Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.419
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Yustisia Lentera Hukum DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Ius Constituendum Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Awang Long Law Review Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Majalah Hukum Nasional Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Indonesian Journal of International Law Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Community: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Transnational Business Law Journal Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)
Prita Amalia, Prita
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL MENURUT HUKUM INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Anindita, Sashia Diandra; Amalia, Prita
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (314.283 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakPembentukan Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS)  merupakan angin segar bagi para pihak yang menggunakan arbitrase dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dalam menyelenggarakan lembaga ini di Indonesia. UU Arbitrase dan APS mengatur putusan arbitrase internasional dalam rangka mengakomodir arbitrase internasional. Permasalahan timbul terhadap klasifikasi putusan arbitrase internasional karena rumusan definisi putusan arbitrase internasional dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS. Definisi yang diatur berbeda dengan definisi Arbitrase internasional dalam Hukum Internasional yakni  United Nations Commission On Interational Trade Law : Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai implikasi penerapan klasifikasi menurut hukum Indonesia terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus yang memiliki unsur internasional. Menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis-normatif dalam menganalisa kasus untuk menjawab permasalahan dalam artikel ini dengan menitikberatkan pada data kepustakaan dan data primer yang berkaitan dengan hukum arbitrase internasional. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian dalam penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS, hukum internasional dan  praktik-praktik negara lain (Brunei Darussalam, Singapura dan  Hong Kong). Penerapan klasifikasi  Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS  berimplikasi terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik dengan  meluasnya kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus arbitrase yang memiliki unsur asing.Kata Kunci : arbitrase internasional, klasifikasi putusan arbitrase, UNCITRAL Model Law Abstract The establishment of the Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (ADS) act  becomes a new hope for parties who seek legal certainity using arbitration. The act accomodates international arbitration awards by putting the recognition for the awards into its scope of application. The problem arises in regards with the classification of international arbitration. The definition of international arbitration award under the act is different with international arbitration definition under International Law, espescially wit definition from United Nations Commission on Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). This article will discuss the issue arises on how the implication of using Indonesian classification towards the authority of domestic court in arbitration with foreign elements cases. The author used juridical-normative and case-analysing approach to further examine the problems in this thesis by researching on literary data and secondary data that are related to international commercial arbitration law. To conclude, there is incompatibility between Indonesian classification of International Arbitration, with intenational law and parctices of other countries (Brunei darussalam, Singapore and Hong Kong). The implication of the classification in Indonesian Arbitration and ADS is that domestic court jurisdiction expands to arbitration with foreign element cases.Keywords : classification of arbitration award,  international arbitration award, UNCITRAL Model Law
Optimalisasi Peran Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) pada Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA) Ikhwansyah, Isis; Chandrawulan, An An; Amalia, Prita
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 2, December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0110.150-161

Abstract

ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) which came into effect since 2015 requires the creativity of the Indonesian society in competing with other ASEAN countries. One of the necessary strategies in dealing with AEC is to optimize the role of the State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN). With regards to the implementation of the AEC, it is important to provide adequate regulation in order to ensure legal certainty for BUMN. The main purpose of this research is to discover form of national regulation that can maximize business opportunity for BUMN in AEC era. It is found that the existing regulations have not yet given business opportunity for BUMN in AEC era. The existing regulations are contradictory one to another especially relating to the status of the state finance inserted as capital into BUMN. In addition, the Constitutional Court decision Number 48/PUU-XI/2013 maintained that the capital inserted into BUMN is considered as part of the state finance. Therefore, this brings about fundamental impact on future cases since the nature of the Constitutional Court decision is erga omnes.
Asymmetrical Arbitration Clauses: A Comparative Study of International and Indonesian Arbitration Law Lingkanaya, Jovanka; Adolf, Huala; Amalia, Prita
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 16, No 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v16i1.29522

Abstract

This article presents a study of the validity of asymmetrical arbitration clauses, a clause that combines arbitration and a choice of court option, in international commercial contracts. These clauses designate a method of dispute settlement that gives a more favorable position for one of the parties to a contract, hence, creating a debate on its validity on an international level. Despite the convenience the trend has brought in business, this form of arbitration clause has been called into doubt by courts in numerous jurisdictions. Unfortunately, Indonesia itself has yet to have a firm legal standing on this matter as asymmetrical arbitration clauses are not explicitly regulated by the Indonesian arbitration law. This research is conducted by exploring the relation between theories and practices concerning asymmetrical arbitration clauses through analyzing case law and provisions of international arbitration law and the Indonesian arbitration law, and are also analyzed through principles of international and Indonesian contract law. This article aims to provide an analysis regarding the legal effects of having asymmetrical arbitration clauses in commercial contracts and commercial arbitration. Lastly, this study offers a method of interpretation towards such clauses that favors their validity under both international arbitration law and Indonesian arbitration law.
POTENSI UMKM DI PANGANDARAN DALAM MENGHADAPI MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN An An Chandrawulan; Dandrivanto Budhijanto; Isis Ikhwansyah; Dewi Kania Sugiharti; Prita Amalia; Purnama Trisnamansyah; Pupung Faisal; Helitha Novianty Muchtar
Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/kumawula.v3i2.24861

