribution to Advancing the Development of Ind
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipmhi.v5i3.42458

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis upaya sinkronisasi yuridis dualisme sistem peradilan militer berbasis Due Process Approach dan merumuskan serta menganalisis sinkronisasi yuridis dualisme sistem peradilan militer berbasis Due Process Approach dalam mewujudkan social justice. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual Approach). Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa sinkronisasi dualisme sistem peradilan militer dengan melakukan reformasi atau revisi terhadap perundangan yang mengatur peradilan militer, mempersiapkan peradilan umum untuk dapat memproses hukum anggota militer yang melakukan tindak pidana umum atau membentuk undang-undang baru, pelaksanaan proses peradilan yang lebih terbuka, transparan dan akuntabel serta pembahasan yurisdiksi yang jelas antara peradilan militer dan umum dapat mengakomodasi pencapaian sinkronisasi peradilan militer. Untuk meletakkan Due Process of Law sebagai basis peradilan militer maka secara substantif mempersyaratkan aturan hukum peradilan militer seperti KUHPM dan UU Disiplin militer harus adil, tidak sewenang-wenang, dipatuhi dan secara prosedural harus dilakukan dengan baik sesuai tahapan, memenuhi hak peradilan yang independen, memenuhi hak membela diri terdakwa, memberlakukan prinsip praduga tak bersalah, menyediakan mekanisme banding dan kasasi secara transparan dan terbuka. Untuk mewujudkan social justice maka harus memenuhi keadilan bagi korban dengan pemulihan hak secara nyata, keadilan bagi pelaku dengan perlindungan hak terdakwa, memberikan akses informasi dan akuntabilitas dalam peradilan militer, akan mendukung pencapaian social justice. 
The Illusion of Women’s Substantive Representation: Normative Vacuum in Committee Assignments of the Central Java Provincial DPRD Ristina Yudhanti; Krisna Eka; Ani Purwanti; Edvardas Juchnevicius; Rengga Kusuma Putra
Vifada Assumption Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Yayasan Vifada Cendikia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70184/y219ez20

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how the normative vacuum in the Rules of Procedure of the Central Java Provincial DPRD undermines women’s substantive representation within committee assignments and formulates institutional reforms to address the resulting pattern of gendered portfolios and glass walls. Research Design and Methodology: This normative legal research employs a statutory approach, a conceptual approach grounded in Feminist Jurisprudence and institutional sociology, and a case approach to analyze the internal legal structure governing the Parliamentary Completeness Apparatus (AKD). Findings and Discussion: The findings show that the absence of binding rules on proportional distribution leaves committee assignments to factional discretion, producing gendered portfolios through the concentration of women in welfare-related committees and reinforcing glass walls that limit their access to strategic budgetary and infrastructural bodies. This condition demonstrates that women’s electoral presence in the DPRD has not yet been translated into substantive representation within the AKD. Implications: The study therefore recommends institutional engineering through binding amendments to the Rules of Procedure, including cross-commission distribution, mandatory women’s representation in the Budget Committee, and proportional leadership arrangements within the AKD in line with Constitutional Court Decision Number 169/PUU-XXII/2024.
Normative Reconstruction of Blacklists in Government Procurement as an Instrument for Building Legal Awareness and Preventing the Practice of ‘Flag Borrowing’ Anggara Rawijayadi; Martitah Martitah; Ristina Yudhanti
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.130

Abstract

Background: Government procurement of goods and services is a strategic instrument in state financial management that must be implemented based on the rule of law, fair competition, and integrity. However, flag-borrowing practices (manifested in bid rigging, the use of falsified documents, and contract management by parties outside the official corporate structure) reveal distortions in the legal identity of business entities within the procurement system. Objective: This article examines the alignment between the conception and practice of blacklists and the principle of the rule of law, and formulates a normative reconstruction based on responsive regulation to sustainably prevent flag-borrowing practices. Methods: This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, enriched by a socio-legal perspective through a case study of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Results: The analysis shows that the absence of a limitation period, the lack of an explicit obligation for proportionality review, and issues of enforcement temporality create disharmony between the objective of regulatory guidance and the principle of legal certainty. Conclusion: The reconstruction of blacklists should be directed toward five pillars: affirmation of a system-integrity orientation, temporal limitation of sanctions, proportionality review, beneficial ownership transparency, and a compliance-based rehabilitation mechanism. Through this approach, blacklists can be repositioned as a responsive, constitutional, and effective legal guidance instrument for preventing flag-borrowing practices in Indonesian public procurement.
Application of the Dilution Doctrine in Trademark Registration as Legal Protection for Trademarks in Indonesia Pandam Bayu Seto Aji; Martitah Martitah; Ristina Yudhanti
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.49132

