Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dialogia Iuridica JURNAL RECHTENS Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Hang Tuah Law Journal Probono and Community Service Journal Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Civic Education Law and Humaniora : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Terintegrasi
Mokhamad Gisa Vitrana
Department Of International Law, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Dialogia Iuridica

 1 
Kehancuran Benda Cagar Budaya Saat Konflik Bersenjata: Eksistensi Blue Shield Emblem Mokhamad Gisa Vitrana; Anna Anindita Nur Pustika
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): Dialogia Iuridica Journal Vol. 15 No. 1 Year 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v15i1.6586

Abstract

The intentional destruction of cultural heritage in armed conflict that is not used for military purposes causes the greatest losses of mankind. Lots of cultural properties have great value as the cultural heritage of mankind. Creating the distinctive emblem through the 1954 Hague Convention and its two Protocols d become a crucial way in terms of the protection of cultural properties. Based on these instruments, three categories of distinctive emblem gave for cultural properties over general, special and enhanced protection. It could impact cultural property under unnecessary damage when armed conflict occurred. Therefore, this research d a crucial basic issue on how form, function, and assignation of the distinctive emblem should be, based on the provisions of the 1954 Hague Convention and its two Protocols, as well as related International Humanitarian Law. As the result of this research, it can be said that the existence of a distinctive emblem is remained unclear in terms of its size form and assignation on cultural property. This research ed that the use of distinctive emblem shall be regulated by decisive provisions through a Convention or such a guideline of implementation so that distinctive emblem can be seen by the dispute parties to avoid unnecessary damage to cultural property.
Co-Authors Afandi Sitamala Afriman Oktavianus Ahmad Rayhan Anna Anindita Nur Pustika Anom, Surya Anom, Surya Asasiyah, Aulia Randits Maulida Danial Danial Danial Danial Furqon, Eki Hambali, Hambali Hanifah, Amiratul Aulia Hany, Elbirra Malida Hera Susanti Hilton Tarnama Putra M Islamiah, Kiki Rizki Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega Johan, Eva Kania, Sekar Puteri Khotimah Estiyovionita Muslih, Muhamad Oktavianus, Afriman Oktrian, Pryanka Ceza Rosita, Ita Setiawati, Anisa Deny Surya Anom Susanti, Hera Syakhila Bella Maulidya Tiara Destia Herman Yeliana Septiani Noor