Abstract

Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) diharapkan dapat menjadi salah satu sektor ekonomi dalam penggerak roda perekonomian nasional dengan kontribusi dan perannya dalam menyerap tenaga kerja lebih banyak dibanding entitas bisnis lainny. Selain itu, UMKM yang terkhususnya berada di Kabupaten Pangandaran memiliki berbagai macam keunikan baik dari jenis kegiatan usaha, produk, maupun hal lainnya yang memiliki potensi dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA). Namun, permasalahan yang umum dihadapi pelaku UMKM seperti keterbatasan permodalan, SDM yang kurang kompeten dibidangnya dan penggunaan teknologi perlu mendapat dukungan dari berbagai pihak dalam bentuk penguatan. Metodologi pada penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengambilan data dengan cara mengumpulkan dara melalui wawancara dan observasi. Selain itu, sumber data lainnya berasal dari peraturan perundang-undangan, jurnal ilmiah dan sebagainya. Tujuan penelian ini guna meningkatkan potensi UMKM dalam menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UMKM) are expected to become one of the economic sectors in driving the national economy with their contribution and role in absorbing more labor compared to other business entities. In addition, SMEs, especially those in Pangandaran Regency, have a variety of uniqueness both from the types of business activities, products, and other things that have the potential to face the ASEAN Economic Community (MEA). However, common problems faced by MSMEs such as limited capital, human resources who are less competent in their fields and the use of technology need support from various parties in the form of strengthening. The methodology in this research is descriptive qualitative. Data collection techniques by collecting data through interviews and observations. In addition, other data sources come from laws and regulations, scientific journals and so on. The purpose of this study is to increase the potential of MSMEs in facing the ASEAN Economic Community (MEA).
Implementation Regionalization Principle Based on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement According to Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Velicia Theoartha Manalu; Sinta Dewi Rosadi; Prita Amalia
Yustisia Vol 10, No 2: August 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v10i2.44710

Abstract

The practice of the regionalization principle in Article 6 Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement is still conflicted. This is because of several cases regarding the members misinterpretation of international guidelines in the regionalization principle, such as India – Agricultural Products and Russia – Pigs (EU). Recently, Coronavirus Diseases 2019 (Covid-19) has been considered to affect animal trade. Such conditions prompt the World Trade Organization (WTO)  to recommend the Members to take SPS Measures to protect their domestic market. However, the trade would be inhibited in case the country-wide ban approach is applied. Therefore, this paper discusses the possible SPS measures under the regionalization principle to promote the trade during the pandemic according to WTO decisions from previous cases in line with the VCLT of 1969. The research result shows that the Covid-19 is an obstacle to international trade and makes humans and animals vulnerable to this virus. Consequently, many animal trades have been banned to prevent its spread. To deal with this condition, Indonesia could apply the regionalization principle in Article 6 SPS Agreement. Moreover, the government should update the quarantine law by pointing out the regionalization principle, unlike the zone system rules only applied to animals susceptible to Food Mouth Disease
The ISDS Mechanism and Standards of Protection in the Investment Treaty Pandu Rizky Putra Pratama; Prita Amalia
Lentera Hukum Vol 7 No 2 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v7i2.17348

Abstract

International investment activities require legal certainty for investors. While the host country also needs legal certainty related to state sovereignty, legal protection is needed for investors and the host country to realize legal certainty in investment activities. Countries in the world entered into investment agreements to provide legal protection for investment activities. In investment agreements, generally, there are requirements to comply with the national law of the host country to get protection from investment agreements. This study aims to review the implications of not fulfilling the obligations in the investment agreement to apply the benefits contained therein, specifically regarding ISDS mechanism and protection standards. This study finds that the impact of the non-fulfillment of these obligations on the ISDS mechanism depends on the admission clause specified in the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT). On standards of protection, it refers to general principles of international law and arbitration decisions, investments that violate these obligations do not receive international legal protection. This research suggests the Indonesian Government tighten the admission clause in the BIT to prevent investors from using the ISDS mechanism in the BIT and to specify the impact of violating obligations to comply with the national laws of the host country. KEYWORDS: International Investment Law, Standards of Protection, Bilateral Investment Treaty
INDONESIA DAN ICSID: PENGECUALIAN YURISDIKSI ICSID OLEH KEPUTUSAN PRESIDEN Prita Amalia; Garry Gumelar Pratama
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 48 No. 1 (2018): Majalah Hukum Nasional Nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v48i1.110

