Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.753
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Lentera Hukum DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ius Constituendum Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Indonesian Journal of International Law Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Community: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Transnational Business Law Journal Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM)
Prita Amalia, Prita
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
KLASIFIKASI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL MENURUT HUKUM INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Anindita, Sashia Diandra; Amalia, Prita
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (314.283 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakPembentukan Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS)  merupakan angin segar bagi para pihak yang menggunakan arbitrase dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dalam menyelenggarakan lembaga ini di Indonesia. UU Arbitrase dan APS mengatur putusan arbitrase internasional dalam rangka mengakomodir arbitrase internasional. Permasalahan timbul terhadap klasifikasi putusan arbitrase internasional karena rumusan definisi putusan arbitrase internasional dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS. Definisi yang diatur berbeda dengan definisi Arbitrase internasional dalam Hukum Internasional yakni  United Nations Commission On Interational Trade Law : Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai implikasi penerapan klasifikasi menurut hukum Indonesia terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus yang memiliki unsur internasional. Menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis-normatif dalam menganalisa kasus untuk menjawab permasalahan dalam artikel ini dengan menitikberatkan pada data kepustakaan dan data primer yang berkaitan dengan hukum arbitrase internasional. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian dalam penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS, hukum internasional dan  praktik-praktik negara lain (Brunei Darussalam, Singapura dan  Hong Kong). Penerapan klasifikasi  Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS  berimplikasi terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik dengan  meluasnya kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus arbitrase yang memiliki unsur asing.Kata Kunci : arbitrase internasional, klasifikasi putusan arbitrase, UNCITRAL Model Law Abstract The establishment of the Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (ADS) act  becomes a new hope for parties who seek legal certainity using arbitration. The act accomodates international arbitration awards by putting the recognition for the awards into its scope of application. The problem arises in regards with the classification of international arbitration. The definition of international arbitration award under the act is different with international arbitration definition under International Law, espescially wit definition from United Nations Commission on Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). This article will discuss the issue arises on how the implication of using Indonesian classification towards the authority of domestic court in arbitration with foreign elements cases. The author used juridical-normative and case-analysing approach to further examine the problems in this thesis by researching on literary data and secondary data that are related to international commercial arbitration law. To conclude, there is incompatibility between Indonesian classification of International Arbitration, with intenational law and parctices of other countries (Brunei darussalam, Singapore and Hong Kong). The implication of the classification in Indonesian Arbitration and ADS is that domestic court jurisdiction expands to arbitration with foreign element cases.Keywords : classification of arbitration award,  international arbitration award, UNCITRAL Model Law
Optimalisasi Peran Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) pada Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA) Ikhwansyah, Isis; Chandrawulan, An An; Amalia, Prita
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 2, December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0110.150-161

Abstract

ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) which came into effect since 2015 requires the creativity of the Indonesian society in competing with other ASEAN countries. One of the necessary strategies in dealing with AEC is to optimize the role of the State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN). With regards to the implementation of the AEC, it is important to provide adequate regulation in order to ensure legal certainty for BUMN. The main purpose of this research is to discover form of national regulation that can maximize business opportunity for BUMN in AEC era. It is found that the existing regulations have not yet given business opportunity for BUMN in AEC era. The existing regulations are contradictory one to another especially relating to the status of the state finance inserted as capital into BUMN. In addition, the Constitutional Court decision Number 48/PUU-XI/2013 maintained that the capital inserted into BUMN is considered as part of the state finance. Therefore, this brings about fundamental impact on future cases since the nature of the Constitutional Court decision is erga omnes.
Asymmetrical Arbitration Clauses: A Comparative Study of International and Indonesian Arbitration Law Lingkanaya, Jovanka; Adolf, Huala; Amalia, Prita
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 16, No 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v16i1.29522

