Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.624
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurisprudence Unram Law Review Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat Widya Yuridika Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Jurnal Bedah Hukum Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Global Ilmiah Transnational Business Law Journal Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Purnama Trisnamansyah
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
EQUIPMENT STANDARDIZATION IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARDS IN CONSTRUCTION WORK REVIEWED FROM LAW NUMBER 2 OF 2017 CONCERNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LAW NUMBER 13 OF 2003 CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT AND FIDIC Sheehan Ariel Mohammed Gaffar; Purnama Trisnamansyah; Holyness N Singadimedja
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i1.2658

Abstract

The implementation of equipment standardization and occupational health and safety (OHS) in construction projects in Indonesia is regulated through several laws and regulations and refers to international guidelines such as ILO Convention No. 155 of 1981 concerning Occupational Health and Safety and FIDIC. Although these regulations require compliance with technical, safety, and occupational health standards, their implementation still experiences various obstacles. This can be seen from the continued use of obsolete and uncertified equipment, as well as the high number of work accidents. To improve the effectiveness of standardization, the supervision and law enforcement system in Indonesia can be compared with other countries such as the Philippines. Therefore, reform efforts are needed in supervision, enforcement of sanctions, and increased education to increase awareness and compliance with OHS standards, so as to protect workers and create a safe and sustainable work environment.
Assessing DANANTARA's Alignment with the Santiago Principles: Indonesia's Sovereign Wealth Fund Legal Regime in Comparative Perspective Dharmma Justitio Hermawan; Prita Amalia; Purnama Trisnamansyah
Unram Law Review Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v10i1.479

Abstract

This article examines the alignment of Indonesia’s newly established sovereign wealth fund, Daya Anagata Nusantara (Danantara), with the Santiago Principles on the global best-practice standards for sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). Danantara was created by Law No. 1 of 2025 (Third Amendment to the SOE Law) and subsequently governed under Law No. 16 of 2025 (Fourth Amendment) as a transformative vehicle to manage key state-owned assets, raising questions about its governance, transparency, and adherence to international norms. This study situates Danantara’s legal and institutional framework against the Santiago Principles’ guidelines, analyzing convergences, gaps, and challenges. It first clarifies the Santiago Principles’ content, legal status as soft law, and persuasive force in guiding SWF behavior globally. It then details Indonesia’s SWF architecture post-2025, highlighting Danantara’s objectives, structure, and regulatory provisions. The core analysis compares Danantara’s governance and operations with Santiago Principle benchmarks, revealing areas of harmony (such as a clear legal basis and objectives) and divergence (notably in independent oversight and transparency). A comparative discussion draws lessons from renowned SWFs: Temasek (Singapore) and Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) to contextualize Danantara’s approach. The article finds that while Danantara’s establishment represents a bold shift aligning in part with global best practices, critical improvements are needed to fully realize the Santiago Principles, especially in insulating the fund from political influence and enhancing accountability. The conclusion offers recommendations for strengthening Danantara’s governance and suggests that harmonizing with the Santiago Principles is vital for building credibility, attracting investment, and ensuring the fund’s long-term success.
The Urgency of Regulating Anti-Circumvention Rules in Indonesia and ASEAN: The Case of Alleged Circumvention of Indonesian Refined Sugar to Vietnam Fasri Dimas Kristian Pramono; Huala Adolf; Purnama Trisnamansyah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3395

Abstract

This study examines how the absence of anti‑circumvention rules in ASEAN and Indonesia weakens the effectiveness of anti‑dumping measures, as seen in the case of alleged circumvention of Indonesian refined sugar to Vietnam. The purpose of this study is to determine the implications of the absence of anti‑circumvention rules in ASEAN on the circumvention of anti-dumping measures as seen in the Indonesia–Vietnam case, and to determine the urgency of regulating anti‑circumvention rules in ASEAN in an effort to prevent the circumvention of anti‑dumping measures in Indonesia and ASEAN. The research method used is normative juridical, coupled with a case study of the alleged Indonesia–Vietnam circumvention, as well as a comparative study of various anti‑circumvention legal instruments in Vietnam, the European Union, and the United States. The results show three main implications. First, legal uncertainty over Vietnam’s unilateral measures; Second, procedural fragmentation that hinders cooperation; and third, the failure to set a binding precedent. The comparative study shows that clear regional rules (clear definitions, objective testing, structured procedural standards, exemptions for genuine operators, and strengthened rules of origin) enhance legal certainty while limiting the abuse of measures. The conclusion that can be drawn is that ASEAN needs to immediately regulate anti‑circumvention rules, along with strengthening rules on origin certification. Gradual implementation at the intra‑ASEAN level will build regional habits and common ground, protect domestic industries, and reduce legal and trade friction.
Legitimasi Kebijakan Tarif Resiprokal Amerika Serikat Terhadap Indonesia Dalam Kerangka Prinsip Most Favoured Nation WTO dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Lalu Lintas Perdagangan Ekspor dan Impor Antara Indonesia Dengan Amerika Serikat Aliffio Danendra; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Purnama Trisnamansyah
Jurnal Global Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 11 (2026): Jurnal Global Ilmiah
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/jgi.v3i11.406

