Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.756
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal English Education Journal ELITE Journal: Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education Fitrah: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Elementeris : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Islam Andragogi : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam Counselia: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Pendidikan Islam MUALLIMUN : JURNAL KAJIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEGURUAN Al-Bidayah : jurnal pendidikan dasar Islam ATTARBIYAH: Journal of Islamic Culture and Education
Herman Khunaivi
STAI Al-Anwar Sarang, Rembang
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : English Education Journal

 1 
TEACHER’S AND STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN TEACHING SPEAKING Khunaivi, Herman; Hartono, Rudi
English Education Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : English Education Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to find out the types of the spoken errors commonly made by the students in speaking, knowing the reasons do the students make same errors, describing how English teachers use corrective feedback to refine students’ errors, exploring the types of corrective feedback do the students mostly like, explaining the teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards corrective feedback.The types of this study was descriptive qualitative study. The findings indicated that errors mostly made by the students were pronunciation error, grammatical error and lexical error, why did they make same errors because the students got fossilization, corrcetive feedbacks were used to refine students speaking were explicit correction, repetition and reformulation, corrective feedbacks that the students mostly like were explicit correction, repetition and pronunciation, the teachers perceptions towards corrective feedback were corrective feedback was to know the lacks of the students speaking, the teachers could give the students feedbacks in order not to be fossilized. by giving feedback appropraitely it was believed the students would not be fossilized. The students’ perceptionson corrective feedback were they had very good responses about corrective feedback that were given by the teachers in the classroom.
Co-Authors Ahmad Shofiyuddin Ichsan Ahmad Sunoko Aida Shofrotus Shofi Al Basyari, M. Mahbub ESTI KURNIASIH Intan Aulia Rakhmawati Maulana, Ardian Nunung Endha Nurjannah Nunung Suryati Rakhmawati, Intan Aulia Rifqotul Aulia Rizki Agustin Rokhman, Roli Abdul Roviqoh, Qoriatul Rudi Hartono Sarah Ainun Nisak Subriatin, Eka Suroiya Wahidah, Zahrotus Syarifatul Fitri Hidayah Trimansyah, Trimansyah