Abstract

This article presents a study of the validity of asymmetrical arbitration clauses, a clause that combines arbitration and a choice of court option, in international commercial contracts. These clauses designate a method of dispute settlement that gives a more favorable position for one of the parties to a contract, hence, creating a debate on its validity on an international level. Despite the convenience the trend has brought in business, this form of arbitration clause has been called into doubt by courts in numerous jurisdictions. Unfortunately, Indonesia itself has yet to have a firm legal standing on this matter as asymmetrical arbitration clauses are not explicitly regulated by the Indonesian arbitration law. This research is conducted by exploring the relation between theories and practices concerning asymmetrical arbitration clauses through analyzing case law and provisions of international arbitration law and the Indonesian arbitration law, and are also analyzed through principles of international and Indonesian contract law. This article aims to provide an analysis regarding the legal effects of having asymmetrical arbitration clauses in commercial contracts and commercial arbitration. Lastly, this study offers a method of interpretation towards such clauses that favors their validity under both international arbitration law and Indonesian arbitration law.
INDONESIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE INVESTOR–STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Leonard, Jessica; Amalia, Prita; Chandrawulan, An An
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 10, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Investment includes tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets are often connected with intellectual property which leads to intangible results. The lack of “visibility” in intangible assets makes them difficult to measure. Current international regulations have not also explicitly provided room for enforcement regarding intellectual property rights in terms of foreign investment. Therefore, an emergence of cases is observed in investment disputes within the field of intellectual property rights through the Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. In this research, we discuss cases of foreign investment disputes in such a field. From these cases, we find the factors that determine the occurrence of foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property rights. The ISDS mechanism can be used to resolve foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property. Furthermore, this research discusses the perspective of Indonesian law regarding foreign investment disputes in the mentioned field by using the ISDS mechanism. Qualitative methods and secondary data analysis are also used. The research aims to discover and identify foreign investment disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.
PERINGKAT ARUS INVESTASI INDONESIA DALAM KERANGKA ASEAN-CHINA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (PERBANDINGAN DENGAN SINGAPURA, MALAYSIA, THAILAND, DAN VIETNAM) DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT Putri, Resha Roshana; Chandrawulan, An-An, Prof.; Amalia, Prita
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the investment sector in ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement, all host countries are obligated to give the protections and legal certainty for investors in fair and equitable treatment principle. The investment relation in ACFTA is not only talking about the relation between Indonesia and China, but also how Indonesia shall compete with another ASEAN member states. Authors use juridical normative research method with literature studies. This research shows that Indonesia has not completely implemented the fair and equitable treatment for Chinese investors. There are the needs for changes in giving the protections for investors, specially in law and administration sides. The aim of giving this principle is to increase the investment flows between Indonesia and China
The Urgency of Implementing Exhausion of Local Remedies In Investment Dispute Settlement Regarding Mining Licenses In Indonesia Adiza, Salza Fadila; Amalia, Prita; Agusman, Damos Dumoli
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 9 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v9i1.9294

Abstract

The exhaustion of local remedies (ELR) is a principle viewed as an exception rather than a rule in international investment law. Hence, it tends to be forgotten, and Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is preferable in resolving disputes concerning mining licenses. However, this has proven detrimental to Indonesia as a developing country. This research aims to analyze ELR implementation in international investment law and the urgency of implementing ELR for Indonesia as a developing country. This research uses normative and comparative juridical methods to find that ELR remains an important principle despite being generally waived and that there is an urgency for Indonesia as a developing country to implement ELR to (1) reassert sovereignty; (2) minimize financial loss; (3) improve domestic adjudication and strengthen rule of law. Implementing ELR can be done through BITs by referring to India and Argentina as models. An amendment to domestic law and regulation is also needed to ensure the enforceability of ELR in Indonesia.
Shareholders' Claim for Reflective Loss in International Investment Agreement through ISDS Arbitration Practice Belaputri, Addyana; Agusman, Damos Dumoli; Amalia, Prita
Lentera Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Human Rights and Economy in the Global South
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v10i2.39534

Abstract

Shareholders’ claim for reflective loss appears to be commonly accepted by the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) tribunals. Several international investment agreements (IIAs) have construed the condition of losses or damage under IIA to address the shareholder reflective loss (SRL) issue. Nonetheless, through the ISDS decision, the interpretation appears to be disparate. This article will aim to analyze the status of SRL in IIA through conditions of losses or damages as investment dispute characteristics and IIA text formulation to limit such conditions in addressing SRL issues through juridical normative and comparative study with a descriptive-analytical characteristic. Foreign direct investment regimes driven by the IIA show how important the IIA’s role is in providing adequate protection of investment including dispute mechanisms set through. The author will use the juridical and comparative methods by reviewing the existing statutory and case laws. The condition of loss or damage under IIA also appears to cover SRL. The limitation through the scope of allowed claims regarding whose losses, have been interpreted by several tribunals to limit a direct claim for SRL. However, the interpretation seems to be inconsistent with the other tribunals. An explicit text formulation and applying the loss-based general rule into IIA will then help to address consistent and genuine outputs of the applicable rule to limit the condition of losses or damage pertaining to the claim for SRL. In conclusion, the condition of losses or damage led the tribunal to allow the claim for SRL, yet through a limitation of the condition, the claim for SRL will be construed with specific requirements and procedures to avoid intersectoral issues. State parties in negotiating IIA are suggested to consider limiting the condition of losses or damage by adopting text formulation that led the ISDS tribunal’s interpretation to a genuine meaning of the applicability rule which the parties intended to, specifically, regarding investor’s right to claim SRL. Thus, the risk of harm that the host state suffers will be avoided.Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment, International Investment, International Law.
Legal Recognition Of Online Arbitration In Indonesia Related With China International Economic And Trade Arbitration Commission Online Arbitration Rules (Cietac Oar) Dewanto, Jagad Putra; Amalia, Prita; Budhijanto, Danrivanto
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 9, No 2 (2024): July-December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v9i2.20092

