Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Governance

Segregasi Residensial dan Intersubyektivitas Kewarganegaraan Masyarakat Desa Oi Bura Rahmad Hidayat
Journal of Governance Volume 3, Issue 1: (2018) June
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (890.284 KB) | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v3i1.882

Abstract

Abstract : This paper tries to explore the practice of residential segregation in a village and its impact on the villagers’ comprehension about the concept of citizenship. The process of separating the residential location of a group who came from Bali with other groups in the village of Oi Bura of Tambora sub-district in Bima district reflects the immortal existing of colonial legacies in the form of ethnic and religious residential segregation. As a result, these practices have triggered the emergence of social distance among social groups and then hurt the principle of social inclusion or social solidarity as major dimensions of citizenship.Keywords: villagers; intersubjectivity; residential segregation; colonial legacy; production-based social structure; citizenship.Abstrak : Tulisan ini hendak mengungkap praktek segregasi residensial di sebuah desa dan dampaknya terhadap pemahaman warga desa tentang konsep kewarganegaraan. Proses pemisahan lokasi pemukiman sekelompok orang yang berasal dari Bali dengan kelompok lainnya di Desa Oi Bura Kecamatan Tambora Kabupaten Bima mencerminkan keberlangsungan abadi warisan-warisan kolonial dalam bentuk segregasi residensial etnis dan agama sekaligus. Imbasnya, praktek tersebut telah memicu kemunculan jarak sosial antarkelompok masyarakat dan mencederai prinsip inklusi sosial atau solidaritas sosial yang menjadi dimensi utama kewarganegaraan.Kata kunci: warga desa; intersubyektivitas; segregasi residensial; warisan kolonial; struktur sosial berbasis produksi; kewarganegaraan.
The Steep Road to Institutionalizing Negotiable Governance in the Management of Village Development Rahmad Hidayat; Hendra Hendra; Muhamad Iptidaiyah
Journal of Governance Volume 4, Issue 1: (2019) June
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (903.97 KB) | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v4i1.5369

Abstract

Law No. 6/2014 on Villages becomes the rule of application of negotiable governance in the management of village development. Authority in this domain must be translated as a negotiation space for various stakeholders. Accessibility of public participation in any regular citizenship forum must be guaranteed to be fulfilled by the Village Government, in line with the willingness of this village-scale authoritative institution to create public information transparency. This paper aims to examine the level of institutionalization of negotiable governance in the management of development in Bajo Village, Soromandi Sub-District, Bima District. As qualitative research with a descriptive approach, this research utilized in-depth interviews, observation, document tracking, and document analysis techniques in which a number of village government apparatus and villagers were used as informants to mine the data. The results of this study show that institutionalizing negotiable governance has not been taken seriously because the public participation in regular citizenship forums in Bajo Village is only possible because of "invitation" from the village government alone. The politicization of the public space seems only to be positioned as a mere formality through that "invitation" mechanism. Participatory governance seems to exist, but it is not implemented properly. More than that, the availability of information access is still very limited and relies heavily on the willingness of the village government to provide it to all existing residents. Certain information can only be accessed by the people who have the closest relationship with certain village officials, not villagers in general. The communication media is still limited to the existing formal forum which is believed to remain exclusive because it only involves certain elements of the community, who cannot possibly represent the needs of all groups of society.
DEPOLITICISATION OF PUBLIC ISSUE:LOW DEGREE OF GOVERNMENT’S DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY (The Case of the Reclamation Policy of Benoa Bay, Bali, Indonesia) M. Dian Hikmawan; Rahmad Hidayat
Journal of Governance Volume 1, Issue 1: (2016) December
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (630.238 KB) | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v1i1.1311

Abstract

Abstrak: Tulisan ini mengkaji praktik De-politisasi isu publik yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. De-politisasi isu dan kepentingan publik memicu terjadinya deficit demokrasi suatu negara. De-politisasi melalui negasi atas akses dan pembatasan atas ruang publik dalam membahas kebijakan yang berkaitan langsung dengan kepentingan Negara. Atas dasar hal tersebut, kebijakan reklamasi Pulau Benoa di Bali-Indonesia dijadikan sebagai objek analisa jurnal ini. Reklamasi Pulau Benoa disinyalir sebagai praktek de-politisasi isu publik yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Daerah Bali.Kata Kunci: Depolitisasi, Pemerintah, Elit, Publik dan Demokrasi.
POTENSI PELANGGARAN HAK ATAS PROPERTI PRIVAT DALAM PEMBANGUNAN FASILITAS PUBLIK (Kasus Pembangunan Bandara Internasional Kulonprogo) Rahmad Hidayat
Journal of Governance Volume 2, Issue 1: (2017) June
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (710.806 KB) | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v2i1.2123

Abstract

this paper tries to explore deeply about the potential of violation of citizens’ economic, social, and cultural rights by state (government) in the public infrastructure building project. One of EcoSoC rights that potential to be violated is right to private property i.e. individual house and land. Such rights violation is manifested in the form of forced eviction conducted by government to take over the citizens’ asset and land that defined as a site or location for building certain public facilities. The construction of Kulonprogo International Airport in Yogyakarta is positioned as the main object of analysis. To find out the right answer, I use a case study approach while utilizing the case of construction of Lombok International Airport in 2006-2011 as a comparison.
Institutional Accessibility in Providing Development Data as a Primary Dimension of the Village Government's Public Accountability Muhammad Taufiq; Rahmad Hidayat
Journal of Governance Volume 9 Issue 1: (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v9i1.20634

