Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A VERSION APPLICATION FOR A CHILD OPPOSITE THE LAW Azmiati Zuliah; Dian Hardian Silalahi; Adi Putra; Rilawadi Sahputra
Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis Vol 3, No 3 (2022): Social Sciences, Education and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/ijsseh.v3i3.2793

Abstract

AbstractAll children are entitled to live, to grow, to thrive and to be protected from violence and discrimination. In reality, though, the number of children with legal problems increases significantly over the years. The treatment of children in trouble with the law suggests that they are often treated as "miniatures" of criminal adults. The study aims to assess the capacity of law enforcement officials, including police, prosecutors, judges, government, and related agencies. Recognizing the needs of these institutions, we implemented an alternating diversion of restorative justice approach. The government has projected the rupiah's exchange rate at rp9,100 per dollar in the Jakarta interbank spot market on Monday as investors bought the local unit on Wednesday. The study USES a descriptive qualitative study method with a prescriptive quality of research with an empirical approach and USES primary and secondary data. The data gathered is analyzed by organizing the data into categories, detailing them in units, and drawing conclusions that are easily understood. The results of this study have concluded that understanding with law enforcement officers especially at the police level is better because the completion of children's cases outside the law can be resolved at the investigative level. Most of the whistleblower (90,48%) Understanding about complainers of judges, prosecutors, police and lawyers, including ngos, social work units and bapas staff.Keyword: diversion, restorative justice, son
DETERMINATION OF SUSPECTS IN CORRUPTION CRIMES BY POLICE INVESTIGATORS FROM A DUE PROCESS OF LAW PERSPECTIVE Basar Achmad S Purba; Andi Maysarah; Dian Hardian Silalahi
NOMOI Law Review Vol 7, No 1 (2026): May Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v7i1.31051

Abstract

The extensive authority of Police investigators in determining suspects of corruption crimes often intersects with issues of arbitrariness and fundamental human rights protection. This study aims to analyze the reconstruction of suspect determination procedures based on Law Number 20 of 2025 and its juridical implications. As a theoretical and practical reference for legal practitioners, this research underscores the urgency of procedural compliance to ensure legal certainty. Employing normative legal research with statute and conceptual approaches , the discussion highlights a paradigm shift from broad discretion to mandatory scientific evidence, specifically requiring definitive state loss audits and "Special Case Exposure" involving external experts. The analysis confirms that the validity of suspect determination strictly depends on these limitative boundaries. The conclusion asserts that any violation constitutes an excess of power, rendering the suspect status null and void and the evidence invalid (fruit of the poisonous tree). Consequently, this research suggests that law enforcement must strictly adhere to these procedural safeguards to uphold the supremacy of due process in corruption eradication.