Abstract

The development of electronic commerce has opened up the possibility of disputes among cross-border traders. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is one emerging form of dispute resolution adopted by China through the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC). While Indonesia has regulations such as Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and BANI Rules 2022 governing the electronic correspondence process of dispute resolution, ODR is not explicitly addressed. This research examines the legal recognition of ODR in Indonesia and explores the urgency of establishing ODR institutions with reference to CIETAC. The research findings indicate that Indonesia has not explicitly recognized ODR, signifying the urgent need to establish ODR platforms and revise arbitration regulations and dispute resolution in Indonesia. China's experience in recognizing ODR through the establishment of platforms and regulatory updates in its arbitration regime can serve as guidance for Indonesia in the future
Pengolahan Minuman Berkhasiat dari Tanaman Obat Keluarga (Toga) untuk Peningkatan Kesehatan dan Keterampilan Bisnis di Desa Denggungan, Boyolali Ramadhan, Ana Noviana; Qolby, Fatihatul; Faradina, Tazky Aulia; Putri, Hanan Aliya; Amalia, Prita; Maulanisa, Hasna Fitri; Hayati, Aisyah Nur; Irawan, Fery; Astuti, Violi Maulidya Charlieans Ning; Aziz, Wahyu Rizkika; Suswardany, Dwi Linna
Community: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 01 (2023): MARET
Publisher : Academia Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57060/community.v3i01.86

Abstract

Tanaman Obat Keluarga (TOGA), also known as live medicinal plants, are plants planted in the home yard. Based on data from the 2022 Boyolali Regency Health Profile, the prevalence of sufferers of degenerative diseases such as hypertension in Boyolali Regency is 38.63% or 199,370 people. Meanwhile, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was 2.2% or 18,325 people. This service is carried out with the aim of building and implementing community habits in consuming healthy drinks made from TOGA spices in order to prevent degenerative diseases in society. This activity takes place in several activity stages, namely 1) Preparation stage, 2) Implementation stage which consists of material socialization, product demonstrations, cooking practices and business materials, 3) Evaluation. It is hoped that the sustainability of this program can be carried out by utilizing home gardens as land for planting TOGA, so that the use of TOGA for health can be carried out sustainably and have an impact on the socio-economic aspects of the community.
MODEL REGULATION OF THIRD-PARTY FUNDING IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Kanris, Jesslyn; Amalia, Prita
Transnational Business Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): TRANSNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL, Volume 1, Number 1, February 2020
Publisher : Department of Transnational Business Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe emerging practice of third-party funding provides an answer for the party whose rights has been breached but are financially constrained to bring forth its claims to an investment arbitration. However, the practice of third-party funding does not always run smoothly according to its optimistic expectations and noble goals. The lack of concrete regulations regarding its practice imposes several issues concerning its involvement in investment arbitration. By using normative legal and case analysis approach, this paper analyses legal doctrines and principles in investment arbitration law and their implementations in the community through comparative cases. The research uses a descriptive analytical method which describes the applicable legal regulations correlated with legal theories and their implementation in the research object. The research was conducted by finding secondary data using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research show that the regulations regarding the practice of third-party funding in addition to provide access to justice for financially constrained parties is also required to provide answers to concerns raised by its involvement in investment arbitration. The action that can be done by the Indonesian government to solve the aforementioned problem is to issue a specific international arbitration law which includes the regulations regarding the practice of third-party funding.Keywords: Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration, Indonesian Arbitration Law, Model Implementation of Indonesian International Arbitration Law.
Co-Authors Adiza, Salza Fadila Akbar, Amrul An An Chandrawulan Anhar Fauzan Priyono Anindita, Sashia Diandra Astuti, Violi Maulidya Charlieans Ning Aziz, Wahyu Rizkika Belaputri, Addyana Chandrawulan, An-An, Prof. Damos Dumoli Agusman Danrivanto Budhijanto Dewanto, Jagad Putra Dwi Linna Suswardany Faradina, Tazky Aulia Hayati, Aisyah Nur Huala Adolf Inzaghi, Rafly Nauval IRAWAN, FERY Isis Ikhwansyah Jonathan Matthew Kanris, Jesslyn Karami, Ahmad Adib Kurdi Kurdi Labib Wajdi, Muhammad Laksono, Wahyu Agung Leonard, Jessica Lingkanaya, Jovanka Makmun, M. Lazuardy Thariq Maulanisa, Hasna Fitri Nurzaman, Adi Nurzaman, R. Adi Owen, Patrick Pamungkas, Eksa Purba, Tesalonika Putri Pinuram Rambe Purnama Trisnamansyah Putri, Hanan Aliya Putri, Resha Roshana Qolby, Fatihatul Ramadhan, Ana Noviana Sinta Dewi Rosadi Suhendra, Hartono Syukri Syukri Velly, Nicholas Wardhana, Yuki Mahardhito Adhitya Wawan Hermawan Yogi Suprayogi Sugandi Yudi Azis