Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Manarul Qur'an: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Jurnal Hukum Islam
Akmal Bashori
Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an (UNSIQ) Jawa Tengah Di Wonosobo
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Epistemology of Fatwas on Digital Transaction in Indonesia Bashori, Akmal; Mutho'am, Mutho'am; Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh, Wan
Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 21 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi_v21i2_02

Abstract

The shift from conventional business transactions to digital business transactions, especially for the Muslim community in Indonesia,  necessitates a fast and reactive response from current laws. The theoretical argument that has been developed thus far is that the fatwa is the most appropriate legal tool for Muslim communities to respond to the rapid development of digital business. Nevertheless, do the existing fatwas fulfill legal needs as expected in this era of digital transactions? Hence, this paper discusses digital transaction fatwas within the framework of Islamic legal epistemology, especially fatwas from the National Shariah Council–Indonesian Ulama Council. The research method uses normative juridical with a conceptual and historical-uṣūliyah approach. This research finds that the contemporary fatwa epistemology of the National Shariah Council–Indonesian Ulama Council in terms of digital transactions employs istiṣlāhī arguments. This is shown by the proposition that fiqh rules are more dominant than textual ones. Moreover, the arguments in the fatwa of the National Shariah Council–Indonesian Ulama Council provide signs of benefit as the estuary of maqāṣid syarī'ah. The consistency of the use of legal methodology utilized by the National Shariah Council–Indonesian Ulama Council in fatwas on digital transactions is shown in the structure and utilization of al-nuṣūṣ al-shariah arguments, the opinions of ulama, and the rules of fiqh, which are expanded from the five rules of fiqh into eight rules. These fatwas are reliable and valid in terms of dictum and method, thus supporting the development of the current digital transactions.
Pengembangan Fikih Indonesia (Studi Terhadap Kajian Fiqih di Ma’had Aly Salafiyah Syafi’iyyah Situbondo) Akmal Bashori
Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 15 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi.v15i1.859

Abstract

Empiricism is a philosophy doctrine that emphasizes the role of experience in acquiring knowledge in excavation of Islamic law (istidlal) or known as al- tajribat al-hissiyat. This method departs from the induction field observations, and the reality of a society as the main source for legislation jurisprudence by using the senses and the intellect. Imam Shafi’i himself uses this method of digging the legal and produces two different opinions; qaulqadim and qauljaded. Similarly, Ma’had Aly Situbondo, Islamic legal thought the product was much influenced by the reality of Indonesian society. The results of this study found that Ma’had Aly (1) in the excavation law always look at the empirical reality (2) MA successfully develop jurisprudence in Indonesia by revitalizing the epistemology of classical Islamic law, the text diversification, expansion of the concept of ta’wil and reconstruction schools of thought (Madhab).
Otentisitas Ḥadīs Āḥād Dalam Diskursus Uṣūl al-Fiqh: Dialektika Mazhab Mutakallimin dan Ahnaf Bashori, Akmal; Marhumah, Marhumah
Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2023): SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al Qur'an dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syari'ah dan Hukum (FSH) UNSIQ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32699/syariati.v9i2.5506

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji tentang perdebatan seputar ḥadīs āhād di kalangan mazhab Ahnaf dan Mutakallimin. Mana yang dijadikan prioritas sebagai hujjah ḥadīs āhād ataukah qiyās? Di isini menariknya, karena mazhab Mutakallimin berpandangan ḥadīs āhād harus dijadikan hujjah dalam hukum Islam, sementara mazhab Ahnaf lebih memprioritaskan pengunaan qiyās daripada penggunaan ḥadīs āhād. Perbedaan tersebut berimplikasi juga pada produk hukum yang pada tataran iplikatifnya juga iterjadi perbedaan, seperti halnya pada lapangan fikih mu’amalat iatau hukum ekonomi syari’ah.
Co-Authors Afriadi, Putra Akhmad Jakfar Arif Sugitanata Karimullah, Suud Sarim Marhumah Marhumah Muhammad Hasyied Abdurrasyied mutho'am, mutho'am Mutho’am, Mutho’am Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh, Wan Sugitanata, Arif Supriyadi