Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

The implementation and effectiveness of Indonesian Supreme Court Rule No. 3 of 2017 on women victims of the sexual violence in Yogyakarta Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi; Kamaludin, Aang; Khakim, Mufti; Sugiharto, Gatot
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILD AND GENDER STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/equality.v9i2.18069

Abstract

PERMA (Supreme Court Rule) No. 3 of 2017 issued by the Supreme Court regulates the attitude guidelines for judges in adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law, both criminal and civil cases involving women as victims, witnesses, or parties. These regulations can be used as a legal basis by judges in adjudicating cases of women in conflict with the law due to criminal acts of sexual violence. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating cases of women in conflict with the law as a result of victims of sexual violence at the Yogyakarta District Court. The method used in this research is empirical normative, which focuses on collecting information obtained from judges at the Yogyakarta District Court regarding the effectiveness of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 against women as a result of victims of sexual violence. The approach methods that the author uses in this research include the conceptual approach, the statutory approach, and the case approach. The data collection method is through interviews and documentation of judges, and the data analysis used is descriptive-qualitative. This research concludes that PERMA No. 3 of 2017 has been quite effective in accordance with the theory of legal effectiveness, which uses several a quo decisions as samples to determine whether PERMA No. 3 of 2017 has been applied and implemented in the Yogyakarta District Court for women victims of sexual violence.
Robot Prosecutors and the Future of Criminal Justice in Indonesia: Innovation, Ethics, and Legal Implications Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi; Fernando, Zico Junius; Rinaldi, Kasmanto
PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 12, No 1 (2025): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Robot prosecutors represent the integration of robotic technology and artificial intelligence (AI) into the traditional role of a prosecutor, reflecting the global trend towards automation and the application of technology within the legal system. This concept is no longer merely a theoretical; it has begun to materialize in certain jurisdictions. For instance, China has emerged as a pioneer in this field by successfully developing an innovative AI program capable of not only of identifying crimes through detailed data analysis but also of filing appropriate lawsuits. This progress underscores the immense potential of this technology to enhance efficiency and accuracy in judicial processes, while simultaneously raising significant questions about ethics, transparency, and justice. This study employed normative methods and utilizing several approaches, including comparative, conceptual, and futuristic approaches. Qualitative analysis was applied to the collected materials; and content analysis was used to classify legal materials. The findings emphasize that while robot prosecutors can improve efficiency in handling routine and data-driven cases, their role should not replace human judgment in more complex and ethically sensitive cases. The legal system must ensure a balance between technological advancements and fundamental principles of justice. Collaboration between AI and human prosecutors, guided by clear protocols, is essential to maintain fairness and ethical integrity, particularly in cases involving moral and social considerations. Thus, Indonesia’s approach to integrating robot prosecutors should focus on establishing transparent oversight mechanisms and protecting the rights of defendants, particularly the right to appeal, to ensure that technological advancements support rather than compromise justice. The adoption of robot prosecutors in Indonesia has the potential to revolutionize the legal landscape. However, it must be pursued cautiously, taking into account both the technological benefits and the human values that underpin justice.
Paradigma Unsur Delik Aduan terhadap Perzinaan dalam Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Sutran, Moh. Raihan Rizaldi; Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi
Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 23 (2025): Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Kebaharuan KUHP Nasional dan Urgensi Pembaharuan KUH
Publisher : UM Purwokerto Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/pssh.v23i.1561