Abstract

Sistem perdagangan internasional yang dikembangkan oleh World Trade Organization (WTO) dibangun atas prinsip non-diskriminasi, yang diwujudkan melalui prinsip Most Favoured Nation (MFN) sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal I GATT 1994, yang mewajibkan negara anggota untuk memberikan setiap keuntungan perdagangan yang diberikan kepada satu mitra dagang secara otomatis dan tanpa syarat kepada seluruh anggota lainnya. Namun penerapan kebijakan tarif resiprokal Amerika Serikat melalui Executive Order 14257 dan Executive Order 14326 menetapkan tarif impor yang berbeda terhadap negara-negara mitra dagang termasuk Indonesia sehingga menimbulkan persoalan mengenai kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip MFN. Selain itu kebijakan tersebut juga berpotensi memengaruhi lalu lintas perdagangan antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat, mengingat hubungan dagang bilateral kedua negara yang signifikan. Oleh karena itu artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis legitimasi kebijakan tersebut dalam perspektif hukum WTO serta pengaruhnya terhadap perdagangan bilateral antara Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan interdisipliner yang memadukan analisis doktrin hukum dengan perspektif perdagangan internasional dan ekonomi, dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui kajian terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan tersebut bertentangan dengan prinsip MFN karena memberlakukan perlakuan tarif yang berbeda-beda tanpa dasar non-diskriminasi yang seragam, dan tidak memenuhi persyaratan pengecualian sebagaimana diatur dalam GATT 1994 yang hanya membolehkan penyimpangan dari prinsip MFN dalam keadaan terbatas tertentu. Meskipun demikian, dampaknya terhadap perdagangan bilateral pada tahun 2025 belum signifikan karena masih dipengaruhi daya saing produk Indonesia, penyesuaian harga oleh pelaku usaha, mekanisme cost sharing antara mitra dagang, dan mekanisme kontrak preorder yang memungkinkan transaksi tetap berjalan sesuai kesepakatan sebelum kebijakan tarif diberlakukan.
Co-Authors AA Agustia Sinta Dewi Aliffio Danendra Alya Rahmayani Amelia Sundari Waliyani An An Chandrawulan An An Chandrawulan An-An Chandrawulan An-An Chandrawulan Anan Chandrawulan Anita Afriana Arumadanti Poerwanto Dandrivanto Budhijanto Dena Zahra Aulia Denisa Sugih Ayu Dewi Kania Sugiharti Dharmma Justitio Hermawan Divanadia, Dessandra Etty Mulyati Fakhri, Muhammad Ibnu Fasri Dimas Kristian Pramono Fauzi Maulana Hakim Helitha Novianty Muchtar Hilmansyah, Salma Syifaya Holyness N Singadimedja Huala Adolf Inzaghi, Rafly Nauval Isis Ikhwansyah Isis Ikhwansyah Isis Ikhwansyah Isis Ikhwansyah Karami, Ahmad Adib Misridaputri*, Syifa Salsabila Musu, Clara Nadhilah Mustika Owen, Patrick Prita Amalia, Prita Pupung Faisal Purba, Tesalonika Putri Pinuram Rambe Quinnashya Pradipta Early Folanda Rahmat, Rizka Raniah Rezkyna, Nabilah Rizka Raniah Rahmat Salfia Putri Sakina Sheehan Ariel Mohammed Gaffar Sinta Dewi Stephen Wongso Syifa Salsabila Misridaputri* Tamara Sulistio, Chealse Yani Pujiwati Yusuf Saepul Zamil