Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ta'dib: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan KOLOKIUM: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah AL MA'ARIEF : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SOSIAL DAN BUDAYA Jurnal AL-Muta`aliyah : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah
Santos, Mariano Dos
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of history subject teaching modules in high school: A review based on the Merdeka Curriculum Mulyani, Fini Fajri; Syahriani, Fadilla; Santos, Mariano Dos
AL MA'ARIEF : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Al Ma'arief: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Program Studi Tadris IPS Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/almaarief.v6i1.8822

Abstract

This research aims to analyze teaching modules that have been developed by history teachers in terms of the Merdeka Curriculum policy by paying attention to aspects of the completeness and systematics of teaching modules, and aspects of the content of teaching modules. The method used in this research uses descriptive qualitative methods. The data collection technique only uses documentation techniques in the form of teaching modules for history teachers at SMAN 1 Padang and SMAN 1 Ranah Pasisia. The data analysis technique uses techniques developed by Habermas, namely data reduction, data presentation, and verification or conclusion. The research results show that the teaching modules from both schools meet the Ministry of Education and Culture's curriculum standards and are by Ministry of Education and Culture Decree No. 008/H/KR/2022. Teachers at both schools succeeded in integrating historical thinking skills, historical awareness, and historical research into learning. However, there are differences in the development of practical historical skills, the local material included, and the development of summative assessments. This analysis shows variations in the approach, completeness, and presentation of material in history teaching modules in the two schools. Evaluation of teaching module components, skills development, the material contained, and formative and summative assessments are needed to improve the quality of history learning in both schools. The implications of this research show that there are variations in the approach, completeness, and presentation of materials in the history teaching modules in both schools.
Analisis Generalizabilitas Dua Faset dalam Penilaian Ujian Skripsi di IAI Nurul Hakim Kediri Lombok Barat Ahmad, Ahmad; Santos, Mariano Dos
Jurnal al Muta'aliyah: Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Jurnal AL-Muta`aliyah
Publisher : LP2M STAI Darul Kamal NW Kembang Kerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51700/mutaaliyah.v5i2.1162

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the consistency and fairness of undergraduate thesis assessments at IAI Nurul Hakim Kediri, West Lombok, using Generalizability Theory (G-Theory). Data were collected from the assessments of 13 students by three examiners using four standardized evaluation criteria. Analysis using the EduG software revealed that the largest source of error stemmed from the interaction among persons, raters, and criteria (PRQ). The generalizability coefficient of 0.93 indicates excellent reliability of the assessment instrument. To enhance fairness, efforts should be made to reduce variability in facet interactions. Simulations showed that increasing the number of raters and criteria could improve reliability. While Option 5 yielded the most optimal results, Options 3 and 4 are also worth considering as they offer a balance between reliability and resource efficiency. This study underscores the importance of well-designed assessment systems to ensure fair and consistent undergraduate thesis evaluations.
Analisis Generalizabilitas Dua Faset dalam Penilaian Ujian Skripsi di IAI Nurul Hakim Kediri Lombok Barat Ahmad, Ahmad; Santos, Mariano Dos
Jurnal al Muta'aliyah: Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Jurnal AL-Muta`aliyah
Publisher : LP2M STAI Darul Kamal NW Kembang Kerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the consistency and fairness of undergraduate thesis assessments at IAI Nurul Hakim Kediri, West Lombok, using Generalizability Theory (G-Theory). Data were collected from the assessments of 13 students by three examiners using four standardized evaluation criteria. Analysis using the EduG software revealed that the largest source of error stemmed from the interaction among persons, raters, and criteria (PRQ). The generalizability coefficient of 0.93 indicates excellent reliability of the assessment instrument. To enhance fairness, efforts should be made to reduce variability in facet interactions. Simulations showed that increasing the number of raters and criteria could improve reliability. While Option 5 yielded the most optimal results, Options 3 and 4 are also worth considering as they offer a balance between reliability and resource efficiency. This study underscores the importance of well-designed assessment systems to ensure fair and consistent undergraduate thesis evaluations.
Validity of Adult Learning Motivation Measurement Instruments: A Psychometric Analysis Ahmad, Ahmad; Santos, Mariano Dos; Rashid, Salman
KOLOKIUM Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah Vol 13, No 2 (2025): Kolokium: Publishing October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kolokium.v13i2.1152

Abstract

Learning motivation is an important factor in the success of adult education, both in non-formal programs, training, and community development. However, many existing motivation measurement instruments still come from formal education adaptation and have not gone through adequate psychometric tests. This study aims to analyze the validity of the instrument for measuring adult learning motivation. The method used was a quantitative survey involving 72 respondents aged 20-50 years from non-formal education and training programs in Central Lombok and West Lombok Regencies. The instrument consists of 25 statements with a five-point Likert scale. The validity of the content was tested using Aiken's V, while the validity of the construct was analyzed by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) through the MSA test and Bartlett's Test using the R studio application. The results of the study showed that most of the items had medium to high category content validity. MSA values range from 0.64–0.88 and the Bartlett test yields χ² = 1369.036; df = 300; p < 0.001 which confirms the feasibility of the data. The EFA analysis found five factors with an eigenvalue of > 1, but four main factors were maintained with a total variance of 60.4%. These findings confirm that the instrument has adequate construct validity and can be used in adult education evaluation.
Pengembangan Instrumen Berpikir Kritis Matematis Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Putri, Hafiziani Eka; Fitri, Rizka Malfiana; Rahayu, Teten Ginanjar; Nurussama, Alfiana; Hikmatunisa, Nenden Permas; Santos, Mariano Dos
Al-TA'DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan Vol. 19 No. 2 (2026): In-Press
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/atdbwv19i2.14498

Abstract

Mathematical Critical Thinking (MCT) is a key 21st-century competency, yet elementary students’ MCT skills remain underdeveloped, partly due to the lack of age-appropriate assessment instruments. Existing instruments primarily target secondary and higher education and inadequately represent critical thinking indicators in elementary mathematics. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of an MCT instrument on integer addition and subtraction for elementary students. Using a Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model, the instrument was tested on 17 third-grade students at an elementary school in Purwakarta through purposive sampling. Nine essay items were designed based on six indicators: interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation. The results showed a reliability coefficient of 0.88, with item difficulty ranging from easy to moderate and good discrimination indices. Five items met validity criteria and were deemed suitable for assessing elementary students’ mathematical critical thinking skills.
Co-Authors Ahmad Ahmad Fitri, Rizka Malfiana Hafiziani Eka Putri, Hafiziani Eka Hikmatunisa, Nenden Permas Mulyani, Fini Fajri Nurussama, Alfiana Rahayu, Teten Ginanjar Rashid, Salman Syahriani, Fadilla