Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tadulako Law Review Jurnal Selat Hasanuddin Law Review Cepalo Journal Social Science And Technology For Community Service Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Desy Churul Aini
Universitas Lampung
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

 1 
HARMONISASI UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 DENGAN KETENTUAN INTERNASIONAL TENTANG MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN 2015 (Asean Economic Community/AEC 2015) Aini, Desy Churul
FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 9, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One form of regional cooperation is followed by Indonesia with his participation as a member of ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) which was established on the basis of the Bangkok Declaration, on 8 August 1967. By the 21st century, ASEAN agreed to develop an integrated regional by forming a community of nations in Southeast Asia open, peaceful, stable and prosperous, mutual care, tied together in a dynamic partnership in 2020. Expectations are outlined in the ASEAN vision 2020 in Kuala Lumpur in 1997. To realize these expectations ratify ASEAN Bali Concord II at the 9th ASEAN Summit in Bali in 2003 which approved the establishment of an ASEAN Community (ASEAN Community) and the target is accelerated into 2015. The result shows there is disharmony between 1945 to the international provisions of the AEC 2015 in which the rules on economic issues and social welfare in 1945 are listed in Chapter XIV National Economy and social welfare, Article 33 (1), (2), (3) and (4), while based on the AEC 2015 blueprint contains four pillar framework or MEA. Disharmony both conditions contained in 4 (four) things into focus, namely the harmonization of aspects of the legal principle, an agreement on the authority, goal setting and alignment settings on the environment and surrounding communities.Keywords: Disharmony, the Constitution 1945, Asean Economic Community
Pengaturan Tentang Status Hukum “Illegal Immigrant” Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional, Hukum Nasional Dan Penanganannya Di Indonesia Aini, Desy Churul
Jurnal Selat Vol 2 No 2 (2015): "Kemaritiman & Perbatasan"
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (84.219 KB)

Abstract

Indonesia constitutes state transit to divide illegal immigrant , asylum and refuge e seeker.International protection on refugees is managed in Convention 1951 and Protocols 1967 about status of Refugee. Indonesia until now haven’t ratification Convention 1951 and Protocols 1967 about status of Refugee, so no special national law that manages about status of and in the presence asylum seeker and Refugee at Indonesian. Handle on illegal immigrant , asylum and refugee seeker performed by Immigration General directorate as institute of expatriate supervisor that given by authority by Indonesia Government to do collaboration and asks for UNHCR’S help (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) and IOM (International Organizations for Migrant). About problem emerging while authority state establishment sentences illegal immigrant this becomes overlap among drd that institute. Keywords: Jurisdictional State, illegal immigrant
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN ARMED CONFLICT ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Aini, Desy Churul; Banjarani, Desia Rakhma
Tadulako Law Review Vol 3, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Tadulako University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The environment is a victim of various armed conflicts that occur in some parts of the world. Such as Congo war in 1998 that create environmental damage like deployment of the HIV-AIDS virus, the extinction of national parks, wildlife poaching and the forest burning. In addition the Rwanda civil war in 1994 affected the loss of biodiversity, natural resources and population decline in rare animals such as the African Gorillas. While the former Yugoslavia war in 1991 that impact in environmental pollution of water, air and land that threaten human survival.The environment becomes a victim when the war was happend its caused the human, but on the other side, the environment can’t be separated from human life because somehow humans need the environment to. However, when the war was happend human can’t maintaining the environment even though there have been rules that regulate about the protection of the environment when the war takes place. Therefore, its necessary to analysed an environmental protection in armed conflict according to international humanitarian law.This research is discusses about how an environmental protection in armed conflict according to international humanitarian law, which aims to explain the regulations that apply to protect the environment at the armed conflict. This research uses normative law approach (literature research).The results of this study show that environmental protection in armed conflict is regulated in the conventions of international humanitarian law both from the Hague Law and the Geneva Law. In The Hague law the environmental protection is governed by the IV Hague Convention 1907of respecting the laws and customs of war and land Art 23 (g) and Art 55. In the Geneva Law an environmental protection is contained in the IV Geneva Convention 1949 Art 53 and Additional Protocol I in 1977 Art 35 (3), 54, 55, 56, 59, and Art 68. Basically both of Geneva and Hague Law against the use of weapons during the war that have an effected in environmental damage and the existence of precautions in the war on environmental protection life. Beside the Geneva and the Hague Law there are have other arrangements to protect the environment in the event of a war that is in ENMOD Convention Art 1 and 2.
HARMONISASI UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 DENGAN KETENTUAN INTERNASIONAL TENTANG MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN 2015 (Asean Economic Community/AEC 2015) Desy Churul Aini
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no3.606