Abstract

Indonesia telah meratifikasi Washington Convention 1965 melalui Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1968. Pasal 25 dari konvensi yang diratifikasi mengatur tentang yurisdiksi lembaga arbitrase International Centre for The Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID), di antaranya adalah untuk menyelesaikan sengketa penanaman modal antara para negara peserta (dan warga negara dari negara peserta). Beberapa Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) yang disepakati menunjuk lembaga arbitrase ICSID sebagai lembaga penyelesaian sengketa apabila terjadi permasalahan. Namun demikian, pada tahun 2012, pemerintah mengeluarkan Keputusan Presiden No. 31 Tahun 2012 tentang Perselisihan yang dikecualikan dari yurisdiksi ICSID. Keputusan tersebut mengecualikan beberapa sengketa dari kewenangan ICSID. Sebagai hasil penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif, artikel ini berusaha untuk menjawab pertanyaan mengenai apakah tindakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Indonesia untuk mengecualikan jurisdiksi ICSID sah berdasarkan hukum internasional yang berlaku. Dalam menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, selain harus dilakukan penelusuran hukum yang utuh menyeluruh, juga diperlukan pembahasan berbagai kasus yang relevan.
Countermeasures under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Between the Aircraft Manufacturing Industry and Society Ida Bagus Mahawira Nawagani; Prita Amalia; Helitha Novianty Muchtar
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Vol 5 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of law Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/UJLC.2021.v05.i01.p05

Abstract

Countermeasures under World Trade Organization (WTO) law are separated into two categories, remedies and a method to induce compliance after another defaulting state fails to adhere to WTO's panel recommendation. This article will focus on the second category. The term ‘countermeasures’ specifically refers to an act of suspension of concessions or other obligations. One case of granted countermeasures is DS316, a case between the United States of America (US) and the European Union (EU). The issue of this case is the subsidies granted by the EU for Airbus, an aircraft manufacturer based in Europe which consists of four European nations, which resulted in Boeing's market loss. The US then requested countermeasures authorisation by the WTO. Countermeasures are related to the principle of proportionality both under public international law and WTO law. Additionally, countermeasures can lead to a more complex situation since it affects the human rights of the private actors of international trade as a part of society. This article explains the implementation of both the countermeasures and the proportionality principle, and analyses the precedents of cases and the countermeasures granted by the WTO as well as the effects of the granted countermeasures to society as it creates barriers for all the international trade actors.
KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL MENURUT HUKUM INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Sashia Diandra Anindita; Prita Amalia
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 September 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAKPembentukan Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) merupakan angin segar bagi para pihak yang menggunakan arbitrase dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dalam menyelenggarakan lembaga ini di Indonesia. UU Arbitrase dan APS mengatur putusan arbitrase internasional dalam rangka mengakomodir arbitrase internasional. Permasalahan timbul terhadap klasifikasi putusan arbitrase internasional karena rumusan definisi putusan arbitrase internasional dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS. Definisi yang diatur berbeda dengan definisi Arbitrase internasional dalam Hukum Internasional yakni United Nations Commission On Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai implikasi penerapan klasifikasi menurut hukum Indonesia terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus yang memiliki unsur internasional. Menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis-normatif dalam menganalisa kasus untuk menjawab permasalahan dalam artikel ini dengan menitikberatkan pada data kepustakaan dan data primer yang berkaitan dengan hukum arbitrase internasional. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian dalam penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS, hukum internasional dan praktik-praktik negara lain (Brunei Darussalam, Singapura dan Hong Kong). Penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS berimplikasi terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik dengan meluasnya kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus arbitrase yang memiliki unsur asing.Kata kunci: arbitrase internasional; klasifikasi putusan arbitrase; UNCITRAL Model Law. ABSTRACTThe establishment of the Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (ADS) act becomes a new hope for parties who seek legal certainity using arbitration. The act accomodates international arbitration awards by putting the recognition for the awards into its scope of application. The problem arises in regards with the classification of international arbitration. The definition of international arbitration award under the act is different with international arbitration definition under International Law, espescially wit definition from United Nations Commission on Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). This article will discuss the issue arises on how the implication of using Indonesian classification towards the authority of domestic court in arbitration with foreign elements cases. The author used juridical-normative and case-analysing approach to further examine the problems in this thesis by researching on literary data and secondary data that are related to international commercial arbitration law. To conclude, there is incompatibility between Indonesian classification of International Arbitration, with intenational law and parctices of other countries (Brunei darussalam, Singapore and Hong Kong). The implication of the classification in Indonesian Arbitration and ADS is that domestic court jurisdiction expands to arbitration with foreign element cases.Keywords: classification of arbitration award; international arbitration award; UNCITRAL Model Law DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.4
MILITERISASI RUANG ANGKASA, QUO VADIS INDONESIA? Taufik Rachmat Nugraha; Prita Amalia
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 32, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.52601