Abstract

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana merupakan dasar hukum yang telah dipakai oleh bangsa Indonesia sejak lama. Aparatur negara dan para ahli hukum sedang berusaha untuk memperbarui KUHP karena KUHP merupakan produk hukum Belanda yang sampai saat ini harus diperbarui. Para ahli hukum berpendapat bahwa Indonesia harus mempunyai produk hukumnya sendiri karena KUHP buatan Belanda dianggap belum sesuai dengan norma dan kebiasaan masyarakat Indonesia. Pembaruan hukum pidana yang dilakukan oleh aparatur negara saat ini telah disahkan, tetapi masih banyak masyarakat yang merasa resah dengan beberapa Pasal di dalam KUHP Nasional. Salah satunya adalah tentang tindak pidana perzinaan. Pasal 411 KUHP Nasional tentang tindak pidana perzinaan telah diubah ketentuan pidananya. Pasal 411 KUHP Nasional mendapat perluasan makna dan delik aduan di dalamnya masih dianggap kurang layak dan mendapatkan perdebatan panjang oleh para ahli hukum dan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui konsep dari delik aduan dalam tindak pidana perzinaan di KUHP Nasional serta mengetahui kebijakan hukum tentang delik aduan dalam tindak pidana perzinaan di KUHP/Wetboek van Strafrecht dan KUHP Nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis dan diperkuat dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan komparatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dianalisis oleh penulis, terdapat perbedaan paradigma dan makna delik aduan yang diperluas dalam tindak pidana perzinaan di dalam Wetboek van Strafrecht maupun KUHP Nasional.
The Implementation of Scientific Crime Investigation Mechanisms in Police Regional Office Proof Criminal Cases Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi; Rizqullah, Alfan Noufal; Nur, Muhammad
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 9, No 1 (2024): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2024)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.48377

Abstract

Investigation is a critical stage in criminal proceedings aimed at uncovering evidence to illuminate the nature of an offense and identify its perpetrator or suspect. The application of Scientific Crime Investigation (SCI) methods in these investigations leverages a scientific approach drawn from diverse disciplines to enhance the collection and analysis of evidence. This study seeks to underscore the importance of integrating SCI into the substantiation of criminal cases and explore its operational implementation within police regional offices. This empirical juridical research draws upon library materials and field studies to examine the urgency and efficacy of SCI in criminal investigations. Data analysis employs a descriptive-qualitative method to elucidate how the SCI method functions as a systematic tool in gathering evidence crucial for courtroom presentation. The evidentiary robustness of SCI findings, including expert testimonies and forensic reports, lends them substantial weight as incontrovertible evidence obtained through rigorous scientific processes. Aligned with legal theories such as bewisjmidellen, bewijsmnimum, negatief wettelijk bewijstheorie, bewisjkracht, and bewijsvoering, the SCI method encompasses several key components: 1) Identification, involving the examination of fingerprints to establish identities; 2) Digital forensics, for analyzing electronic and digital evidence; 3) Forensic psychology, aiding in the assessment of psychological states of victims, witnesses, and perpetrators; and 4) Forensic medicine, facilitating examinations related to injuries, poisoning, or fatalities conducted by forensic physicians. Each phase of the SCI method adheres rigorously to legal frameworks and procedural guidelines. By integrating these specialized disciplines, SCI enhances the investigative process, ensuring thoroughness and credibility in the pursuit of justice within the bounds of the law.
The Implementation of Scientific Crime Investigation Mechanisms in Police Regional Office Proof Criminal Cases Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny; Alfan Noufal Rizqullah; Muhammad Nur
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2024)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.36419

