Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.431
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Hasanuddin Law Review Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Indonesian Journal of International Law VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Ahmad Syofyan
Dosen Bagian Hukum Internasional Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung
Humanities Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Hasanuddin Law Review

 1 
Implementation of Civil Rights against Vulnerable Groups in the Legal and Constitutional System in Indonesia Rudy Rudy; Rudi Natamiharja; Jalil Alejandro Magaldi Serna; Ahmad Syofyan
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 8 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v8i3.4229

Abstract

Constitutional Court is established as an effort to uphold the rule of law and provide maximum protection for democracy as well as human rights, particularly civil rights. The main purpose of the rule of law is to protect citizens' freedom from state power. Therefore, this study aims to examine the implementation of civil rights against vulnerable groups in the Indonesian legal and constitutional system. Data were analyzed using a normative juridical approach by examining theories, concepts, legal principles, and statutory regulations obtained from legal sources such as books, articles/writings, and other documents. The government issued various laws and regulations with multiple conventions such as the rights of the child and the elimination of all forms of discrimination but this effort has not been supported by a strong shared commitment. Based on these circumstances, it is necessary to develop an effective law enforcement mechanism to protect citizens' rights, particularly vulnerable groups.
Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN Syofyan, Ahmad; Azizah, Siti; Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah; Kusworo, Daffa Ladro
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912

Abstract

ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.
Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN Syofyan, Ahmad; Azizah, Siti; Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah; Kusworo, Daffa Ladro
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912

Abstract

ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.
Co-Authors Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al Anggun Nurfani Bayu Sujadmiko, Bayu DARYANTI DARYANTI Desy Churul Aini emi eliza emi eliza, emi Heryandi Heryandi Heryandi Heryandi Isroni Muhammad Miraj Mirza Jalil Alejandro Magaldi Serna Januarti, Rasti Putri Kusworo, Daffa Ladro Kyrieleison, Eunike Christine Melly Aida Muhtadi Muhtadi NAEK SIREGAR Natamiharja, Rudi Palindo, Ahmad Dempo Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah Rudy Rudy Siti Azizah Yusdiyanto Zulkarnain Ridlwan