Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

STUDY COMPARATIF PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM FIKIH JINAYAH DAN HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL Noercholis Rafid. A; Nazaruddin
Jurnal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Al-Ahkam Volume 4 Nomor 2 September Tahun 2022
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Sinjai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47435/al-ahkam.v4i2.1236

Abstract

Study Comparatif Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Fikih Jinayah Dan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan penerapan restorative justice dalam fikih jinayah dan hukum pidana Islam. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pustaka. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan teologi normatif dan pendekatan yuridis. Terdapat dua sumber data dalam penelitian ini yaitu data primer dan data sekunder, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaiman penerapan Restorative padaFikih Jinayah Dan Hukum Pidana Nasional yang merupakan penyelesaian perkara pidana yang melibatkan korban dan tersangka ditempuh secara damai. Adapun Metode Penelitian Permasalahan hukum yang terjadi dalam masyarakat umumnya diselesaikan dengan jalur hukum pidana melalui proses penyidikan, penahanan dan putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertama penerapan restorative justice dalam fikih jinayah sangat kompleks dibandingkan dengan hukum pidana nasional. Kedua fikih jinayah mengutamakan perdamaian di atas hukum sehingga hukum pidana adalah tujuan akhir. Sedangkan hukum pidana nasional terkadang masih menjadikan hukum pidana sebaga tujuan utama dalam penegakan hukum.
ANALISIS SADD DZARIAH TERHADAP DISPENSASI NIKAH PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PAREPARE Noercholis Rafid. A
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2020): DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (750.765 KB) | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v18i2.1850

Abstract

Abstrak : Penelitian ini membahas tentang analisis sadd dzariah terhadap dispensasi nikah pada putusan Pengadilan Agama Parepare. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan dispensasi kawin. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian lapangan dengan menggunakan pendekatan teologis normatif, yaitu pendekatan yang merujuk pada dalil-dali qur’an dan hadis dan merujuk pada perundang-undang. Yang berlaku. Dispensasi nikah diberikan oleh hakim demi untuk mencegah terjadinya perbuatan yang dilarang agama berdasarkan fakta-fakta hukum yang ada di pengadilan.
Maslahah Evaluation of Judges' Sentences for Domestic Violence Crimes at the Majene District Court Noercholis Rafid. A; Fajri, Muhammad; Noor, Khairun Nizam Mohd.
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mh.vi.37034

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the factors that contributed to the judge's lenient sentence towards a defendant charged with domestic violence at the Majene District Court. Additionally, the study sought to examine the maslahah value inherent in the judge's decision. The study conducted was normative research that involved analyzing the decisions made by judges. Additionally, interviews were conducted with multiple judges to gain insights into their decision-making processes. The study employed a normative syar'i approach to examine judges' decisions by utilizing maslahah analysis from Islamic legal theory. According to the study's findings, the judge's decision was influenced by the maslahah value, which prioritized the restoration of the perpetrator's household. This was due to the perpetrator's expression of regret and the establishment of peace between the involved parties. The statement suggests that there is a comparison between the obligation of maintaining a household and the imposition of prison sentences ranging from 1-10 years on perpetrators who are responsible for victimizing their wives. The imposition of prison sentences can have negative consequences for both the offender and society as a whole, as it impacts their ability to meet basic needs.
Menilai Kesetaraan dan Akurasi Qibla on Compass Aplikasi Miqat terhadap Metode Azimuth Geodesi: Analisis Galat Absolut, Bland-Altman, dan TOST Andi Jusran Kasim; Rahman Subha; Fatri Sagita; Noercholis Rafid. A; Maryam U
Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): BORNEO: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/borneo.v6i1.4532

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy level of the Miqat Play Store application, tested in 36 mosques by comparing the results with the geodetic azimuth reference coordinates WGS84. The method used is quantitative observational, with measurements taken three times at each location using the Miqat application on various types of Android smartphones. The results of the analysis show a difference between the geodetic azimuth and Miqat with an absolute error between -0.7278° and 0.6523°, an average error of -0.19295° and a standard deviation of 0.1982°. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the difference between the two methods was within acceptable limits, with an upper limit (ULA) of 0.1956° and a lower limit (LLA) of -0.5815°. The TOST equivalence test showed an average difference of 0.193°, which was smaller than the tolerance of ±0.5°, so the two methods could be considered mathematically equivalent. This study concludes that Miqat is suitable for use as an aid in determining the azimuth of the compass qibla in controlled environmental conditions and with good magnetic sensor calibration.
Transformasi Kebijakan Pidana Siber Menuju Keamanan dan Keadilan Digital Fatri Sagita; Ardiansyah; Noercholis Rafid. A
Prosiding SISFOTEK Vol 9 No 1 (2025): SISFOTEK IX 2025
Publisher : Ikatan Ahli Informatika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Indonesia’s criminal law in addressing cybersecurity and personal data protection amid the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the analysis examines the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (Law No. 11 of 2008) and the Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 27 of 2022), supported by secondary data from legislation, scholarly works, and official reports. The findings show that the criminal law framework remains fragmented, reactive, and unprepared for AI-driven cyber offenses. Overlapping institutional authority, the absence of an independent supervisory body, and limited digital forensic capacity undermine enforcement and legal certainty. Normatively, the study concludes that reforming Indonesia’s cyber penal policy is essential to extend criminal liability to algorithmic offenses, establish an independent supervisory authority, and integrate national digital forensic systems. Such reforms align with the principle of criminal law as ultima ratio, ensuring justice, security, and protection of citizens’ digital rights.
Perbedaan dan Persinggungan Konseptual antara Falsafah Syariah dan Falsafah Tasyri’: Conceptual Differences and Intersections between Falsafah al-Sharī‘ah and Falsafah al-Tashrī‘ Syamsul Ilmi; Rahmatiah HL; Lomba Sultan; Noercholis Rafid. A
QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/jhki.v6i2.1857

Abstract

Philosophical studies, particularly in Islamic legal philosophy, continue to generate dynamic intellectual discourse among scholars of Islamic law. One significant area of inquiry concerns the relationship between the philosophy of sharia (falsafah al-sharī‘ah) and the philosophy of legislation (falsafah al-tashrī‘). The urgency of distinguishing and understanding the points of convergence between these two concepts becomes increasingly evident when Islamic law is confronted with contemporary challenges. This study focuses on two main objectives: (1) comparing the scope, objects, and approaches of falsafah al-sharī‘ah and falsafah al-tashrī‘; and (2) providing a clear conceptual framework to prevent overlap and terminological confusion between these two concepts in the study of Islamic legal philosophy. This research employs a qualitative library-based method using normative-theological and conceptual-comparative approaches. Data were collected from classical and contemporary Islamic legal literature and analyzed using descriptive-analytical techniques. The findings indicate that falsafah al-sharī‘ah is oriented toward legal values, objectives, and wisdom (maqāṣid), whereas falsafah al-tashrī‘ focuses on the legislative process and the methodology of legal formulation. Both intersect within the domains of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and uṣūl al-fiqh, which function as a bridge between ideal values and the normative formulation of Islamic law. This study contributes conceptually to clarifying the epistemological foundations of Islamic legal philosophy and its relevance to the development of contemporary Islamic law.