Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Sistem Zonasi, Afirmasi, dan Prestasi terhadap Motivasi Belajar Kelas X SMA Negeri 8 Purworejo Khaerani Anggitasari; Cahyo Apri Setiaji; Anita Rinawati
Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): September - Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/jsgp.8.3.2025.6919

Abstract

Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada upaya memahami secara mendalam bagaimana kebijakan penerimaan peserta didik baru melalui sistem zonasi, afirmasi, dan prestasi yang dirancang untuk menciptakan pemerataan akses pendidikan ternyata tidak selalu berkorelasi dengan aspek psikologis siswa, khususnya motivasi belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh sistem zonasi, afirmasi, dan prestasi terhadap motivasi belajar ekonomi kelas X SMA Negeri 8 Purworejo. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods dengan desain sequintal explanatory, di mana analisis kuantitatif dilakukan pada tahap awal untuk mengidentifkasi hubungan dan pengaruh antar variabel, diikuti oleh eksplorasi kualitatif untuk memperkuat interpretasi hasil. Sampel terdiri atas 144 peserta didik yang dipilih secara acak sederhana (simple random sampling) dari total populasi sebanyak 216 peserta didik. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penyebaran kuesioner secara langsung kepada responden, dengan instrumen penelitian yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya untuk memastikan kelayakan pengukuran variabel dan wawancara terstruktur. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan uji regresi sederhana dan korelasi parsial. Hasil analisis regresi sederhana diperoleh t-hitung 0,237, sedangkan t-tabel adalah 1,664 (0,237 < 1,664) dan p-value 0,814 (0,814 > 0,05). Sedangkan untuk analisis korelasi parsial nilai korelasi sebesar 0,026 dan p-value 0,814 (0,814 > 0,05). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa sistem zonasi tidak berpengaruh secara positif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi belajar ekonomi. Hasil analisis regresi sederhana diperoleh t-hitung -0, 235, sedangkan t-tabel adalah 1,697 (-0,235 < 1,697) dan p-value 0,816 (0,816 > 0,05). Sedangkan untuk analisis korelasi parsial nilai korelasi sebesar -0,043 dan p-value 0,816 (0,816 > 0,05). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa afirmasi tidak berpengaruh secara positif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi belajar ekonomi. Hasil analisis regresi sederhana diperoleh t-hitung -0,439, sedangkan t-tabel adalah 1,708 (-0,439 < 1,708) dan p-value 0,665 (0,665 > 0,05). Sedangkan untuk analisis korelasi parsial nilai korelasi sebesar -0,087 dan p-value 0,665 (0,665 > 0,05). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa prestasi tidak berpengaruh secara positif dan signifikan terhadap motivasi belajar ekonomi. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa jalur penerimaan tidak menjadi faktor penentu utama dalam membentuk motivasi belajar.
PENGARUH INPUT DAN PROSES TERHADAP PRODUK PROJEK PENGUATAN PROFIL PELAJAR PANCASILA DI SMK MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOREJO Shakira Khalyana Pallaz Athena; Sugeng Eko Putro Widoyoko; Cahyo Apri Setiaji
Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JURKAMI) Vol 10, No 3 (2025): JURKAMI
Publisher : STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31932/jpe.v10i3.5370

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of input and process on the P5 product at SMK Muhammadiyah Purworejo. The urgency of this research lies in the importance of evaluating the implementation of the P5 project as part of the Merdeka Curriculum, which focuses on developing students’ character and competencies. The research method employed is an evaluative study with a quantitative approach, utilizing the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. The sample consisted of 58 students selected from a population of 71 eleventh-grade students using the proportional random sampling technique. This method ensures that the sample selection is representative, with the number of subjects proportionally determined for each class. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document analysis, then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicate that the input and process variables simultaneously influence the P5 product, with R = 0.797, Fcount = 47.839, and a significance value of 0.000. Future studies are recommended to include the context aspect to make the evaluation of P5 implementation more comprehensive and sustainable.
PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERDIFERENSIASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA SMAN 6 PURWOREJO DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR Lia Lestari; Cahyana Nursidiq; Cahyo Apri Setiaji
Promosi: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi Vol 14 No 2 (2026): Promosi
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/jp.v14i2.14113

Abstract

Students’ learning outcomes in Economics subjects still show variation influenced by learning models and levels of learning motivation. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes of tenth-grade students at SMA Negeri 6 Purworejo between those who participated in differentiated learning based on Project-Based Learning and those who followed conventional learning, the differences in learning outcomes based on high, moderate, and low levels of motivation, as well as the interaction between learning models and motivation in influencing learning outcomes. The population consisted of all tenth-grade students of SMA Negeri 6 Purworejo in the 2024/2025 academic year, totaling 249 students, with the sample determined using cluster random sampling. The research instruments included a learning motivation questionnaire with a Likert scale and an Economics achievement test that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests. The results showed significant differences in learning outcomes between students who experienced differentiated learning based on Project-Based Learning and those who experienced conventional learning. In addition, there were differences in learning outcomes based on motivation levels, where highly motivated students achieved better results than students with moderate or low motivation. However, no interaction effect was found between learning models and motivation on learning outcomes. It can be concluded that differentiated learning based on Project-Based Learning is effective in improving students’ learning outcomes, particularly for those with high learning motivation.