Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

EQUIPMENT STANDARDIZATION IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARDS IN CONSTRUCTION WORK REVIEWED FROM LAW NUMBER 2 OF 2017 CONCERNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LAW NUMBER 13 OF 2003 CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT AND FIDIC Sheehan Ariel Mohammed Gaffar; Purnama Trisnamansyah; Holyness N Singadimedja
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i1.2658

Abstract

The implementation of equipment standardization and occupational health and safety (OHS) in construction projects in Indonesia is regulated through several laws and regulations and refers to international guidelines such as ILO Convention No. 155 of 1981 concerning Occupational Health and Safety and FIDIC. Although these regulations require compliance with technical, safety, and occupational health standards, their implementation still experiences various obstacles. This can be seen from the continued use of obsolete and uncertified equipment, as well as the high number of work accidents. To improve the effectiveness of standardization, the supervision and law enforcement system in Indonesia can be compared with other countries such as the Philippines. Therefore, reform efforts are needed in supervision, enforcement of sanctions, and increased education to increase awareness and compliance with OHS standards, so as to protect workers and create a safe and sustainable work environment.
Assessing DANANTARA's Alignment with the Santiago Principles: Indonesia's Sovereign Wealth Fund Legal Regime in Comparative Perspective Dharmma Justitio Hermawan; Prita Amalia; Purnama Trisnamansyah
Unram Law Review Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v10i1.479

Abstract

This article examines the alignment of Indonesia’s newly established sovereign wealth fund, Daya Anagata Nusantara (Danantara), with the Santiago Principles on the global best-practice standards for sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). Danantara was created by Law No. 1 of 2025 (Third Amendment to the SOE Law) and subsequently governed under Law No. 16 of 2025 (Fourth Amendment) as a transformative vehicle to manage key state-owned assets, raising questions about its governance, transparency, and adherence to international norms. This study situates Danantara’s legal and institutional framework against the Santiago Principles’ guidelines, analyzing convergences, gaps, and challenges. It first clarifies the Santiago Principles’ content, legal status as soft law, and persuasive force in guiding SWF behavior globally. It then details Indonesia’s SWF architecture post-2025, highlighting Danantara’s objectives, structure, and regulatory provisions. The core analysis compares Danantara’s governance and operations with Santiago Principle benchmarks, revealing areas of harmony (such as a clear legal basis and objectives) and divergence (notably in independent oversight and transparency). A comparative discussion draws lessons from renowned SWFs: Temasek (Singapore) and Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) to contextualize Danantara’s approach. The article finds that while Danantara’s establishment represents a bold shift aligning in part with global best practices, critical improvements are needed to fully realize the Santiago Principles, especially in insulating the fund from political influence and enhancing accountability. The conclusion offers recommendations for strengthening Danantara’s governance and suggests that harmonizing with the Santiago Principles is vital for building credibility, attracting investment, and ensuring the fund’s long-term success.