Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Akademika Journal of Governance and Public Policy Generasi Emas: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini MIMBAR : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Politik Constitutionale Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary NALAR FIQH: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Tri Endah Karya Lestiyani
UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Constitutionale

 1 
The Theory of Justice and Ultra petita Decisions: A Critical Analysis of Judicial Review in the Constitutional Court Yandy, Eza Tri; Lestiyani, Tri Endah Karya
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Issue In progress (January 2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i1.3946

Abstract

Under Law Number 24 of 2003, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia issues three types of decisions: inadmissibility, acceptance, and rejection. Over time, the Court introduced additional categories, including conditional constitutional and conditional unconstitutional decisions. As legal disputes have become increasingly complex, the Court has also issued ultra petita rulings, granting decisions beyond the scope of the petitioner's request. This research examines the evolution of justice theories and their relevance to the ultra petita decisions in judicial review cases. Using a normative legal research approach with conceptual and case-based methodologies, this research analyzes legislative texts, books, journals, and research reports through qualitative descriptive techniques. The findings reveal varying philosophical perspectives on justice: Plato views justice as intrinsic harmony, Aristotle differentiates between general and specific (proportional) justice, and John Rawls emphasizes fairness through the "original position" and "veil of ignorance." The ultra petita ruling in Case 90/PUU-XXI/2023 altered the presidential and vice-presidential age requirement by adding the qualification of previously holding an elected regional position. Meanwhile, Case 60/PUU-XXII/2024 redefined the regional head nomination threshold, setting aside the 20% DPRD seat or 25% vote requirement. Both decisions reflect procedural and substantive justice, ensuring fair outcomes. However, to prevent judicial overreach and uphold legal certainty, clear regulations on the Constitutional Court’s authority in issuing ultra petita decisions are essential..
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Adawiyah, Robi'Atul Alfisyahri, Nuriah Aslami, Fathia Pirman, Riko Rasito Rasito Sukmawati, Nur Sulhani, Sulhani Sundari, Cici Suranto Suranto Syauket, Amalia Yandy, Eza Yandy, Eza Tri