Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

PENGARUH RELIGIOUS COMMITMENT TERHADAP MINAT EKONOMI SYARIAH DI KALANGAN SANTRI Hidayatullah, Nur; Ayu, Navirta; Nur Lestari, Desy
Izdihar: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 5 No. 01 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32764/izdihar.v5i01.5688

Abstract

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Religious Commitment terhadap minat ekonomi syariah di kalangan santri. Penelitian ini dilakukan di pondok pesantren An Nur Ngrukem yang santri-santrinya berstatus sebagai siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) yang dikolaborasikan dengan Religious Commitment sebagai variabe Independen dan Minat ekonomi syariah sebagai variabel Dependen. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti mengolah data sebanyak 70 kuesioner atau angket yang telah diolah dan diuji menggunakan SPSS. Hasil dari penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa Religious Commitment berpengaruh terhadap minat ekonomi syariah pada kalangan santri, variabel sikap berpengaruh terhadap minat ekonomi syariah, norma subjektif juga berpengaruh terhadap minat ekonomi syariah, dan kontrol perilaku tidak berpengaruh terhadap minat ekonomi syariah. Sedangkan dari hasil uji F disimpulkan bahwasanya secara simultan dapat disimpulkan terdapat pengaruh dari semua variabel terhadap variabel minat.
DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN SEWA-MENYEWA SECARA SEPIHAK Hidayatullah, Nur; Arifudin, Nur; Damanik, Amsari
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): FEBRUARI
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Unilateral cancellation of the agreement before the end of the agreement period is categorized as unlawful. In some cases of unilateral cancellation of lease agreements submitted to the District Court, there are differences in legal considerations by the Panel of Judges in interpreting elements of unlawful acts in unilaterally canceling agreements resulting in disparity in decisions. The research method used is doctrinal research based on a legal issue that is examined in several District Court decisions with a statutory approach and relevant legal theories. The results showed that the disparity in judges' decisions in Decision Number 760/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Dps, Decision Number 404/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg, and Decision Number 196/Pdt.G/2020/PN. Jkt.Sel in its legal consideration, the Panel of Judges considered that not all unilateral cancellation of agreements can be categorized as unlawful acts based on certain things that prove that there is strong evidence and clear reasons for one party to cancel the lease agreement unilaterally. Efforts to minimize the disparity of the three decisions are the establishment of a more specific agreement clause that regulates provisions related to matters that cause the cancellation of the lease agreement, the Panel of Judges is more optimal in assessing the facts revealed in the trial, the use of jurisprudence and improving guidance and evaluation for judges by the Supreme Court.