Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

SISTEM BAGI HASIL DALAM AKAD MUDHARABAH PADA PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA PEMBUATAN BATU BATA DI ALASBULUH WONGSOREJO BANYUWANGI Imam Fawaid; Abd. Rahman Saleh; Misba Huddin; Sri Windari
Iltizam : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Iltizam : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/iltizam.v2i2.6691

Abstract

One form of cooperation that is often used in the context of Islamic economics is the mudharabah agreement. One party acts as the capital owner, and the other party as the business manager. Brick making is a business sector that has great potential, especially in rural areas. Therefore, the problem arises of how to implement the profit sharing system in the mudharabah agreement in the brick making agreement in Alasbuluh Wongsorejo Banyuwangi? The type of research used is field research, that is, researchers go directly into the field to conduct research so they can see and understand the objects to be discussed. The results of this research indicate that the profit sharing system in the mudharabah agreement in the brick making agreement in Alasbuluh Wongsorejo is an application of cooperation between capital owners and managers. The capital provided is in the form of a loan with an agreement at the beginning of the contract. And the profit sharing system in the mudharabah agreement in the brick-making cooperation agreement in Alasbuluh Wongsorejo Banyuwangi in its implementation is not fully in accordance with Islamic law, one of the things that is appropriate is the terms of a consensual agreement. Cooperation agreement activities carried out by the community in Alasbuluh Wongsorejo Banyuwangi, in its implementation there is a clear concept of cooperation and is justified by sharia as long as the business activity does not conflict with the values ​​of Islamic sharia
Tinjauan Hukum Kedaulatan Pangan Melalui Kemandirian Petani Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pemberdayaan Petani Jhon Piter Situmeang; Abd. Rahman Saleh
Lex Et Lustitia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Moch. Sroedji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Farmer Protection and Empowerment aims to realize the sovereignty and independence of farmers in order to improve the welfare, quality, and better life; protect farmers from crop failure and price risks; provide agricultural infrastructure and facilities needed in developing agricultural businesses; develop agricultural financing institutions that serve the interests of agricultural businesses; increase the ability and capacity of farmers and farmer institutions in running productive, advanced, modern, value-added, competitive, market-share and sustainable farming businesses; and provide legal certainty for the implementation of farming businesses. To be able to escape dependence on imported food and alleviate farmers from poverty, it is time for Indonesia to build food independence and sovereignty, by utilizing the diversity of biological resources, restoring local food diversity, and building agricultural-based industries in rural areas. Building food independence and sovereignty is a strategic instrument in efforts to alleviate farmers from poverty. In the implementation of food security programs, the fulfillment of food needs in several sectors still depends on international trade. Building food independence is the best strategy to get out of the food crisis. As an agricultural country with diverse biological resources (biodiversity), Indonesia has significant potential to produce sufficient food. Furthermore, Indonesia has a variety of local foods to support national food diversification
Tukar Tambah Perhiasan Emas Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Abd. Rahman; R. Fakhrurrazi; Muhammad Jufri; Alif Akhbarul Muslim
Al-Hukmi : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Al-Hukmi : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah dan Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam, Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/alhukmi.v7i1.10412

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the practice of gold jewelry trade-in transactions at Srikandi Store in Asembagus District, Situbondo Regency, and to examine their conformity with the principles of Islamic Economic Law. This research employed a qualitative approach with a field research design. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation involving parties directly related to the implementation of gold jewelry trade-in transactions. The data were analyzed descriptively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings show that the trade-in transaction begins when customers submit their old gold jewelry to the store for evaluation based on its weight, condition, and characteristics. After the value of the old jewelry is determined and agreed upon, customers select new jewelry. The value of the old gold is then calculated as part of the payment for the new jewelry. When the price of the new jewelry exceeds the value of the old gold, customers are required to pay the difference. Conversely, when the value of the old jewelry is higher, the remaining amount is returned to the customer. From the perspective of Islamic Economic Law, the transaction should not automatically be categorized as a direct exchange of gold for gold involving an additional payment that constitutes riba al-fadl. Based on the actual mechanism, the practice can be understood as a series of two separate sale and purchase transactions: the sale of old gold jewelry by the customer to the store and the purchase of new gold jewelry by the customer. Therefore, the validity of the transaction depends on the clarity and separation of the contracts, transparent price determination, transfer of ownership, mutual consent, and payment mechanisms that prevent elements of riba, gharar, and injustice