Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika
Mega Puspita Sari
Universitas Mataram
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD) Khairun Nisa; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Anindita Suliya Hangesti Mandra Kusuma; Deni Sutisna Deni Sutisna; Mega Puspita Sari
Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jipp.v6i1.158

Abstract

The issue of the character of the nation is still in the sharp spotlight by the community. The characters which at the same time include national culture cover various aspects of life. Even though it has long been echoed in every educational unit, character development seems to be the only writing that is always at the beginning of the lesson plan without any measurement tools.This research aims to explain the form of character assessment instruments developed for elementary school (SD) students. This type of research is development. The product produced from this development research is a character assessment instrument. The development design that will be used is the ADDIE instructional design. The results of internal validation of the instrument show that the questionnaire developed is very valid and can be used without improvement. External validation of the character assessment instrument for low classes, it is known that all statement items in the instrument are valid. The reliability of the low-class character assessment instrument was 0.986 in the first test and 0.984 in the second test. External validation of the character assessment instrument for high class, it is known that all statement items are valid. The reliability of the high-class character assessment instrument on the first test was 0.980 (very high) and on the second test was 0.979 (very high). Recommendations for development results are character assessment instruments that need to be tested in research on normal (offline) learning and still need to be evaluated (after being implemented) based on the input obtained from the response questionnaire or field notes on the observation sheet.
KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI AND NEWMAN PROCEDURE: ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU SD DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA Iva Nurmawanti; Vivi Rahmatul Hidayati; Hikmah Ramdhani Putri; Mega Puspita Sari
Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistik
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/lb.v4i3.465

Abstract

Numeracy is an essential skill that must be possessed to be successful in the 21st century. Numeration contains complex problems that link mathematics to everyday life. It is necessary to know the numeracy abilities of prospective elementary school teacher students as an initial effort to develop the numeracy abilities of future elementary school teachers. Apart from that, knowing what errors arise in solving numeracy questions is necessary to know what actions to use to develop the numeracy of prospective elementary school teachers. One theory that can be used to see student errors in solving numeracy questions is based on Newman's Errors Analysis (NEA). This research used a qualitative approach involving 154 students, of which 124 experienced errors. The research results showed that there were student errors in Reading Errors (R) at 9.68%, Comprehension Errors (C) at 27.42%, Transformation Errors (T) at 22.58%, Process Skills Errors (P) at 35, 48%, and Encoding Errors (E) of 4.84%. These errors are caused by students not being able to understand the basic concept of fractions, incorrect conceptual understanding regarding the concept of fractions, and students not understanding how to write fraction symbols and what two fractions have in common
Co-Authors Anindita SHM Kusuma Deni Sutisna Deni Sutisna Hikmah Ramdhani Putri Khairun Nisa Nurhasanah Nurhasanah Nurmawanti, Iva Vivi Rahmatul Hidayati