Abstract

One form of regional cooperation is followed by Indonesia with his participation as a member of ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) which was established on the basis of the Bangkok Declaration, on 8 August 1967. By the 21st century, ASEAN agreed to develop an integrated regional by forming a community of nations in Southeast Asia open, peaceful, stable and prosperous, mutual care, tied together in a dynamic partnership in 2020. Expectations are outlined in the ASEAN vision 2020 in Kuala Lumpur in 1997. To realize these expectations ratify ASEAN Bali Concord II at the 9th ASEAN Summit in Bali in 2003 which approved the establishment of an ASEAN Community (ASEAN Community) and the target is accelerated into 2015. The result shows there is disharmony between 1945 to the international provisions of the AEC 2015 in which the rules on economic issues and social welfare in 1945 are listed in Chapter XIV National Economy and social welfare, Article 33 (1), (2), (3) and (4), while based on the AEC 2015 blueprint contains four pillar framework or MEA. Disharmony both conditions contained in 4 (four) things into focus, namely the harmonization of aspects of the legal principle, an agreement on the authority, goal setting and alignment settings on the environment and surrounding communities.Keywords: Disharmony, the Constitution 1945, Asean Economic Community
Does International Criminal Court have Jurisdiction over the Destruction of Cultural Property by the Islamic State of Irac and Syria? Bayu Sujadmiko; Desia Rakhma Banjarani; Rudi Natamiharja; Desy Churul Aini
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p01

Abstract

The cultural property becomes objects of destruction in armed conflicts, such as Syria and Iraq, which were carried out by ISIS squads (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria). For ISIS’s actions, the ICC should judge ISIS. However, new problems will arise regarding the jurisdiction of the ICC to judge ISIS. Based on the explanation of this background, the question will arise: How are humanitarian law regulations related to protecting cultural property during armed conflict? And what is the regulation of the ICC’s jurisdiction over the protection of cultural property in armed conflict by ISIS? The research in this article is normative legal research with the statue approach. According to humanitarian law, the research results show that the regulations relating to the protection of cultural property during armed conflict are contained in the 1954 Hague Convention, Additional Protocol I and Additional Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions of 1977. The destruction of cultural property carried out by ISIS is included in war crimes, one of the Rome Statute material jurisdictions. In this case, the Rome Statute applied by the ICC has juridical power to uphold justice and punish, including war crimes committed by ISIS. For the destruction of various cultural property in Iraq and Syria, ISIS can be judge by the ICC through a referral by the UN Security Council based on the provisions stipulated in the 1998 Rome Statute.
EDUKASI PENDAFTARAN MEREK KEPADA PERANGKAT DESA DAN PELAKU UMKM MENUJU PEMULIHAN EKONOMI PASCA COVID-19 DI DESA SAWOJAJAR KABUPATEN LAMPUNG UTARA Desy Churulaini
Journal of Social Sciences and Technology for Community Service (JSSTCS) Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Vol 2, No 2 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jsstcs.v2i2.1361

Abstract

Dimasa pandemi saat ini kita seakan dipaksa untuk memasuki suasana baru dalam lingkup digital. Semua dilakukan melalui sosial media , dan jejaring internet. Pandemi Covid-19 merubah pola perilaku dan kehidupan manusia hampir diseluruh negara, tak terkecuali Indonesia untuk dapat berkomunikasi secara virtual dan hampir seluruh kegiatan ditunjang dengan telepon genggam. Pemerintah Indonesia giat dalam menyuarakan aktifitas ekonomi yang dapat menunjang kehidupan masyarakat. Dalam hal ini UMKM (Unit Mikro Kecil Menengah) menjadi salah satu alternatif bagi masyarakat yang akan membuka suatu usaha dalam bidang tertentu yang tujuan utamanya adalah membuat suatu produk yang bernilai jual dan diminati oleh masyarakat umum. Produk UMKM dari berbagai produk yang dihasilkan oleh pelaku usaha di desa Sawojajar diarahkan dapat mempunyai ciri khas dan keunggulannya sendiri dengan mendaftarkan merek produknya untuk menarik minat konsumen agar dapat bersaing dengan produk-produk yang dikemas oleh suatu perusahaan.Demi tercapainya hal tersebut maka perlu diketahui bagaimana para pelaku UMKM dapat membuat suatu merek yang menjadi ciri khas tersebut dan menjadi salah satu hak secara legal yang didapatkan. Sehingga dengan cara produk tersebut dipasarkat melalui market place atau dijual secara online tidak akan menimbulkan polemik hukum yang akan menghambat proses usaha berkembang menuju pemasaran global. Dalam proses produksi, masyarakat desa Sawojajar masih memiliki permasalahan terkait pendaftaran merek, izin , dan pemasaran. Hal tersebut memberikan dorongan kepada tim pengabdi Unila untuk mengadakan kegiatan sosialisasi Edukasi pendaftaran merek kepada perangkat desa dan pelaku UMKM menuju pemulihan ekonomi pasca Covid-19 didesa Sawojajar Kabupaten Lampung Utara.
Studi Perbandingan Kelembagaan dan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) dan the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) dengan International Criminal Court (ICC) Desia Rakhma Banjarani; Abdul Muthalib Tahar; Desy Churul Aini
Cepalo Vol 1 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v1no1.1754

