Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.829
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Ilmu Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research Nivedana : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bahasa Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran DINAMIKA ILMU: Jurnal Pendidikan Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam Studies in English Language and Education Journal of Arabic Language and Literature Studies Tropicrops : Indonesian Journal of Tropical Crops Metaphor Language Circle : Journal of Language and Literature Muwazah: Jurnal Kajian Gender
Arina Rohmatika
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Dinamika Ilmu

 1 
Penggunaan AREL pada Penyampaian Argumen di Klub Debat Bahasa Inggris STKIP PGRI Ponorogo Rohmatika, Arina; Syamsuddin, Syamsuddin
Dinamika Ilmu Dinamika Ilmu Vol 14 No 2, December 2014
Publisher : IAIN Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/di.v14i2.1

Abstract

The English debat organization is one of the most popular students’ activity units at STKIP PGRI Ponorogo. Many students of English department join this club. The skill of debate of the students in the English club is not improved yet. The objective of this study was to give an appropriate way of giving argument of a debate by using AREL. AREL is Argument, Reasoning, Evidance and Link Back. This is a classroom action research. The approach of this study is qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative data were gained by using questionnaire and observation. The quantitative data were gained from the result of the students’ speaking test both pre-test, post-test I, and post-test II. The subject of the study was the members of the English debate club of STKIP PGRI Ponorogo consisting of 19 students. The data collection technique used in this study was observation. The observation, then, also was enriched by recording and taking-note techniques. Data, then, was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. In pre-test, many students still made many mistakes in presenting the argument. Based on the pre-test data, the pre-treatment was done. In post-test I, some students made an improvement in presenting a good enough organization of an argument, but it was not good yet. In post-test II of the next treatment, it shows a better result
Penggunaan AREL pada Penyampaian Argumen di Klub Debat Bahasa Inggris STKIP PGRI Ponorogo Rohmatika, Arina; Syamsuddin, Syamsuddin
Dinamika Ilmu: Jurnal Pendidikan Dinamika Ilmu Vol 14 No 2, December 2014
Publisher : IAIN Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (79.818 KB) | DOI: 10.21093/di.v14i2.1

Abstract

The English debat organization is one of the most popular students’ activity units at STKIP PGRI Ponorogo. Many students of English department join this club. The skill of debate of the students in the English club is not improved yet. The objective of this study was to give an appropriate way of giving argument of a debate by using AREL. AREL is Argument, Reasoning, Evidance and Link Back. This is a classroom action research. The approach of this study is qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative data were gained by using questionnaire and observation. The quantitative data were gained from the result of the students’ speaking test both pre-test, post-test I, and post-test II. The subject of the study was the members of the English debate club of STKIP PGRI Ponorogo consisting of 19 students. The data collection technique used in this study was observation. The observation, then, also was enriched by recording and taking-note techniques. Data, then, was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. In pre-test, many students still made many mistakes in presenting the argument. Based on the pre-test data, the pre-treatment was done. In post-test I, some students made an improvement in presenting a good enough organization of an argument, but it was not good yet. In post-test II of the next treatment, it shows a better result
Co-Authors Ali Imron Dessy Noor Farida Endah Sri Redjeki Eny Susilowati Farida Yufarlina Rosita Ika Yoga Ikke Dewi Pratama Joni Rusdiana MZ, Isniyatun Nizwah Nestiani Hutami Nur Kafid NURUL HIDAYAH Pipin Devi Arista Pratiwi, Rhesa Zuhriya Puput Arianto, Rahmad Jumadi Rangga Maysa Putra Rhesa Zuhriya Briyan Pratiwi Rhesa Zuhriya Pratiwi Rina Hastuti Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Samsudin, Wahyu Widodo SF Luthfie Arguby Purnomo Susilowati, Eny Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin, Syamsuddin