Abstract

AbstractIn 2019 The US President was signing space policy directive IV which raised controversies across the globe. This decision is astonishing in recall that the 1968 Outer Space Treaty (the OST) in Art IV was prohibited from using the military by aggressive means. Furthermore, the space force will threaten the third-tier country like Indonesia and others to secure its own space assets, and since long ago Indonesia has actively promoted use of outer space peacefully. Finally, this paper will examine what the position of space force under the OST 1968 and how Indonesia should deal with it through socio-legal approach. IntisariPada tahun 2019 Presiden Amerika Serikat menandatangani Space Policy Directive IV yang menimbulkan beragam kontroversi dari berbagai negara. Keputusan ini cukup mengherankan dikarenakan dalam Pasal IV 1968 Outer Space Treaty (the OST) dengan jelas melarang penggunaan kekuatan militer dalam makna kekuatan yang bersifat agresif. Selanjutnya, keberadaan Space Force dapat mengancam negara tier ke-tiga seperti Indonesia untuk menjaga dan mengamankan asetnya di ruangangkasa, selain itu sejak dahulu Indonesia sangat aktif dalam mempromosikan penggunaan damai di ruangangkasa. Sebagai informasi, artikel ini akan menguji posisi Space Force dengan menggunakan the OST 1968 dan bagaimana posisi yangharus disikapi oleh Indonesia tentang hal tersebut dengan menggunakan pendekatan Socio-Legal.
Co-Authors AA Agustia Sinta Dewi Adi Nurzaman Adiza, Salza Fadila Afifah Zakiyatul Aulia Ahmad Farhan Baihaqqi Akbar, Amrul An An Chandrawulan An An Chandrawulan An An Chandrawulan Anhar Fauzan Priyono Anindita, Sashia Diandra Anindya Saraswati Ardiwinata Astuti, Violi Maulidya Charlieans Ning Aziz, Wahyu Rizkika Belaputri, Addyana Chandrawulan, An-An, Prof. Damos Dumoli Agusman Dandrivanto Budhijanto Danrivanto Budhijanto Dewanto, Jagad Putra Dewi Kania Sugiharti Dwi Linna Suswardany Erlien Erlien Aunina Linggar Aji Fachran, Syahreza Faradina, Tazky Aulia Fatimah Ibtisam Fery Irawan Garry Gumelar Pratama Hanan Aliya Putri Hayati, Aisyah Nur Helitha Novianty Muchtar Helitha Novianty Muchtar Huala Adolf Ida Bagus Mahawira Nawagani Inzaghi, Rafly Nauval IRAWAN, FERY Isis Ikhwansyah Isis Ikhwansyah Jessica Leonard Jonathan Matthew Jovanka Lingkanaya Kanris, Jesslyn Karami, Ahmad Adib Kurdi Kurdi Labib Wajdi, Muhammad Laksono, Wahyu Agung Leonard, Jessica Lingkanaya, Jovanka Makmun, M. Lazuardy Thariq Maulanisa, Hasna Fitri Nurzaman, Adi Nurzaman, R. Adi Owen, Patrick Pamungkas, Eksa Pamungkas, Eksa Pandu Rizky Putra Pratama Pupung Faisal Puput Mardiani Purba, Tesalonika Putri Pinuram Rambe Purnama Trisnamansyah Putri, Hanan Aliya Putri, Resha Roshana Qolby, Fatihatul Ramadhan, Ana Noviana Sashia Diandra Anindita Sinta Dewi Sinta Dewi Rosadi Suhendra, Hartono Syukri Syukri Taufik Rachmat Nugraha Velani Prastika Diyanto Velicia Theoartha Manalu Velly, Nicholas Vida Azaria Wahyu Agung Laksono Wangsit Restu Adi Guritno Wardhana, Yuki Mahardhito Adhitya Wawan Hermawan Wawan Hermawan Yogi Suprayogi Yogi Suprayogi Sugandi Yudi Azis