Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Media Iuris JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Semarang Law Review Journal of English Literature and Linguistic Studies (JELLS)
Galuh Puspaningrum, Galuh
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengembanan Hukum Praktis dan Teoritis Penegakan Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Puspaningrum, Galuh; Widayanti, Ikarini Dani; Handono, Mardi
DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2023): Diversi Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KADIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/diversi.v9i1.3825

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji penegakan hukum persaingan usaha dari aspek formil dan materiil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengembanan hukum praktis dan teoritis pada penegakan hukum persaingan usaha ditinjau dari kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekaburan norma yaitu pada Pasal 44 Ayat (4) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha tidak Sehat, yang terkait dengan tindakan penyidikan oleh penyidik manakala pelaku usaha tidak melaksanakan putusan. Pengaturan yang bersifat multitafsir inilah yang berdampak pada ketidakpastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha dan penegakan hukum yang kurang maksimal. Pada hakikatnya penegakan hukum persaingan usaha memiliki karakteristik khusus dan berbeda dengan proses peradilan mengingat garda penegakan hukum dikawal oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha sebagai quasi judicial, sehingga melalui pengembenan hukum pada penegakan hukum persaingan usaha baik secara praktis dan teoritis, perlu adanya perbaikan terhadap proses dan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa persaingan usaha sepanjang tidak bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip persaingan usaha yang sehat.
GUGATAN TIDAK DAPAT DITERIMA DENGAN ALASAN OBSCUUR LIBEL PADA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 67/PDT.G/2021/PN JMR) Ali, Moh.; Krisdianti, Kinasih Amara; Puspaningrum, Galuh
Semarang Law Review (SLR) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/slr.v5i2.10732

Abstract

The claim formulation made by the plaintiff is used as a reference for a case or dispute in a court. A lawsuit that does not comply with the requirements of the procedural law will be declared that the lawsuit cannot be accepted or in other terms niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) in the final decision by the judge. There are various reasons for the dropping of the niet ontvankelijke verklaard, one of which is because the lawsuit that was made was not perfect, in the sense that the lawsuit was vague (obscuur libel). Obscuur libel means a claim whose contents are unclear so that it is said to be neither clear nor dark in the formulation of the claim. This research uses a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research contains an analysis of a decision which states that the lawsuit contains elements of obcur libel so it is declared unacceptable. Judges need to dig deeper into jurisprudence to analyze a lawsuit so that it produces the right decision.AbstrakFormulasi gugatan yang dibuat oleh penggugat digunakan sebagai acuan dari suatu perkara atau sengketa disebuah pengadilan. Gugatan yang tidak sesuai syarat dalam hukum acara akan dinyatakan bahwa gugatan tersebut tidak dapat diterima atau istilah lainnya niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) pada putusan akhir oleh hakim. Alasan dari penjatuhan niet ontvankelijke verklaard sendiri terdapat berbagai penyebab salah satunya dikarenakan gugatan yang dibuat tidak sempurna, dalam artian gugatan tersebut kabur (obscuur libel). Obscuur libel memiliki arti gugatan yang isinya tidak jelas sehingga dikatakan tidak terang atau gelap dalam formulasi gugatannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan penekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini berisi analisis suatu putusan yang menyatakan bahwa gugatan mengandung unsur obcuur libel sehingga dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Hakim perlu menggali lebih dalam mengenai suatu yurisprudensi untuk menggali dapat menganalisis suatu gugatan sehingga menghasilkan putusan yang tepat.
Kebijakan Formulasi dan Prospektif Penegakan Hukum Tindakan Kealpaan Tenaga Medis/Tenaga Kesehatan (Dinamika Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Malpraktik Medis) Suyudi, Godeliva Ayudyana; Wildana, Dina Tsalist; Prihatmini, Sapti; Puspaningrum, Galuh
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 7, Nomor 2, Tahun 2025
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i2.49-70

Abstract

Article 440 of the Health Act formulates criminal penalties for the negligence of medical persons/health workers in health services that result in serious injury or death. This study aimed to examine the urgency of the special provision formulation policy and its prospective law enforcement. This framework creates the general provisions of the Criminal Code applied in dealing with negligent acts of medical personnel/health workers resulting in serious injury or death of patients, which should be overridden based on “lex specialis derogat legi generali” principles. Health act in Article 440 as a material offence has special characteristics, whose assessment is based on professional standards and is oriented towards providing balanced legal protection for patients, health workers, and legal certainty for law enforcement officials. According to proving the elements of negligence and causal relationship in the context of therapeutic transactions, it is based on evidence according to KUHAP. Expert testimony occupies an important position in determining professional standards, including medical records and/or visum et repertum. As a material offense, Health Law Article 440 requires caution to achieve the goals of material truth and justice. It can be concluded that the law enforcement of negligence of medical/health workers must be based on the specificity of the unlawful nature of the act, which is different from general criminal offenses, with the benchmark of professional standards resting on the causal relationship between negligence and consequences through evidence, especially expert testimony.
A Legal Perspective Toward Unlawful Acts in Tender Collusion in Indonesia Puspaningrum, Galuh; Yasa, I Wayan; Putri, Linda Cristina
Media Iuris Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v8i3.68535