Abstract

This essay examines the extent to which the village government is institutionally accessible in conveying development data to its citizens. Dervin (1973) defines institutional accessibility as the ability and willingness of public institutions to provide individuals with essential information. The easily accessible nature of such governmental entities would result in greater accountability and transparency in government administration, development, and community responsibility, which are constitutional obligations of state institutions. The authors describe the Rabakodo Village administration's level of public accountability in managing development operations, as evidenced by institutional accessibility to creating general information disclosure. This is a descriptive-qualitative study that uses focus group discussions and in-depth interviews as the primary methods of data collection. Public accountability may not have been fully implemented up to this point due to the lack of serious consideration given to the attempts to develop responsible village governance in Rabakodo Village. The lack of sincerity can be seen in the absence of adequate communication media to publicize the village development program while meeting the community's needs for information on specific development operations. The village government's failure to optimize the availability of different communication platforms and provide full access to village development information posed a barrier to increasing participatory democracy, inclusiveness, and public accountability. Such a low level of institutional accessibility steadily diminishes the possibility of confronting detrimental practices, non-populist policies, and the corrupt orientation of village-level state actors.
Unveiling the Strategic Model of Political Lies Firmansyah Firmansyah; Muhammad Sauki; Rahmad Hidayat
Journal of Governance Volume 9 Issue 2: (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v9i2.22787

Abstract

This article delves into the strategic model of political lies, highlighting the intricate nature of this phenomenon within a political framework. Politicians use various strategies to formulate and disseminate lies, ranging from positive campaigns to negative ones. In positive campaigns, lies create a more favorable public perception of politicians, while in negative campaigns, these undermine opponents' standing, instill doubt, and undermine their credibility. Politicians derive immediate advantages from political lies, such as increased popularity and favorable public perceptions, but must also consider potential future costs, including forfeiting public trust and political ramifications. The strategies employed to deal with political lies vary significantly based on political circumstances. Politicians navigate the delicate balance between short-term political advantage and upholding ethical principles in the political sphere. Political lies can quickly garner support and enhance popularity, but they can also undermine public trust, diminish political credibility, and have enduring consequences for a politician's image. Addressing the issue of political lying requires a multifaceted approach that tackles its root causes while safeguarding democratic principles. Voters are crucial to maintaining accountability by exercising their right to vote and assuming control over the democratic process.
The Complexities of Annual Reserved Land Leasing in Indonesia: Insights From A Specific Local Context Ishaka, Mukhlis; Hidayat, Rahmad
Journal of Governance Volume 9 Issue 4: (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v9i4.28992

Abstract

Taking economic benefits from reserved land became a considerable business for many local governments worldwide, including the Bima Regency Government, through an annual leasing policy. Besides its success story, which can increase regional original income, the policy implementation also leaves complicated problems, often characterized by the tension of the struggle for management rights and negative accusations regarding the auction process, which needs to be more transparent. This article discusses an empirical case about the tension of actor relations in the scramble for limited resources in a local context, where the authors conducted in-depth interviews with several informants who were selected through purposive sampling techniques, including those in charge, directors, and leaders of the Regency Level Committee, as well as individual participants, both those who won and lost in the annual leasing auction. Although the land leasing policy can increase local original income and provide opportunities for landless residents to engage in agricultural activities, the auction practice is often marked by a need for more transparency and conflicts of interest. Such a conflict is especially evident in the uneven auction process, which tends to trigger stakeholder tensions. This policy has yet to be entirely successful in supporting land conservation for long-term agricultural production regarding the threat of land degradation due to excessive exploitation.
Looking at Seven Years of Published Research Through a Bibliometric Lens (JSEAHR in Focus) Firmansyah, Firmansyah; Sauki, Muhammad; Hidayat, Rahmad
Journal of Governance Volume 10 Issue 1: (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v10i1.24489

Abstract

This bibliometric review used Excel spreadsheet tabulations and the VOSviewer software to analyze 92 research articles from 2017 to 2023 to discover productivity patterns, collaboration networks, and research trends in JSEAHR. The findings show a fluctuating production pattern of JSEAHR's annual publications, reflecting the dynamics of contributions by human rights researchers in Southeast Asia. Examination of authorship patterns highlighted individual researcher dedication and collaborative efforts, with 51 single and 41 multi-author articles. The geographic distribution of authors involves 23 countries, and Indonesia emerges as the central contributor with 76 authors. The institutional affiliation analysis highlights the diversity of contributors from leading higher education institutions in various countries as well as government and non-government institutions. Exploration also detected a diversity of research methodologies, with conceptual-normative and juridical-sociological approaches as dominant. The Scopus database confirms the citation influence of JSEAHR, with 71 indexed pieces of literature, 38 of which have citation data. Various global journals across disciplines reference this journal, contributing to its increasingly widespread impact. Relevant to future research directions, there are potential areas that researchers could hope in on further, such as transitional justice, disability rights, and environmental rights. In conclusion, this bibliometric analysis positions JSEAHR as a significant platform for diverse and impactful research on human rights issues. To ensure the continued influence of this journal in shaping a comprehensive global narrative on human rights in the post-COVID-19 era, it is crucial to maintain its collaborative and interdisciplinary spirit as it navigates an evolving landscape.