Abstract

Investigation is a critical stage in criminal proceedings aimed at uncovering evidence to illuminate the nature of an offense and identify its perpetrator or suspect. The application of Scientific Crime Investigation (SCI) methods in these investigations leverages a scientific approach drawn from diverse disciplines to enhance the collection and analysis of evidence. This study seeks to underscore the importance of integrating SCI into the substantiation of criminal cases and explore its operational implementation within police regional offices. This empirical juridical research draws upon library materials and field studies to examine the urgency and efficacy of SCI in criminal investigations. Data analysis employs a descriptive-qualitative method to elucidate how the SCI method functions as a systematic tool in gathering evidence crucial for courtroom presentation. The evidentiary robustness of SCI findings, including expert testimonies and forensic reports, lends them substantial weight as incontrovertible evidence obtained through rigorous scientific processes. Aligned with legal theories such as bewisjmidellen, bewijsmnimum, negatief wettelijk bewijstheorie, bewisjkracht, and bewijsvoering, the SCI method encompasses several key components: 1) Identification, involving the examination of fingerprints to establish identities; 2) Digital forensics, for analyzing electronic and digital evidence; 3) Forensic psychology, aiding in the assessment of psychological states of victims, witnesses, and perpetrators; and 4) Forensic medicine, facilitating examinations related to injuries, poisoning, or fatalities conducted by forensic physicians. Each phase of the SCI method adheres rigorously to legal frameworks and procedural guidelines. By integrating these specialized disciplines, SCI enhances the investigative process, ensuring thoroughness and credibility in the pursuit of justice within the bounds of the law.
Analysis Of Legal Discovery Methods By Judges In Rechterlijk Pardon's Perspective to Solve Criminal Cases Gatot Sugiharto; Mira Julita Sari; Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny; Fauzan Muhammadi
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.4397

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This research aims to ascertain the legal discovery process that judges use to assess whether to grant rechtlijk pardon in order to resolve criminal cases, as well as the challenges judges encounter while attempting to do so. Methodology: Normative legal research was used in this paper. Normative legal research, which is carried out in the literature review in the form of pertinent legal regulations and norms, is a scientific research technique grounded in the logic of jurisprudence (doctrine) to seek truth from a normative perspective. Results: The study's findings lead to the following conclusions: firstly, judges can perform rechvorming through the use of the construction legal discovery method, which takes the form of legal narrowing or legal refining, while determining rechterlijk pardon. Secondly, in carrying out the revision, the court employed the process of finding construction law based on restorative justice. Applications of this study: The study gives a more comprehensive understanding analysis, given that the current criminal law formulation policy does not embrace the value of genuine forgiveness by judges. However, judges retain very particular authority in cases where the defendant has been legally and convincingly established to have committed a criminal conduct, but the judge may grant forgiveness without imposing a sentence. Novelty/Originality of this study: A concrete decision that has become jurisprudence as an implementation of Rechvorming with the discovery of construction law in the form of legal refinement (narrowing of the law) by judges in the perspective of Rechterlijk Pardon is the North-East Jakarta District Court Number 46/Pid/78/UT/Wanita and the North-East Jakarta District Court Decision Number 90/PID/1976/TIM. The Panel of Judges takes into account the seriousness of the offense, the offender's personal circumstances, or the circumstances surrounding the crime at the time it was committed when awarding a rechterlijk pardon. The existence of peace between the parties, justice, and humanity may also be taken into consideration by the judicial panel while deciding whether to prosecute or take no action of parties as an extra option for deciphering rechterlijk pardon. Keywords: Legal Discovery, Judge, Rechtlijk Pardon   ABSTRAK  Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses penemuan hukum yang digunakan hakim dalam menilai apakah akan memberikan pengampunan hukum (rechtlijk pardon) untuk menyelesaikan kasus pidana serta tantangan yang dihadapi hakim dalam melakukannya. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan dalam bentuk kajian literatur berupa peraturan hukum dan norma yang relevan adalah teknik penelitian ilmiah yang didasarkan pada logika yurisprudensi (doktrin) untuk mencari kebenaran dari perspektif normatif. Hasil Penelitian: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan beberapa kesimpulan berikut: Pertama, hakim dapat melakukan pembentukan hukum melalui metode penemuan hukum konstruksi yang berupa penyempitan hukum atau pemurnian hukum dalam menentukan rechterlijk pardon. Kedua, dalam melakukan revisi, pengadilan menggunakan proses penemuan hukum konstruksi berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Aplikasi Penelitian: Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman dan analisis yang lebih komprehensif mengingat kebijakan formulasi hukum pidana saat ini tidak mengadopsi nilai pengampunan sejati oleh hakim. Namun, hakim tetap memiliki kewenangan khusus dalam kasus di mana terdakwa secara sah dan meyakinkan terbukti melakukan tindakan pidana tetapi hakim dapat memberikan pengampunan tanpa menjatuhkan hukuman. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas Penelitian: Keputusan konkret yang telah menjadi yurisprudensi sebagai implementasi Rechvorming dengan penemuan hukum konstruksi dalam bentuk pemurnian hukum (penyempitan hukum) oleh hakim dalam perspektif Rechterlijk Pardon adalah Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 46/Pid/78/UT/Wanita dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 90/PID/1976/TIM. Majelis Hakim mempertimbangkan keseriusan pelanggaran, keadaan pribadi pelaku, atau keadaan di sekitar kejahatan pada saat itu dilakukan saat memberikan rechterlijk pardon. Keberadaan perdamaian antara pihak-pihak, keadilan, dan kemanusiaan juga dapat dipertimbangkan oleh majelis hakim saat memutuskan untuk menuntut atau tidak melakukan tindakan terhadap pihak-pihak sebagai opsi tambahan untuk menafsirkan rechterlijk pardon.  Kata Kunci: Penemuan Hukum, Hakim, Rechtlijk Pardon
Law Enforcement Against Morality Crimes through Restorative Justice by Gondomanan Police of Yogyakarta Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The goal of this study is to analyze the regulation of morality crimes and restorative justice in Indonesia, as well as the use of restorative justice by the Gondomanan Police of Yogyakarta to combat morality crimes.The statutory approach was applied in this study, which involved studying all laws and regulations in Indonesia relating to morality offences and restorative justice. The method of case approach is also used in this study, which examines cases involving morality offences. Restorative justice is the application of progressive legislation, in which the evolution of the purpose of punishment in Indonesia considers the interests of victim protection. The Gondomanan Police of Yogyakarta has been enforcing the law against morality crimes through restorative justice in accordance with Circular Letter of the Chief of Police No. 8 of 2018, which aims to bring together the perpetrators and victims, as well as several related parties, in the hopes of returning them to their original state. In this case, the police as investigators have given the victim enough chance to seek recompense from the criminal, and the culprit has consented to comply with the victim's request. The goal of this study is to learn more about how regulations for law enforcement against morality offences have evolved through restorative justice at the police level. The originality of this study stems from the fact that no cases of morals offences have ever been resolved by restorative justice.
The Relevance of Restorative Justice in Reducing Overcapacity in Correctional Institutions for Male and Female Prisoners Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny; Petrus Kanasius Kristiaga
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i1.23779

