Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA LAW REFORM Pandecta Yustisia Arena Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law International Journal of Supply Chain Management Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Abimanyu: Journal of Community Engagement Yuridika Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Disable: Law Review
Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Universitas Airlangga
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

 1 
UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI RAKYAT DALAM SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA Hari Sugiharto; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (8953.654 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.2

Abstract

AbstractThis article try to analyze the concept of administrative effort and it implementation at the court. Enacted of Act Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration leads the change of administrative court system in Indonesia. One of these change related to administrative effort. Legal issues in this article research is: first, do administrative effort must be taken before sues to administrative court; and second, whether original administrative decision or edministrative effort decision that used as an dispute object when apply a administrative lawsuit to administrative court. In accordance with the legal issues above, this article research is normative research to seek solutions to legal issues which are emerged. The results which have to be achieved are to provide the prescription of essential truth. There are several problems approach used in this study, such as statute approach and conceptual approach. Expected of this research can be found a norm that can be provides legal protection for the people especially in administrative dispute.  In Addition, this research trying to analize of legal protection principle over government action on public law and law enforcement of legal public act by government that could be pursued if there is any detrimental to society. Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa konsep mengenai upaya administratif dan penerapannya di pengadilan. Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan membawa perubahan dalam sistem peradilan tata usaha negara di Indonesia. Salah satu perubahan tersebut berkaitan dengan upaya administratif. Isu hukum dalam penelitian artikel ini pertama apakah upaya administratif harus ditempuh terlebih dahulu sebelum mengajukan gugatan sengketa tata usaha negara ke PTUN; dan kedua apakah keputusan tata usaha negara awal atau keputusan upaya administratif yang dijadikan obyek sengketa apabila mengajukan gugatan di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sesuai dengan isu hukum di atas, maka penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif untuk mencari pemecahan atas isu hukum yang timbul. Hasil yang hendak dicapai adalah memberikan preskripsi tentang kebenaran yang hakiki. Diharapkan dari penelitian ini didapatkan formulasi norma yang dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat khususnya dalam hal sengketa tata usaha Negara dan menganalisis tentang hakikat dari  perbuatan hukum publik oleh pemerintah dan penegakan hukum terhadap perbuatan pemerintah dalam hukum publik yang merugikan masyarakat.
THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIQH SIYASAH WITH THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA Prawitra Thalib; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Arena Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01202.1

Abstract

Abstrak Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik saat ini menjadi salah satu dasar penilaian bagi hakim di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara untuk menguji suatu tindak pemerintah tersebut mengandung unsur kerugian bagi masyarakat atau tidak. Adanya UU 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memperluas kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha negara dimana obyek gugatan dalam PTUN tidak hanya KTUN (beschikking) akan tetapi juga tindakan faktual dari pejabat atau badan tata usaha negara. Dengan adanya perubahan UU No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yaitu UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 mempertegas keberadaan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik sebagai alasan menggugat di PTUN. Tidak bisa dipungkiri saat ini konsep hukum Islam banyak dipakai dan diterapkan dalam tindakan-tindakan hukum, baik dalam ranah hukum bisnis atau privat maupun hukum publik. Oleh karena itu maka konsep pemerintahan yang baik menurut Islam perlu dikaji secara mendalam, sering disebut dengan konsep fiqh siyasah. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk meneliti perbandingan antara konsep Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik di satu sisi dengan konsep fiqh siyasah di sisi yang lain. Abstract The General Principles of Good Government are currently one of the assessment bases for the judges in the Administrative Court to examine whether or not actions of the government contains the elements of harm for the community. The existence of Law No.30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded the competence of The Administrative Court (PTUN) in which the object of lawsuit in the Administrative Court is not only the Decisions of Administrative (beschikking) but also factual action from official or administrative institutions. With the amendment of Law No.5 of 1986 on the Administrative Court namely Law No. 9 of 2004 and Law No.51 of 2009 affirms the existence of The General Principles of Good Government as one of reasons to sue in the Administrative Court. It is inevitable today that the concept of Islamic law is widely used and applied in legal actions, whether in the realm of business law, private law or public law. Therefore, the concept of good government according to Islam needs to be studied further, often referred to as the concept of fiqh siyasah. This study is aimed to examine the comparison between the concept of The General Principles of Good Government with the concept of fiqh siyasah.
The KPK'S Investigation Termination Warrant (SP3) Authority: Endeavours To Prevent Abuse Of Power Mohammad Syaiful Aris; Nahdyan, Auly; Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian
Arena Hukum Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2024.01701.9

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is a state entity created under Law No. 30 of 2002 in Indonesia to support the prosecutor’s office and the police in combating corruption. Law No. 30 of 2002 has been subject to multiple judicial reviews by the Constitutional Court (MK). In 2019, a proposal was submitted to amend Law No. 30 of 2002. The modification of the Law has both advantages and disadvantages, with some viewing it as weakening the KPK by categorising it inside the executive branch, thereby impacting the agency’s independence. One of the main focuses of this Article is the authorisation of the KPK to issue a Warrant to Terminate Investigation (SP3). SP3 results from the legal principle of defending human rights and serves as a tool for checks and balances, but it can also be prone to misuse. The research focuses on two main issues: changes in the KPK’s authority and the KPK Institution’s deconstruction. Secondly, the consequences of the KPK issuing SP3 and the risk of authority misuse in combating corruption. This study involves legal research utilising both statutory and conceptual approaches. This paper intends to evaluate the various ways in which power abuse might occur within a corruption eradication system, specifically focusing on delegating authority to the KPK in issuing SP3 from a constitutional standpoint. The conclusions of this study provide a way to prevent the abuse of SP3 through reporting procedures and case titles at the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas). In addition, the method should include authorising the KPK to revoke SP3.
Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Nugraha, Xavier; Hartono, Julienna; Kosuma, Indah Permatasari
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.5

Abstract

This doctrinal research aims to analyze the development of legal consequences and legal protection related to the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials. Until the enactment of the Job Creation Act, there were 3 (three) different legal norms regarding the legal consequences of the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials, namely fictitious rejection, in the State Administrative Court Law, fictitious approval followed up with applications, in the Government Administration Act, and fictitious approval without being followed up with an application, in the Job Creation Act. Based on the principle that the new law overrides the old law, the applicable legal consequences are as regulated in the Job Creation Act. Then, legal protection related to the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials are the imposition of administrative sanctions, submitting applications for the determination of fictitious approval of state administrative decisions to the Administrative Court, filing claims based on government actions disputes, or submitting reports to the Ombudsman.
Co-Authors Aditya, Kukuh Leksono Ave Maria Frisa K Deddy Sutrisno Faizal Kurniawan Farid Ibrahim Fauzurrahman, Iqbal Felicia, Stefania Arshanty Fikri, Muhammad Azharuddin Ghansam Anand Ghansam Anand, Ghansam Hari Sugiharto Harmanto, Toni Hartono, Julienna hezron sabar rotua tinambunan Indrawati Indrawati Iqbal Fauzurrahman Kosuma, Indah Permatasari Kukuh Leksono S. Aditya M. Syaiful Aris Mohammad Syaiful Aris Nahdyan, Auly Nainggolan, Samuel Dharma Putra Nathanael Grady Nugraha, Xavier Prawitra Thalib Ramadhanti, Syifa Risdiana Izzaty Sri Hajati Sri Winarsi Stefania Arshanty Felicia Suparto Wijoyo Syifa Ramadhanti Tinambunan, Hezron Sabar Rotua Urip Santoso Wilda Prihatiningtyas