Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Tugas Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam Pengurusan Harta Peninggalan Berdasarkan KUHPerdata Jeremia Manalu; Besty Habeahan
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November: Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1221

Abstract

The Heritage Center (BHP) is a government institution under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia that has a strategic role in civil law, especially related to the management of heritage property. Rooted in colonial regulations and regulated in the Civil Code, BHP is authorized to represent and protect the legal interests of individuals whose whereabouts are unknown, immature, or legally incompetent. This study aims to analyze the implementation of BHP's duties in managing heritage assets based on the provisions of the Civil Code and identify supporting and inhibiting factors for its implementation. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach and literature study. The results of the study show that BHP's position is as a subject of public law that carries out private legal functions. BHP's authority includes the management of unmanaged legacies, acting as a guardian or guardian, and acting as a curator in bankruptcy cases. Despite having a strong legal basis, the effectiveness of the implementation of BHP's duties in the field has not been optimal. The obstacles faced include limited resources, lack of public understanding, and coordination between agencies that has not been maximized. Therefore, systematic improvement efforts are needed through institutional capacity building, legal socialization, and strengthening regulations and cross-sector synergy to support the effective and sustainable implementation of BHP's tasks.
Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Pengurusan Wasiat Tertutup di Balai Harta Peninggalan Widya Yuniati Siregar; Besty Habeahan
Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November : Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i4.1209

Abstract

A will is a legal instrument that enables an individual to determine the distribution of their assets after death. One type recognized in the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) is the closed will (testament olograph), written or signed confidentially by the testator and submitted to a notary before four witnesses. This form of will emphasizes secrecy and the protection of the testator’s final intentions, requiring a clear legal framework to ensure its validity and lawful execution. Within this framework, the Balai Harta Peninggalan, or Heritage Hall, functions as a state institution responsible for receiving, safeguarding, unsealing, and executing closed wills after the testator’s death. The institution’s role ensures that the process is orderly, transparent, and legally compliant. This study examines the procedural mechanism for administering closed wills by the Balai Harta Peninggalan, covering the stages from unsealing to execution in accordance with statutory provisions. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes the Civil Code, implementing regulations, and legal literature. The findings show that the execution of closed wills under Balai Harta Peeninggalan’s authority is well regulated under Indonesian law and plays a key role in ensuring legal certainty and protecting heirs’ rights. However, administrative obstacles and low public awareness remain significant challenges.
Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Kreditur Konkuren dalam Proses Kepailitan Berdasarkan Undang Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Hutagaol, Panri; Besty Habeahan
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 05 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i05.1894

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan serta perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur konkuren dalam proses kepailitan berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, literatur dan disertai telaah terhadap doktrin dan putusan pengadilan niaga maupun Mahkamah Agung yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif kreditur konkuren dijamin melalui asas paritas creditorium dan asas pari passu pro rata parte yang bersumber dari Pasal 1131 dan 1132 KUHPerdata serta Pasal 189 Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004; namun, dalam praktik posisi mereka tetap rentan akibat dominannya eksekusi jaminan oleh kreditur separatis dan tingginya prioritas kreditur preferen. Efektivitas perlindungan kreditur konkuren sangat bergantung pada transparansi dan akuntabilitas kurator, pengawasan hakim pengawas, konsistensi penerapan asas kepailitan oleh pengadilan, serta pemanfaatan upaya hukum seperti keberatan, renvoi prosedur, actio pauliana, dan pembatalan perdamaian.