Abstract

Correctional institutions in Indonesia are facing severe overcrowding, with the number of inmates far exceeding facility capacities. This issue is alarming as it leads to numerous negative consequences, including poor living conditions and difficulties in rehabilitation. One possible solution is adopting a restorative justice approach, which shifts the focus of the criminal justice system from punitive measures to reconciliation and rehabilitation, ensuring justice for both victims and offenders rather than relying solely on imprisonment. This study examines the factors contributing to overcapacity in Class IIB Sleman Penitentiary and Class IIB Wonosari Penitentiary while also assessing the relevance of restorative justice in addressing this issue. Using an empirical normative methodology with a sociological juridical approach, the research incorporates statutory and structural analyses to understand the root causes of overcapacity. The findings reveal several key factors behind the overcrowding problem, including the large jurisdiction and high population of Sleman, rising crime rates, the absence of detention centers in Sleman and Wonosari, high recidivism rates, the exclusion of certain offences from restorative justice eligibility, transfers of inmates from other correctional units, and inmates choosing to serve prison sentences instead of paying fines. Restorative justice is highly relevant in addressing this issue as it provides an effective alternative to imprisonment. By focusing on conflict resolution, offender rehabilitation, and victim involvement, restorative justice aligns with the evolving priorities of Indonesia’s legal system. Implementing this approach more effectively could significantly reduce overcrowding in correctional facilities while simultaneously ensuring justice for victims, offenders, and society as a whole.