Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An-Nuha : Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya Dan Sosial Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Jurnal Ilmiah Religiosity Entity Humanity (JIREH)
Alfirdaus, Rasya'
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Falsifikasi Popper dan Relevansinya pada Karakteristik Pembelajaran Mahasiswa; Andragogi dan Budaya Akademik Alfirdaus, Rasya'; Dinayah, Saffana Zahro; Ulhak, Romi Dhia; Winarto, Winarto
An-Nuha : Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya dan Sosial Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): July
Publisher : LP2M Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36835/annuha.v11i1.612

Abstract

Philosophy is an integral part of science and is considered its parent. Philosophy and science have a close relationship, especially in the scientific context. The philosophy of science, with the framework of scientific theory, plays a role as a supporter of scholarly and scientific aspects and serves as the theoretical foundation in academic activities. Popper, a renowned philosopher, contributed the concept of falsification, emphasizing experimentation and criticism of scientific theories for the advancement of knowledge. In line with the goal of falsification, the progress and development of science are inevitable and need to be built. However, social facts indicate that scholarly discussion in student lectures is perceived as lacking vitality. The critical analytical attitude of students seems dormant. This issue diminishes the essence of andragogy and academic culture, which are essential characteristics of student education. Therefore, this article aims to address this problem by explaining and analyzing the learning process of students that prioritizes andragogy and academic culture in the context of their relevance to Popper's falsification concept. Thus, by understanding the points of relevance among these elements, the application of falsification can be better comprehended and implemented to achieve progress and development in scientific knowledge. In this literature-based article using a qualitative descriptive approach, the research findings conclude that there is a focal point on the development of students' critical reasoning in the interconnectedness of Popper's falsification, andragogy, and academic culture.Top of Form
Makna Qaşd as-Sabīl dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis Semantik Toshihiko Izutsu Alfirdaus, Rasya'; Ichwan, Moh. Nor; Pratama, Muhammad Yusuf
Jurnal Ilmiah Religiosity Entity Humanity (JIREH) Vol 7 No 2 (2025): This issue ongoing for Publication
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Injili dan Kejuruan (STTIK) Kupang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37364/jireh.v7i2.458

Abstract

This study aims to examine the interconnection of these meanings as a unified semantic structure using Toshihiko Izutsu’s Qur’anic semantic approach. This qualitative library research gathers data from tafsir works, Arabic dictionaries, and literature related to Izutsu’s semantic theory. The findings reveal that the basic meaning of qaşd as-sabīl is “the intended purpose of a path,” which, in its semantic relations, may refer to the straight path, salvation, guidance, Islamic law, and others. Historically, the meaning evolved from a general context (pre-Qur’anic), to more theological and specific (Qur’anic), and then to interpretive and contextual meanings (post-Qur’anic). The worldview behind this term shifted from general life purposes to the mission of conveying Islamic teachings. The diversity of interpretations is due to a structured relationship between its core meaning and its relational meanings shaped by semantic networks, historical context, and worldview constructions. Therefore, Izutsu’s semantic approach proves effective in revealing the complex and profound dimensions of qaşd as-sabīl in the Qur’an.
Analisis Kritis Kritik Al-Dzahabi terhadap Tafsir Al-Kasysyaf terhadap Q.S. an-Nisa’: 164 Alfirdaus, Rasya'; Qothrunnada AS, Aliyya; Sihabudin, M.
Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Vol 21 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/JSQ.21.2.4

Abstract

The development of interpretation from era to era has given rise to sectarianism, absolutism, and blind fanaticism in interpretation. This is highly risky and has excellent potential to become a deviation in interpretation, thus giving rise to the study of critical interpretation. In this context, the Tafsir al-Kasysyaf, known for the intense subjectivity of its interpreter, is particularly susceptible to absolutism and blind fanaticism, which are closer to deviations in interpretation. Therefore, it is worthy of critical study. Al-Dzahabi, an expert in critical interpretation, outlines the critical research here. The object of study focuses on Q.S. al-Nisa' verse 164 because it discusses the nature of Allah's speech that the Mu'tazilah opposes, thus providing an overview of how the mufassir defends the theology he adheres to regarding this verse. Using library research and descriptive analysis methods, this research article aims to examine al-Dzahabi's criticism based on the focus of the study on the interpretation of Q.S. al-Nisa' verse 164 in al-Kasysyaf — whether it is included in al-dakhil or not, and about the forms of al-dakhil that contradict al-ashil. This study found that az-Zamakhsyari's interpretation of the verse is categorised as al-dakhil in the form of riwayat and raiso or ijtihad. Further research recommendations include expanding the analysis to other interpretations influenced by theological tendencies and developing a methodology of interpretation criticism as a scientific evaluation tool. This study encourages academics and exegesis practitioners to apply an objective, critical approach to maintain validity and avoid errors in understanding the Quran.
Co-Authors Dinayah, Saffana Zahro Ichwan, Moh. Nor Pratama, Muhammad Yusuf Qothrunnada AS, Aliyya Sihabudin, M. Ulhak, Romi Dhia Winarto Winarto