Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Educational Landscape in Indonesia in 2023: Challenges and Opportunities Usman Jayadi; Arman Harahap; Aslan Aslan
International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijedl.v2i2.266

Abstract

This article examines the state of education in Indonesia in 2023, focusing on both the challenges and opportunities facing the system. Education in Indonesia has undergone significant transformation over the past decade, but several barriers remain, such as disparities in access, quality, and infrastructure between urban and rural areas. Despite these challenges, recent reforms and the increased use of technology have provided promising avenues for improvement. The study analyzes the national education policies, including the impact of the Merdeka Curriculum, and evaluates the role of digital learning platforms in addressing the educational needs of Indonesia’s vast population. Additionally, the article highlights key issues such as teacher training, student engagement, and education for sustainable development. By examining both the progress made and areas requiring further attention, this paper offers a comprehensive view of the Indonesian educational system in 2023. The findings suggest that while substantial improvements have been made, systemic inequities and the rapid pace of technological integration pose both challenges and opportunities for educators, policymakers, and students alike.
The Role of Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) in Shaping Indonesia’s Digital Learning Policy: A Vision for Educational Reform in the Prabowo–Gibran Era Usman Jayadi
International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijedl.v3i6.354

Abstract

This study explores the role of Interactive Flat Panels (IFPs) as transformative digital learning media in shaping Indonesia’s educational reform under the Prabowo–Gibran administration (2024–2029). The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, synthesizing scholarly literature and education policy analyses to conceptualize how IFP integration supports national digital education goals. Globally, IFPs have been proven to enhance student engagement, learning outcomes, and teacher performance through interactive, multimedia-based instruction. Within the Indonesian context, their adoption aligns with the Merdeka Belajar and Smart Schools Indonesia initiatives, which emphasize technological equity, digital sovereignty, and 21st-century learning competencies. The findings indicate that IFPs can foster interactive and collaborative learning environments, strengthen teachers’ digital competencies, and facilitate Education 5.0 implementation nationwide. However, several barriers persist, including infrastructure inequality, limited teacher readiness, and financial constraints in public schools. Addressing these challenges requires multi-sectoral collaboration, capacity-building programs, and localized production strategies to ensure sustainability and affordability. The study concludes that IFPs are not merely instructional technologies but strategic policy instruments driving Indonesia’s digital transformation in education. Their effective integration can bridge pedagogical and technological divides, positioning Indonesia as a leader in digital learning innovation across Southeast Asia.
RETHINKING SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY IN THE AGE OF ALGORITHMIC MEDIATION: A PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY Usman Jayadi
SATUKATA: Jurnal Sains, Teknik, dan Studi Kemasyarakatan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): December
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/satukata.v4i1.4601

Abstract

The concept of scientific objectivity has long been regarded as the epistemic cornerstone of modern science, grounded in neutrality, reproducibility, and observer-independence. However, the rapid integration of algorithmic systems, artificial intelligence, and data-driven infrastructures into scientific processes has fundamentally transformed how knowledge is produced, validated, and disseminated. This paper offers a philosophical inquiry into the evolving nature of scientific objectivity in the age of algorithmic mediation. It argues that objectivity is no longer solely a function of human rationality and methodological rigor but is increasingly co-constructed by computational systems that embed implicit biases, design assumptions, and socio-technical constraints. Drawing on contemporary philosophy of science, digital epistemology, and critical algorithm studies, this study critically examines how algorithmic mediation reshapes epistemic authority, transparency, and accountability in scientific practices. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the paper synthesizes theoretical perspectives to propose a reconceptualization of objectivity as a relational and situated construct rather than an absolute ideal. The findings suggest that algorithmic systems simultaneously enhance and undermine objectivity by increasing analytical capacity while obscuring interpretive processes. Consequently, this paper calls for a reflexive framework of “augmented objectivity,” where human judgment and algorithmic processes are critically integrated. Such a framework emphasizes transparency, ethical design, and epistemic responsibility, ensuring that scientific knowledge remains trustworthy in increasingly automated environments.