Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

TINDAK PIDANA PEREDARAN MIE DENGAN CAMPURAN FORMALIN (Suatu Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Bireuen) Tari Nabila Yolanda; Ida Keumala Jeumpa
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana Vol 7, No 2: Mei 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstrak- Penulisan jurnal ini adalah untuk menjelaskan faktor penyebab pelaku melakukan tindak pidana perdagangan mie dengan campuran formalin, penerapan sanksi pidana kepada pelaku tindak pidana peredaran mie dengan campuran formalin dan kendala yang muncul dan solusi dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana peredaran mie dengan campuran formalin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor penyebab yang dilakukan oleh pelaku tindak pidana perdagangan mie dengan campuran formalin didasarkan kurang kesadaran pelaku usaha mie, penurunan ekonomi yang dialami oleh pelaku dan faktor kuranya pengawasan dari aparat penegak hukum. Penerapan sanksi pidana kepada pelaku tindak pidana perdagangan makanan dengan campuran formalin didasarkan pada hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan pelaku di dipersidangan yaitu pelaku bersifat kooperatif di dalam persidangan dan pelaku belum pernah melakukan tindak pidana sebelumnya. Kendala dan solusi dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana perdagangan makanan campuran formalin adalah kurangnya kesadaran hukum sehingga dibutuhkan pengawasan khusus, luas wilayah Aceh yang tidak sebanding dengan SDM BPOM Aceh sehingga dibutuhkan kerjasama dengan penyidik Polri. Disarankan kepada Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Bireuen untuk tidak menjatuhkan sanksi pidana ringan kepada pelaku dan berpedoman pada Undang-Undang Pangan guna memenuhi keadilan dan kepastian hukum serta saran kepada pihak penyidik dan PPNS BPOM dan penyidik untuk diberikan pendidikan lanjutan guna menambah kualitas PPNS BPOM dalam mengatasi tindak pidana perdagangan mie dengan campuran formalin. Kata Kunci : Tindak Pidana, Peredaran, Formalin.

Proof of State Financial Losses in State-Owned Banking Enterprises Related to Corruption Crimes Rahmat Fajri; Ida Keumala Jeumpa; Yusri Yusri
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i4.779

Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes (Tipikor Law) requires the existence of state financial losses as an important element in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3. Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016, proof of state losses must be actual losses, rather than potential losses. However, in practice, there is a discrepancy between legal norms and the reality of law enforcement, especially in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) engaged in banking. There is disharmony between the Anti-Corruption Law, the State Finance Law, and the SOE Law, particularly regarding the financial status of SOEs as separate state assets. This study uses a normative legal method with a statute approach. The results show that proving state financial losses in banking SOEs related to corruption requires an examination by an authorised institution to declare state financial losses. Based on Article 10 paragraph (1) of Law No. 15 of 2006 concerning the Audit Board, it is explained that the Audit Board has the authority to determine the existence or absence of state losses. The audit process carried out by the Audit Board on state-owned banking enterprises suspected of causing state financial losses must be an investigative audit process, not a state loss calculation audit that is usually carried out on government institutions.

Legal Analysis of The Element of Economic Loss to The State in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of The Corruption Crimes Act Munawwar Hamidi; Ida Keumala Jeumpa; Sri Walny Rahayu
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v3i1.826

The ambiguity of the concept of state economic loss in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Crime Law (Tipikor Law) has yet to be defined normatively or by an official institution with the authority to do so. This uncertainty has given rise to legal problems in law enforcement, especially after Constitutional Court Decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016, which changed the qualification of corruption offenses to material offenses, so that the proof of economic loss to the state must be actual loss. However, in practice, as in the Surya Darmadi corruption case, law enforcement officials still face difficulties in determining the measure and method of proving economic loss to the state in a lawful manner. The issues in this study are the basis for the judge's consideration of the element of economic loss to the state in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 62/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst and the obstacles and constraints in proving the element of economic loss to the state in criminal acts of corruption.This study uses a normative legal method with a statute approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the first-level panel of judges assessed that environmental damage and the loss of potential state revenue due to the illegal conversion of forest areas were part of the actual economic loss to the state, while the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of limiting this element to actual loss in accordance with Constitutional Court Decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. The obstacles and constraints in proving the element of state economic loss in corruption crimes stem from internal and external factors that are interrelated and affect the effectiveness of law enforcement.