Abstract

Pentingnya keberadaan pengadilan internasional ICTY, ICTR dan ICC dalam menangani kejahatan internasional dikarenakan pengadilan nasional dianggap tidak mampu untuk merespon kejahatan internasional. Hal tersebut dapat terjadi ketika pengadilan nasional mengalami kerusakan struktur dan sistem. Kerusakan struktur dan sistem pengadilan nasional dapat terjadi pasca suatu negara dilanda konflik yang serius seperti yang terjadi pada saat konflik di Yugoslavia dan Rwanda. Situasi seperti ini disebut sebagai ketidakmampuan (unability) suatu pengadilan nasional dalam mengadili pelaku kejahatan internasional. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah tentang bagaimana proses pembentukan, yurisdiksi, dan struktur ICTY, ICTR dan ICC? Dan apa saja persamaan dan perbedaan ICTY, ICTR, dan ICC? Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Proses pembentukan, pengaturan yurisdiksi dan struktur ICTY, ICTR dan ICC menunjukan: Pertama, dalam hal pembentukan ICTY, ICTR, dan ICC dilakukan melalui mekanisme yang berbeda. ICTY dan ICTR dibentuk berdasarkan resolusi Dewan Keamanan PBB, sedangkan ICC dibentuk melalui konferensi internasional. Kedua, pengaturan yurisdiksi ICTY, ICTR, dan ICC terdapat perbedaan dalam ruang lingkup yurisdiksi material, yurisdiksi teritorial, yurisdiksi personal, dan yurisdiksi temporal. Ketiga, dalam hal struktur organ menunjukan bahwa ICTY dan ICTR memiliki kesamaan identik yang terdiri dari chambers, registry, dan office of prosecutors. Sementara struktur organ ICC berbeda dengan ICTY dan ICTR, dimana struktur organ ICC terdiri dari presidency divisions, registry, dan office of prosecutors.Perbandingan Statuta ICTY, Statuta ICTR, dan Statuta Roma telah memperlihatkan perbedaan dan persamaan dalam berbagai aspek. Dalam hal persamaannya: Pertama, penggunaan prosedur umum persidangan; Kedua, prosedur perlindungan hukum saat proses persidangan berlangsung; Ketiga, secara substansi ketiga statuta tidak mengatur hukuman mati dalam pemidanaan terdakwa dan hanya menerapkan hukuman penjara seumur hidup. Dalam hal perbedaannya ketentuan yang termuat dalam Statuta ICTY, Statuta ICTR dan Statuta Roma meliputi beberapa aspek yaitu struktur organ, muatan prinsip umum hukum pidana, permohonan banding, peran Dewan Keamanan PBB, prosedur penyerahan kasus, kewajiban melakukan kerjasama, pendanaan dan prosedur amandemen. Kata Kunci: ICC, ICTR, ICTY dan Perbandingan.
Pengaturan Tentang Status Hukum “Illegal Immigrant” Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional, Hukum Nasional Dan Penanganannya Di Indonesia Desy Churul Aini
Jurnal Selat Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015): "Kemaritiman & Perbatasan"
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (84.219 KB)