Abstract

This research examines and analyzes the concept and regulation of the trademark dilution doctrine, which has long developed in the United States, as a form of legal comparison, as well as the implementation of the dilution doctrine in the substantive examination of trademark registration in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical research employing statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case study approaches. This study uses secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are then qualitatively analyzed. Data collection techniques involve literature study by tracing widely published written information. The results of this study show that trademark violations in Indonesia are dominated by imitation marks, thereby requiring legal reform in trademark law through the adoption of the dilution doctrine similar to that of the United States. Article 21 paragraph (1)(c) of the Indonesian Trademark and Geographical Indication Law mandates the application of the dilution doctrine, although it does not explicitly regulate it. This indicates that Indonesia has the potential to implement the dilution doctrine. However, the significant differences between the United States and Indonesia make full implementation of the doctrine difficult. One of the main challenges in implementing the dilution doctrine is the communal character of Indonesian society. When analyzed using Jeremy Bentham’s Utilitarianism Theory, the result shows that implementing the dilution doctrine would produce greater pain for Indonesia. Therefore, adjustments and legal formulations are needed to accommodate the interests of all parties, including clear and detailed regulations that govern dispute resolution and evidentiary standards in court. The implementation of the dilution doctrine in substantive examination also needs to be tightened to reduce future trademark disputes.
Peran Bawaslu dalam Penanganan Pemungutan Suara Ulang pada Pemilu 2024 di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Refala Roqi Yatazakka; Ristina Yudhanti
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v5i2.3216

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran dan strategi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) Provinsi Jawa Tengah dalam pengawasan PSU pada Pemilu 2024, serta mengidentifikasi faktor penyebab PSU dan kendala yang dihadapi di lapangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan, analisis dokumen hukum dan wawancara. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa PSU di 30 TPS di 14 kabupaten/kota di Jawa Tengah sebagian besar disebabkan oleh pelanggaran administratif dan kelemahan dalam tata kelola teknis. Bawaslu telah menerapkan strategi berjenjang seperti rapat koordinasi, pelatihan teknis, simulasi pengawasan, serta evaluasi kelembagaan untuk memperkuat pengawasan PSU. Namun demikian, tantangan seperti kurangnya pemahaman teknis pengawas dan lemahnya sistem pencegahan masih menjadi hambatan. Nilai kebaruan dari penelitian ini terletak pada pemetaan konkret terhadap bentuk pelanggaran dan strategi pengawasan PSU berbasis evaluasi empiris. Rekomendasi strategis yang diajukan mencakup penguatan kapasitas SDM pengawas, pemanfaatan teknologi pengawasan, dan reformulasi regulasi teknis yang lebih adaptif terhadap dinamika pemilu.
Women's Legislative Representation and the Pursuit of Gender-Mainstreaming in Public Policy Formulation Ristina Yudhanti; Moh. Imam Gusthomi; Rizqan Naelufar; Dina Ristanti; Gabriel Aditya Permana S; Deva Sakti Susmana; Halim Rahmansah
Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v9i1.36023

Abstract

The representation of women in parliament is expected to yield policies that support women's interests. This study examines legal issues related to women's representation in the legislative process, with the aim of formulating policies that prioritize gender mainstreaming for women. The findings indicate that female representation has successfully produced gender-responsive legal instruments that offer protection against the rising incidence of violence against women. The enactment of Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS) constitutes a crucial milestone. Sustained collaboration with relevant stakeholders is essential to ensure the effective implementation of this legislation, including through the formulation of implementing regulations and the enhancement of public awareness. The legislative process undertaken by female legislators in crafting protective policies is inseparable from prevailing cultural challenges. This research constitutes Basic Research employing a socio-legal methodology through qualitative inquiry, utilizing both primary and secondary data sources. The research cluster contributes to assessing the extent to which women's representation in the legislative process advances the formulation of policies that foreground gender mainstreaming. The objective of this study is to measure the degree to which women's representation in the legislative process contributes to the development of policies that prioritize gender mainstreaming for women. This involves an analysis of the messages and narratives conveyed by parliament during the legislative process, and the identification of key factors influencing the effectiveness of women's representation in promoting gender mainstreaming.