Abstract

The research aims to compare and examine a case of tender conspiracy seeking similarities with or seen from the perspective of civil unlawful acts. Every business actor is prohibited from carrying out an activity that results in losses for other business actors and conducting fraudulent competition. The legal issues addressed in this research include reviewing one of the prohibited activities, namely the conspiracy of tenders stipulated in Article 22 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition (Anti-Monopoly Law), from the elements of unlawful acts based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code (Civil Code). The legal issues in this study are, first, does the practice of bid rigging contain elements of unlawful acts, and what is the legal perspective on it, and second, what are the legal consequences for business actors proven to have engaged in bid rigging. This paper uses normative legal research, supported by primary and secondary legal materials and legal approaches are relevant to the legal issues under study, such as the approach to legislation, conceptual approach and comparative approach. The findings and discussion showed that bid rigging actions can be classified as unlawful acts, based on the following elements. First, the act of collusion with the intention to manipulate and ensure who will win the tender. Second, the act qualifies as unlawful, consisting of the elements of collusion, manipulation, and ensuring a specific business actor wins the tender, along with the element of unfair competition. Third, the element of fault is fulfilled on the part of the reported parties, in this case, the tender participants. Fourth, the practice negatively affects other business actors, both materially and immaterially, particularly in their opportunity to win the tender. Fifth, there is a proven causal relationship and impact of the bid rigging committed by the reported parties, resulting in harm to other business actors. In conclusion, bid rigging practices can be classified as unlawful acts as long as the elements of such acts are fulfilled.
Kepastian Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/PUU-XX/2022 A mir Rizki, Mohammad Fa iq; Rato, Dominikus; Puspaningrum, Galuh
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 3 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v7i3.4145

Abstract

Fenomena perkawinan beda agama sebagai realitas sosiologis yang tidak terbendung dalam masyarakat Indonesia yang heterogen menempati ruang abu-abu dalam domain yuridis disebabkan disatu sisi ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan secara implisit diinterpretasikan sebagai ketentuan yang memberikan halangan dilakukan perkawinan beda agama dan dilain sisi ketentuan Pasal 35 huruf (a) Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan memberikan kesempatan dilakukan pencatatan perkawinan beda agama. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana status hukum perkawinan beda agama pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/PUU-XX/2022. Tujuan Penelitian untuk mengetahui status hukum perkawinan beda agama pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/PUU-XX/2022. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggubakan 3 (tiga) pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan undang-undang, kasus, dan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah status perkawinan beda agama berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/PUU-XX/2022 ditentukan oleh hukum agama melalui institusi keagamaan untuk melakukan interpretasi dan menentukan perkawinan tersebut absah. Formalitas pencatatan perkawinan beda agama sebagai kepentingan dan tanggung jawab negara menurut ketentuan Pasal 35 huruf (a) Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan dilakukan sepanjang hasil interpretasi institusi keagamaan menentukan keabsahan perkawinan tersebut.
THE DEPICTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTER'S CHANGE AS A VICTIM OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN THE FILM "SPEAK" Puspaningrum, Galuh; Halim, Abdul
Journal of English Literature and Linguistic Studies Vol 4, No 1 (2025): Journal of English Literature and Linguistic Studies (JELLS) - November 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/jells.v4i1.59683

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the main character's change as a victim of sexual violence in the film "Speak" using the semiotics of signs. The focus of this research is to find out and examine the semiotics sign and the meaning in the film “Speak” (2004). This research follows the theory of semiotics sign by Roland Barthes (1968 & 1972). Semiotics is the study of signs and their relationship with other signs and the meaning of signs. This research uses qualitative methods and watching and taking screenshots in the form of pictures or images that will contain paint, action, words, gestures, expressions, and appearances that are part of scenarios or scenes in the film "Speak" as the technique for collecting data. In data analysis, the research took the theory by Miles, Huberman, & Saldana (2014). Semiotic signs obtained in the film "Speak" include positive and negative changes with signs of distrust, anger, helplessness, fear, desperation, self-blame, embarrassment, trust, courage, and self-esteem and also the meaning of these signs concerning the main character's change as a victim of sexual violence. It can be concluded that the signs obtained are interrelated with each other. The changes in the main character are related to the incident, the perpetrator, the environment, and the stigma from outside and within, shown through the thoughts, feelings, and behavior of the victim as a result of a bad experience.   
Gugatan Pembatalan Pemegang Hak Desain Industri Kaca Helm (Studi Putusan Nomor 147 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024) Hapsari, Erdita; Dani Widiyanti, Ikarini; Puspaningrum, Galuh
Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, Oktober 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hak Desain Industri diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri yang memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap desain yang baru dan orisinal. Dalam praktiknya, masih terjadi pelanggaran dan mengarah pada sengketa hukum serta pembatalan hak desain industri. Sengketa desain industri antar pelaku usaha terjadi seperti pada Putusan Nomor 31/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst yang merupakan sengketa desain industri kaca helm milik Verawati sebagai Penggugat dan Sumarno sebagai Tergugat. Lalu, Penggugat mengajukan banding dan akhirnya ditinjau kembali oleh Mahkamah Agung dan keluar-lah Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 147 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembatalan desain industri mempunyai hak untuk dilindungi bagi pelaku usaha pemegang hak tersebut, serta alasan dan pertimbangan hukum dalam sengketa pembatalan desain industri, termasuk ganti rugi dan hukuman penjara hingga 4 tahun (Pasal 54 UU No. 31 Tahun 2000). Dalam Putusan Nomor 147 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024, desain dianggap baru jika tidak sama dengan pengungkapan sebelumnya. Penggugat gagal membuktikan keberadaan desain sebelumnya, sehingga pendaftaran desain Tergugat sah. Putusan ini menekankan pentingnya bukti kuat dan pemahaman hak-hak hukum.
Co-Authors A Halim A mir Rizki, Mohammad Fa iq Dani Widiyanti, Ikarini Dina Tsalist Wildana, Dina Tsalist Dominikus Rato Handono, Mardi Hapsari, Erdita I Wayan Yasa, I Wayan Krisdianti, Kinasih Amara Moh. Ali Prihatmini, Sapti Putri, Linda Cristina Suyudi, Godeliva Ayudyana Widayanti, Ikarini Dani