Abstract

Indonesia constitutes state transit to divide illegal immigrant , asylum and refuge e seeker.International protection on refugees is managed in Convention 1951 and Protocols 1967 about status of Refugee. Indonesia until now haven’t ratification Convention 1951 and Protocols 1967 about status of Refugee, so no special national law that manages about status of and in the presence asylum seeker and Refugee at Indonesian. Handle on illegal immigrant , asylum and refugee seeker performed by Immigration General directorate as institute of expatriate supervisor that given by authority by Indonesia Government to do collaboration and asks for UNHCR’S help (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) and IOM (International Organizations for Migrant). About problem emerging while authority state establishment sentences illegal immigrant this becomes overlap among drd that institute. Keywords: Jurisdictional State, illegal immigrant
Pendampingan Edukasi Penggunaan Internet yang Efektif di Desa Margodadi, Kecamatan Padang Cermin, Provinsi Lampung Desy Churul Aini; Bayu Sujadmiko; Naek Siregar; Ahmad Syofyan; Isroni Muhammad Miraj Mirza
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 3 No 4 (2023): JPMI - Agustus 2023
Publisher : CV Infinite Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52436/1.jpmi.1122

Abstract

Internet merupakan salah satu media perwujudan hak asasi manusia untuk berkomunikasi dan memperoleh informasi yang dilaksanakan secara tertib dan bertanggung jawab berdasarkan moral, nilai-nilai agama, keamanan, dan ketertiban umum berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Pemerintah memfasilitasi pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan transaksi elektronik serta melindungi kepentingan umum dari segala jenis gangguan sebagai akibat penyalahgunaan informasi elektronik yang mengganggu ketertiban umum sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Banyak masyarakat Indonesia, terutama di pedesaan di wilayah Lampung, masih belum memiliki pemahaman utuh tentang cara penggunaan internet yang positif dan sehat. Salah satu desa yang secara pemahaman masih kurang akan hal itu ialah Desa Margodadi, Kecamatan Padang Cermin, Kabupaten Pesawaran, Provinsi Lampung. Fakta tersebut membuat desa ini sebagai salah satu desa yang secara informasi teknologi masih merlukan sosialisasi & pendidikan terkait penggunaan dan tantangan teknologi ke depannya. Fakta tersebut membuat tim dari Fakultas Hukum Univeritas Lampung, Jurusan Hukum Internasional untuk melakukan pendampingan dan edukasi agar masyarakat desa dalam penggunaan internet paham akibat hukum yang timbul dari kegiatan di dunia virtual. Sehingga masyarakat dapat secara maksimal menikmati manfaat internet demi peningkatan potensi ekonomi daerah dengan tetap meminimalisir dampak negatif penggunaan internet. Masyarakat yang paham hak dan kewajibannya tidak akan mudah terjerumus ke dalam kejahatan di dunia virtual. Metode yang digunakan ialah pendekatan gabungan normative dan sosiologis secara kualitatif. Hasil dari yang didapat setelah dilakukan penyuluhan di Desa Margodadi ialah terdapat peningkatan pemahaman yang cukup signifikan dari warga setempat akan tata cara penggunaan internet yang sehat dan aman.
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Armed Conflict under International Law Siregar, Naek; Aini, Desy Churul; Rehulina, Rehulina; Subandi, Agit Yogi; Mirza, Isroni Muhammad Miraj
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i2.5267

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a technological achievement that simulates human intelligence through machines or computer programs. The integration of AI in military operations aims to minimize combatant casualties and enhance effectiveness in warfare. Despite the advantages and significance of this research, concerns arise regarding the ideal implementation of AI in armed conflicts due to potential security challenges. A significant issue lies in the legal perspective governing AI as a comprehensive defense tool. This paper employs a juridical normative research method based on a statutory approach to provide a descriptive analysis and examine the regulatory framework surrounding AI in armed conflict. The results indicate that the absence of comprehensive regulations complicates the accountability framework, making liability determination intricate, particularly when AI malfunctions due to substandard quality or improper use. In such cases, accountability may extend to both the creator and the user. The concept of liability for violations in armed conflict is explored according to international law, highlighting the implications and associated responsibilities of using AI within legal principles. This paper concludes that AI regulation must be crafted to ensure usage aligns with established procedures within the framework of international law. 
Co-Authors Abdul Muthalib Tahar Agit Yogi Subandi Ahmad Syofyan Bayu Sujadmiko, Bayu Desia Rakhma Banjarani Isroni Muhammad Miraj Mirza Mirza, Isroni Muhammad Miraj NAEK SIREGAR Natamiharja, Rudi Rehulina Rehulina, Rehulina