Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : SASI

The Meaning of Halal in The Food Industry in The Metaverse Era (A Comparison) Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina; Sari, Nuzulia Kumala; Adonara, Firman Floranta; Tektona, Rahmadi Indra; Driss, Bakhouya
SASI Volume 30 Issue 2, June 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v30i2.1906

Abstract

Introduction: The background of this research is that there are still many food products that have not been halal certified, even though the government through the Halal Product Guarantee Agency (BPJPH) has provided convenience in registering halal products online with free assistance. Especially in this metaverse era, where technology has developed rapidly so that the use of digital technology should be able to encourage development through the halal industry.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study, firstly, is to know and understand the meaning of halal in both Islamic law and the Civil Code. Second, understanding the halal industry in the metaverse era in terms of the theory of utilitarianism and Maqashid Sharia.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical method with a legal-statutory approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: The results of this study are: First, that halal in Islamic Law and the Civil Code have different contexts, but have a similar meaning, namely referring to something that is permitted and not prohibited by law. Second, the halal industry based on utilitarianism has utility value both for business actors who register their food products, as well as for the general public as consumers. Furthermore, based on Maqashid Sharia, halal food is included in the category of protecting the soul (nafs) and protecting the mind (aql).
The Interplay of Customary Law and Labor Regulations: A Comparative Legal Pluralism Study in Indonesia and Algeria Febriharini, Mahmuda Pancawisma; Kunarto, Kunarto; Driss, Bakhouya
SASI Volume 32 Issue 1, March 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3483

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the interaction between customary law and national labor regulations in Indonesia and Algeria through the lens of legal pluralism. The research is motivated by the persistent coexistence of formal state law and traditional practices in shaping employment relations, which is particularly evident in societies with strong communal and religious traditions. Both Indonesia and Algeria represent cases where historical legacies of colonialism, post-independence political choices, and enduring social structures have produced distinctive forms of legal pluralism in labor relations.Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of this research is to compare how legal pluralism operates in the two countries to regulate employment relations, resolve labor disputes, and accommodate customary norms within national frameworks.Methods of the Research: This study applies a normative legal research method with a comparative legal approach. Primary data sources include statutory regulations such as the Indonesian Labour Law Number 13 of 2003 (as amended by the Job Creation Law 2020 and Law Number 6 of 2023) and the Algerian Labour Code (Law Number 90-11/1990), while secondary data are drawn from academic literature, case studies, and reports from international institutions like the ILO. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-comparative technique to identify similarities, differences, and integration patterns between customary law and national labor regulations.Results of the Research: The findings reveal that both Indonesia and Algeria institutionalize pluralism by formally recognizing certain customary practices, such as oral employment agreements in Algeria and community-based contractual practices in Indonesia. This novelty lies in demonstrating how pluralism is not merely a social phenomenon but also a legally recognized mechanism for regulating labor relations and dispute resolution. This study advances existing knowledge by showing that legal pluralism provides a flexible and context-sensitive framework for labor law, balancing global standards with local legitimacy.