Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Notary's Responsibility for Signing A Blank Deed of Agreement Farahiani, Sita; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 3 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i3.8987

Abstract

The background is the practice of agreements for building shophouses which are stated in the Deed of Agreement through blank forms made before a Notary. The issue that arises then is whether the agreement can be accepted in positive law. The problem in this journal discusses how the Notary's Responsibility for the Deed of Agreement through blank forms and How the Legal Protection for the injured party is for the Deed that is canceled, which aims to gain an understanding regarding the validity of the Deed of Agreement. The method used is Normative Jurisprudence, Conceptual Approach Type, Using Data Collection Methods with Literature studies related to Laws and Regulations, and the Research Specifications used are Descriptive Techniques that focus on solving legal problems and events. The results of this study explain that the Notary's responsibility in making a deed of agreement through blank forms is very large, including civil, criminal, and administrative responsibilities. Legal protection for parties to a deed of agreement that is canceled by law is based on the principle of justice and legal certainty guaranteed by statutory regulations.
Legal Protection for Land Rights Holders in Land Disputes Over Customary Land Based on Girik Case Study of PK Decision Number 1169 Pk/Pdt/2023 Firmansyah, Melania Indiana Putri; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 3 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i3.9251

Abstract

This thesis analyzes the complex land issues in Indonesia, particularly concerning adat land disputes based on girik ownership in the face of a dominant, centralized national land law system. As an agrarian nation with diverse traditional land ownership systems, Indonesia frequently encounters conflicts between adat rights and state or private interests. Girik, a traditional proof of land control, is often not fully recognized by the modern legal system, even though Law No. 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles has accommodated ulayat rights. This research focuses on the dispute between Lumin Tuningtyas (girik holder) and Desyanto (Certificate of Ownership/SHM holder) in East Jakarta. The case highlights the discrepancy between customary law recognition and positive law. Lumin Tuningtyas filed a lawsuit based on inherited girik ownership, while Desyanto defended his ownership based on an SHM registered with the National Land Agency (BPN). Although the District Court initially granted part of Lumin Tuningtyas's claim, the decision was overturned at the appellate level, and the Supreme Court rejected Lumin Tuningtyas's cassation and judicial review (PK) requests. In its PK decision No. 1169 PK/PDT/2023, the Supreme Court affirmed that a certificate registered with the BPN is the legitimate proof of ownership, while girik is only considered proof of control. This ruling underscores the necessity of a multidimensional approach to adat land disputes, one that not only relies on positive legal instruments but also considers the historical, anthropological, and sociological aspects of indigenous communities. This thesis argues that court decisions, which tend to be centralized and state-oriented, need to be transformed into a legal paradigm that is more responsive to the rights of indigenous communities and the principle of substantive justice. This research aims to dismantle less responsive legal practices and encourage systemic change in handling land disputes in Indonesia, in order to uphold justice and build a more humane legal system.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa Untuk Mendapatkan Pelayananan Kesehatan Di Indonesia Indriawan, Denny; Wahyudi, Setya; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4322

Abstract

Masih banyak ODGJ yang masih menghadapi kendala signifikan dalam mengakses pelayanan kesehatan. Kendala ini meliputi stigma sosial, kekurangan fasilitas kesehatan yang memadai, serta kurangnya pengetahuan dan pemahaman di kalangan tenaga medis mengenai cara menangani pasien dengan gangguan jiwa. Selain itu, masalah administratif dan birokrasi dalam sistem kesehatan juga sering kali menjadi penghalang bagi mereka untuk mendapatkan perawatan yang diperlukan. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengetahui Bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) dalam mengakses pelayanan kesehatan di Indonesia dan Bagaimana proses penilaian dan pengambilan keputusan dalam kasus yang melibatkan Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) yang tidak mampu membuat keputusan mereka sendiri dalam pelayanan kesehatan.   Metode penelitian ini yaitu Yuridis Normatif. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) dalam mengakses pelayanan kesehatan di Indonesia diatur dalam peraturan  perundangan  di  bidang  kesehatan  yang  telah disusun  oleh  pemerintah  mulai  dari  Undang-Undang  Nomor  18  Tahun  2014  tentang Kesehatan  Jiwa. Penilaian dan pengambilan keputusan dalam kasus ODGJ yang tidak mampu membuat keputusan sendiri memerlukan pendekatan yang sangat hati-hati, dengan melibatkan penilaian medis yang cermat, perlindungan hak-hak pasien, serta pertimbangan terhadap prinsip-prinsip etika medis dan hukum.
Optimalisasi Penggunaan Bantaran Sungai yang Dihuni Secara Turun Temurun Serta Diklaim Kepemilikanya dalam Konteks Pertanahan Utami, Wiji Nurfi; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i10.16848

