Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Cendekia: Journal of Law, Social and Humanities
Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role of Communication in Health Services in Indonesia Cut Khairunnisa; masriadi, masriadi; Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir; Muhammad Hatta; Nurarafah
Cendekia : Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Cendekia : Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pusat Studi Sosial dan Humaniora [LPS2H]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8115983

Abstract

In the principle of informed consent, doctors were obliged to establish communication with patients before carrying out medical treatments. Information from the doctor became a guideline or consideration for patients in making a choice (freedom to choose) and gave approval to the doctor to carry out medical action to them. The obligation of doctors to effectively communicate has been regulated in Article 35 and Article 45 of Law No. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and further strengthened by Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia No. 290/ Menkes/ Per/ III/ 2008 concerning Approval of Medical Measures. The effectiveness of communication in health services was an act of caution in medical treatments. Before the medical treatment was carried out, the patient should already knew about the disease, the chances of healing, the risk of medical treatment and the patients were also given alternative methods of other treatments so that the patients has information about the illness and therapy that doctors would do. If communication between patients and doctors is effective, it could prevent medical malpractice.
Expert Witness against the Crime of Medical Malpractice in Indonesia Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir; Muhammad Hatta; Khairunnisa, Cut; Yati Nurhayati
Cendekia : Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Cendekia : Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pusat Studi Sosial dan Humaniora [LPS2H]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10463968

Abstract

In the legal aspect, the position and role of the doctor as an expert witness is very important. Their expert testimony even plays major consideration in the decision of the judges. However, it is not easy to invite doctors as expert witnesses if the suspects are their colleagues. In addition, the doctor, the expert witness, would give less objective testimony in court to protect their colleagues. Also, it is very rare that expert witness points out different medical measures carried out by the suspects. Proof mechanism by using a doctor as an expert witness is a flaw in law enforcement in cases of medical malpractice. Globally, there are some countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Switzerland that have introduced reversed burden proof systems.
Co-Authors Cut Khairunnisa Masriadi, Masriadi Muhammad Hatta Nurarafah Yati Nurhayati