The Application of Digital Forensics in the Authentication and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Cybercrime Cases within the Jurisdiction of the Banda Aceh District Court Puan Diva Humaira; Ida Keumala Jeumpa; Sanusi Sanusi
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July: International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v3i3.972

The legal status of electronic evidence is governed by Article 5, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the ITE Law. Electronic information and documents do not qualify as evidence by default; they must satisfy the formal and substantive criteria established by the ITE Law. Authentication and admissibility represent two interrelated phases in the evidentiary chain. Judicial practice exhibits variability in the evaluation of electronic evidence; some judges accept it without digital forensic investigation, whereas others require supplementary verification to ascertain its validity and integrity. This indicates that the problem resides in the fulfilment and evaluation of the criteria for authenticity and admissibility of evidence. This research aims to elucidate the role of digital forensics in the criminal justice system concerning the authenticity and admission criteria for electronic evidence in cybercrime cases at the Banda Aceh District Court. The employed research method is empirical legal research, which investigates societal, institutional, or state events and phenomena by direct observation. This research utilises both primary and secondary data sources. This research is conducted under the jurisdiction of the Banda Aceh District Court. This study involved the collecting, evaluation, and interpretation of data to elucidate the application of digital forensics in substantiating cybercrime. The research findings demonstrate that the implementation of digital forensics to fulfil the criteria of authentication and admissibility of electronic evidence in cybercrime cases at the Banda Aceh District Court has been executed during the investigation, prosecution, and trial phases within the criminal justice system. In terms of authentication, digital forensics is employed to verify the validity, integrity, and pertinence of electronic evidence related to the criminal incident under investigation. Digital forensics enhances the admissibility of electronic evidence through forensic examination reports and expert testimony that elucidate the technical validity and methodology of evidence acquisition.

Criminal Law Enforcement Against Business Actors Involved in the Distribution of Cosmetic Products Without Distribution Permits: A Research Study within the Jurisdiction of the Bireuen District Court Rachmi Martiya; Ida Keumala Jeumpa; Sulaiman Sulaiman
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v3i2.981

Article 435 of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health prohibits any person from producing or distributing pharmaceutical preparations, including cosmetics, that do not meet safety, efficacy, quality, and licensing standards. However, the circulation of cosmetics without distribution permits is still frequently found, including in Bireuen Regency. This condition indicates that law enforcement against illegal cosmetic business actors has not been optimally implemented. This study aims to analyze criminal law enforcement against business actors involved in the distribution of cosmetics without distribution permits within the jurisdiction of the Bireuen District Court, examine the obstacles encountered, and identify the criminological factors underlying the commission of such offenses. The research method employed is empirical juridical research using statutory, case, and criminological approaches through library research and field research conducted by interviews with the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM), police, prosecutors, and business actors. The results of the study show that law enforcement against the distribution of cosmetics without distribution permits has not been effective due to weak supervision of digital trade, limited monitoring facilities, low public legal awareness, and relatively light criminal sanctions that fail to create a deterrent effect. From a criminological perspective, these offenses are influenced by economic factors, high public demand for instant cosmetic products, the development of social media and e-commerce, as well as weak supervision and social control. It is recommended that digital trade supervision be strengthened, inter-agency coordination among law enforcement institutions be improved, and stricter sanctions be imposed on offenders, particularly recidivists, in order to enhance public health protection and the effectiveness of law enforcement.

Juridical Analysis of the Use of Undercover Buy by Police Investigators in Narcotics Crimes Ashabul Jannah; Ida Keumala Jeumpa; Teuku Saiful
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v3i2.985

The use of the undercover buy technique in the investigation of narcotics crimes has obtained a legal basis in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. However, the absence of detailed implementation arrangements regarding procedures, limits of authority, and the prohibition of entrapment has caused legal uncertainty and differences in interpretation among law enforcement officials. As a result, there is a disparity in court decisions, as seen in the Calang District Court Decision Number 18/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Cag which assesses the act of undercover buying as a form of investigator engineering even though elements of criminal acts have been proven. This study aims to explain and analyze the legal basis for the use of undercover buy investigation techniques by Indonesian Police Investigators in the Indonesian legal system as well as explain and examine the legal consequences arising from the application of undercover buy investigation techniques in narcotics crimes. This research is a normative juridical research with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data were analyzed qualitatively through the study of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using legal interpretation techniques. The results of the study show that the Indonesian National Police Investigators are authorized to use the undercover buy technique based on the Narcotics Law and internal police policies. This authority is an attribution authority supported by police discretion, but it has not been supported by detailed implementation arrangements so that it has the potential to cause legal uncertainty. In addition, the use of undercover buy affects the validity of evidence in narcotics cases. If carried out according to procedures, the results can be used as valid evidence, while implementation that is not in accordance with procedures has the potential to cause procedural defects, invalidity of evidence, and human rights violations in the form of case engineering or entrapment. The suggestion of this study is the need for stricter regulation of undercover buying techniques through clear operational standards, limits of authority, and prevention of entrapment, accompanied by increased professionalism of investigators and internal supervision, and each implementation must be based on written orders to ensure legal certainty and the validity of evidence.

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 6 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 6 Documents
Search