Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

The Role of Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) in Shaping Indonesia’s Digital Learning Policy: A Vision for Educational Reform in the Prabowo–Gibran Era Usman Jayadi
International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijedl.v3i6.354

Abstract

This study explores the role of Interactive Flat Panels (IFPs) as transformative digital learning media in shaping Indonesia’s educational reform under the Prabowo–Gibran administration (2024–2029). The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, synthesizing scholarly literature and education policy analyses to conceptualize how IFP integration supports national digital education goals. Globally, IFPs have been proven to enhance student engagement, learning outcomes, and teacher performance through interactive, multimedia-based instruction. Within the Indonesian context, their adoption aligns with the Merdeka Belajar and Smart Schools Indonesia initiatives, which emphasize technological equity, digital sovereignty, and 21st-century learning competencies. The findings indicate that IFPs can foster interactive and collaborative learning environments, strengthen teachers’ digital competencies, and facilitate Education 5.0 implementation nationwide. However, several barriers persist, including infrastructure inequality, limited teacher readiness, and financial constraints in public schools. Addressing these challenges requires multi-sectoral collaboration, capacity-building programs, and localized production strategies to ensure sustainability and affordability. The study concludes that IFPs are not merely instructional technologies but strategic policy instruments driving Indonesia’s digital transformation in education. Their effective integration can bridge pedagogical and technological divides, positioning Indonesia as a leader in digital learning innovation across Southeast Asia.
RETHINKING SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY IN THE AGE OF ALGORITHMIC MEDIATION: A PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY Usman Jayadi
SATUKATA: Jurnal Sains, Teknik, dan Studi Kemasyarakatan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): December
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/satukata.v4i1.4601

Abstract

The concept of scientific objectivity has long been regarded as the epistemic cornerstone of modern science, grounded in neutrality, reproducibility, and observer-independence. However, the rapid integration of algorithmic systems, artificial intelligence, and data-driven infrastructures into scientific processes has fundamentally transformed how knowledge is produced, validated, and disseminated. This paper offers a philosophical inquiry into the evolving nature of scientific objectivity in the age of algorithmic mediation. It argues that objectivity is no longer solely a function of human rationality and methodological rigor but is increasingly co-constructed by computational systems that embed implicit biases, design assumptions, and socio-technical constraints. Drawing on contemporary philosophy of science, digital epistemology, and critical algorithm studies, this study critically examines how algorithmic mediation reshapes epistemic authority, transparency, and accountability in scientific practices. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the paper synthesizes theoretical perspectives to propose a reconceptualization of objectivity as a relational and situated construct rather than an absolute ideal. The findings suggest that algorithmic systems simultaneously enhance and undermine objectivity by increasing analytical capacity while obscuring interpretive processes. Consequently, this paper calls for a reflexive framework of “augmented objectivity,” where human judgment and algorithmic processes are critically integrated. Such a framework emphasizes transparency, ethical design, and epistemic responsibility, ensuring that scientific knowledge remains trustworthy in increasingly automated environments.
Adaptive School Management in Facing Technological Disruption in Elementary Schools in Mataram Usman Jayadi
Journal of Economics, Management, Development, and Education Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Economics, Management, Development, and Education (JEMDE) edisi June
Publisher : Journal of Economics, Management, Development, and Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20357787

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Adaptive School Management in Facing Technological Disruption in Elementary Schools in Mataram. The focus of this study is to examine the implementation of adaptive school management, the principal's strategy in managing digital transformation, supporting and inhibiting factors, and their implications for improving the quality of education. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, then analyzed using an interactive model that includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results show that the implementation of adaptive school management in elementary schools in Mataram City is carried out through the transformation of the principal's adaptive leadership, digitalization of school administration, strengthening an innovative organizational culture, improving teachers' digital competence, and collaboration with educational stakeholders. The principal's strategy in managing change is carried out through digital vision-based leadership, data-driven decision-making, and strengthening human resource capacity. The main supporting factors include education policy, infrastructure support, and teacher competence, while inhibiting factors include the digital literacy gap and resistance to change. The implications of this study indicate that adaptive school management can improve the effectiveness of governance, the quality of learning, and the quality of education sustainably in the era of technological disruption. This study concludes that adaptive school management is an important strategic approach in increasing the adaptability of elementary schools to technological change.
A Conceptual Review of Consumer Behavior in AI-Personalized Digital Environments Usman Jayadi
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijema.v3i6.366

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into digital platforms has fundamentally transformed consumer behavior through personalized interactions and algorithmic decision support. This study provides a conceptual review of consumer behavior in AI-personalized digital environments, aiming to reconceptualize traditional theories that are increasingly inadequate in explaining contemporary market dynamics. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from marketing, behavioral economics, and information systems, this study identifies critical shifts in how consumer decisions are formed, influenced, and constrained by algorithmic systems. The findings highlight three major theoretical developments. First, consumer decision-making is no longer solely bounded by cognitive limitations but is increasingly shaped by algorithmic bounded rationality, where technological architectures define available choices. Second, AI personalization contributes to preference closure, reinforcing existing behaviors while limiting exploratory consumption. Third, consumer autonomy is reframed as constructed autonomy, where perceived freedom of choice exists within algorithmically curated environments. Additionally, the study identifies emerging phenomena such as the transparency paradox, algorithmic trust, and privacy resignation. Based on these insights, this study proposes an integrated conceptual framework that emphasizes the dynamic interaction between consumer, algorithmic, and structural domains. The study contributes to the literature by offering a novel theoretical perspective on consumer behavior in the digital age and by challenging conventional assumptions of rationality and autonomy. Managerially, the findings underscore the importance of balancing personalization with transparency, trust, and ethical considerations. Future research is encouraged to empirically validate the proposed framework across different digital contexts.