Abstract

Tanah di sepanjang sungai termasuk dalam kategori kawasan lindung yang memerlukan perlindungan khusus. Sempadan sungai yang menjadi satu kesatuan dengan sungai merupakan tanah Negara, namun pada kenyataannya masyarakan memanfaatkan tanah tersebut menjadi tempat hunian dan ditempati secara turun temurun. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek hukum penggunaan tanah di bantaran sungai yang termasuk dalam kategori kawasan lindung, yang sering kali digunakan oleh masyarakat sebagai hunian secara turun temurun. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dan karakteristik preskriptif. Dari hasil kajian didapati bahwa pemberian izin rekomendasi tanah di wilayah bantaran sungai harus memperhatikan keseimbangan antara kebutuhan masyarakat dengan keberlanjutan lingkungan, serta memastikan bahwa tindakan yang diambil tidak merugikan lingkungan hidup. Perlindungan lingkungan dan keberlanjutan ekosistem sungai merupakan prioritas utama dalam pengelolaan sempadan sungai. Perlunya pendekatan hukum yang adil dan transparan sesuai dengan Pancasila dalam menangani proses pensertifikatan tanah di bantaran sungai agar dapat mengatasi hambatan-hambatan yang muncul, seperti proses permohonan yang lambat dan minimnya pengetahuan masyarakat terkait prosedur hukum yang berlaku.
Legal Implications on the Transfer of Land Rights Due To Breach of Agreement Deeds Made Before a Notary Based on Land Registration Provisions Fadillah, Putri; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 4 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i4.9773

Abstract

And legal protection of authentic deeds that function as evidence. Authentic deeds are very essential in civil relations to prove legal acts and determine rights and obligations, including in the context of agreements or contracts. The case study focuses on Decision Number 408 / Pdt / 2023, which involves a shophouse construction and profit sharing agreement. The Plaintiffs made a Deed of Shophouse Construction and Profit Sharing Agreement Number 28 dated November 14, 2012 before Notary & PPAT Yeni Pujihartini,  S.H., M.Kn. (Defendant II), with Johan (Defendant I) as the developer. The legal problem that arose was the alleged negligence / violation of procedures by the Notary because the Plaintiffs were asked to sign a blank paper and then the contents of the Deed they received (the number of shophouses written as 4) were different from the initial agreement. Another main problem was the default by Defendant I who did not complete the construction and hand over the shophouses to the Plaintiff. This case highlights the significance of authentic deeds as strong evidence and simultaneously underscores the responsibility of Notaries to ensure the formal and material truth of the deed in accordance with the wishes of the parties and applicable regulations. The breach of contract lawsuit filed with the Sengeti District Court emphasizes the need for Notary integrity in carrying out their official duties to maintain the evidentiary value of the deed and provide maximum legal protection for the public. In an increasingly advanced era, the role of notaries is increasingly needed by the public who will undertake legal actions, one of which is in making agreements. This relates to the need for the availability of strong evidence, in the event of a future dispute between the parties. Therefore, in carrying out their official duties, Notaries in providing their services must comply with the provisions of laws and regulations.
Responsibilities of the Land Deed Making Office in the Preparation of a Sale Purchase Deed on a Guarantee Without the Consent of the Object Owner Bildia, Zahra; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 4 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i4.9770

Abstract

The responsibility of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) in ensuring the validity of land sale and purchase transactions in Indonesia, as well as the legal consequences in the event of negligence. As a state based on the rule of law based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, Indonesia requires authentic evidence to ensure legal certainty, order, and justice. Authentic deeds, drawn up by public officials such as notaries and PPATs, play a crucial role in every legal act, including land transactions. Judicial Review Decision Number 47 PK/Pdt/2025, in which the PPAT allegedly abused his authority and made a deed that did not comply with procedures, resulted in losses for one of the parties. The research method used was normative juridical, with a conceptual and legislative approach, as well as a literature study to analyze secondary data such as books, journals, and regulations. The results of the study indicate that PPATs have a responsibility to ensure the legality of transactions and prevent future disputes. Negligence in the administrative process, such as not promptly transferring the title to a certificate, can create legal uncertainty. The legal consequences of unlawful acts by PPATs can render the deed they have drawn up null and void and trigger disputes. This study concludes that legal protection for buyers in good faith is crucial. Therefore, improvements to the land administration system and closer collaboration between Land Deed Officials (PPAT) and the National Land Agency (BPN) are needed to create legal certainty and protect community rights.
Principles of Caution by Notaries Regarding Transfer of Land Rights Based on A Name-Border Agreement from the Perspective of Land Registration Regulations Artamira, Nabela Maulinda; Handayani, Sri Wahyu
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 7, No 4 (2025): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v7i4.9772

Abstract

not recognized by the Civil Code but grow and develop in society. This practice has become a fairly common phenomenon, especially in regional areas. a popular tourist area, where many foreigners are interested in owning property but are prevented by applicable legal provisions. Agrarian law strictly prohibits foreigners from owning land with freehold rights. This not only has the potential to harm the country financially, but also creates legal uncertainty that can hamper the long-term investment climate. From a public policy perspective, the existence of name loan agreements reflects a gap between market needs and the existing legal framework. A comprehensive study is needed to formulate policies that can accommodate global economic dynamics without compromising the fundamental principles of national agrarian law. The research method used is normative juridical, the type of approach used is a conceptual approach and a legislative approach, the data analysis method used is a literature study using qualitative analysis. The results of this study are that the position of the nominee agreement also has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and social conflict, especially if there are dual claims to land ownership, in practice, the court tends to reject the Nominee agreement because it violates the principle of nationality which is the main basis of the Basic Agrarian Law. The principle of caution has an important role for Notaries in carrying out their duties and authorities, so that Notaries must play a role in providing legal counseling to the parties regarding the contents that will be stated in the form of a Deed so that in the implementation of the principle of accuracy or caution must be carried out in the process of making a deed.