Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Building a Model for Refugee Rights Fulfillment: Community Collaboration at Cisarua Refugee Learning Centre in the Context of International Law Arifin, Ridwan; Abidah , Shofriya Qonitatin; Qoiri, Mutmainah Nur; Nte , Ngboawaji Daniel; Ezzerouali, Souad; Chhachhar , Varun
Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i2.33111

Abstract

This study explores the model of fulfilling refugee rights through community collaboration, with a specific focus on the Cisarua Refugee Learning Centre (CRLC) in Indonesia. Refugees, as one of the most vulnerable groups globally, often face significant challenges in accessing their basic rights, including education, healthcare, and legal protection. The research analyzes how community-based initiatives, especially through the CRLC, contribute to the realization of refugee rights in the context of international law, such as the 1951 Refugee Convention. This study emphasizes the importance of collaboration between refugees, local communities, and international organizations in fostering an inclusive environment for refugees to access essential services. By examining the CRLC's efforts in providing education, skills, and advocacy for refugees, this paper proposes a sustainable model for refugee rights fulfillment that aligns with international legal standards.
The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna; Rahmawati, Ema; Suparman, Eman; Arifin, Ridwan; Ezzerouali, Souad
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873

Abstract

In the digital age, the use of electronic evidence in civil disputes has become increasingly common. However, judges often face significant challenges in accepting and evaluating electronic evidence due to concerns about its authenticity, integrity, and relevance. This paper examines the factors contributing to judicial doubts regarding electronic evidence in Indonesian civil litigation and explores the implications of such doubts on the resolution of legal disputes. Drawing on case law, legal theory, and practical challenges, the paper identifies key issues such as the ease of manipulation, lack of standardized procedures for collecting and preserving digital evidence, and the limited understanding of technology among many judges. These factors create a significant barrier to the effective use of electronic evidence in court, leading to delays, case dismissals, or unjust outcomes. The paper also discusses potential solutions to overcome these challenges, including the need for clearer legal frameworks, the role of forensic digital experts, and judicial education in information technology. By addressing these concerns, this paper aims to highlight the critical importance of building trust in electronic evidence, ensuring its proper use in civil dispute resolution, and promoting a more efficient and fair legal process. Ultimately, the study proposes strategies to strengthen the role of electronic evidence in Indonesian civil law while maintaining judicial integrity and ensuring the protection of all parties involved.
Negotiating Customary Law and Fiqh Norms: The Transformation of the Mepahukh Tradition in the Indigenous Marriage Practices of the Alas People in Southeast Aceh Muhammad Adib Alfarisi; Raihan Putri; Dina Fadhila; Ezzerouali, Souad
Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Socio-Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Socio-Legal Studies
Publisher : Elkuator Research and Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/ijssls.1.1.9

Abstract

Custom-based matchmaking practices in Muslim communities often experience tension between cultural authority and religious normative frameworks. However, comprehensive studies exploring the negotiation between local traditions and fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) norms in contemporary contexts remain limited. This article examines the transformation of mepahukh, a customary courtship ritual performed during wedding celebrations among the Alas people in Southeast Aceh, through the lens of negotiation between customary law and fiqh-oriented norms. Utilizing a socio-legal approach and a fieldwork-based research design, this study draws on primary data collected through semi-structured interviews with eight key informants, including a village head, customary leaders, local religious authorities, and young people, as well as non-participant observation of the ritual’s implementation. The findings reveal that while mepahukh continues to function as a social mechanism for strengthening marital alliances and reproducing ethnic identity, it is increasingly subject to normative scrutiny due to negative perceptions of ikhtilāṭ (unsupervised interaction between non-maḥram men and women) and concerns regarding moral permissiveness. In response to growing criticism from religious authorities, the Alas community has adopted adaptive strategies, including family deliberations, procedural restrictions, and enhanced roles for customary and religious leaders. This article argues that mepahukh is not a static cultural artifact but a dynamic space for value negotiation within the inter-legalities between customary and Islamic law. The sustainability of this tradition depends on the community’s ability to reformulate its practices in ways that are ethical, context-sensitive, and aligned with both cultural norms and religious principles. [Praktik perjodohan berbasis adat dalam masyarakat muslim kerap menghadapi ketegangan antara otoritas kultural dan kerangka normatif agama. Namun demikian, kajian komprehensif yang secara mendalam mengeksplorasi dinamika negosiasi antara tradisi lokal dan norma fikih dalam konteks kontemporer masih relatif terbatas. Artikel ini menganalisis transformasi tradisi mepahukh—sebuah ritus perjodohan adat yang dilaksanakan pada malam hari dalam rangkaian pesta perkawinan masyarakat Alas di Aceh Tenggara—dalam kerangka negosiasi antara hukum adat dan norma-norma fikih. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosio-legal dan desain penelitian berbasis lapangan, artikel ini mengandalkan data primer dari wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan delapan informan kunci, yang terdiri atas kepala desa, tokoh adat, otoritas keagamaan, dan pemuda-pemudi yang terlibat, serta observasi non-partisipatif terhadap pelaksanaan tradisi tersebut. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa meskipun mepahukh tetap berfungsi sebagai mekanisme sosial untuk membentuk aliansi pernikahan dan mereproduksi identitas etnik, praktik ini semakin mendapat tekanan normatif akibat persepsi negatif terhadap ikhtilāṭ (interaksi bebas antara laki-laki dan perempuan non-mahram) dan kekhawatiran atas kemerosotan moral. Merespons kritik dari kalangan tokoh agama, komunitas Alas menunjukkan kapasitas adaptif melalui musyawarah keluarga, pembatasan teknis, serta penguatan peran tokoh adat dan agama. Artikel ini berargumentasi bahwa mepahukh bukanlah artefak budaya yang statis, melainkan ruang negosiasi nilai yang berlangsung dalam konteks interlegalitas antara hukum adat dan norma fikih. Keberlanjutan tradisi ini bergantung pada kapasitas komunitas untuk mereformulasi praktiknya secara etis, kontekstual, dan selaras dengan prinsip budaya maupun agama.]
Iron Shadows Behind the Smile of Power: Torture Under the New Order Indonesia Amrullah, Said; Ezzerouali, Souad; Ahmad, Miftahuddin
Indonesia Discourse Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January-June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/indi.v1i1.22651

Abstract

This study critically examines the pervasive and systematic use of torture during Indonesia's New Order regime (1966-1998). This research underscores the urgent need to address the historical and ongoing implications of state-sponsored violence in Indonesia. Despite Indonesia’s transition to a democratic system, the legacies of repression and torture continue to shape the country’s political and social landscape. The study analyzes the mechanisms of torture under the New Order, focusing on the state's efforts to silence dissent, control political opposition, and maintain power through fear. Through an examination of archival materials, testimonies from victims, and interviews with human rights activists, this research illuminates the institutionalized practices of torture employed by the Indonesian military and police, often justified under the guise of national security and anti-communism. The work also highlights the impact of these practices on both individual lives and the broader society, contributing to a climate of fear that has persisted even after the regime’s downfall. This research makes a significant contribution by offering a comprehensive analysis of torture's role in reinforcing the power structures of the New Order, revealing the psychological and social costs of authoritarian rule. Furthermore, it emphasizes the urgent need for transitional justice and accountability mechanisms to address the crimes of the past. By providing a historical framework, the study advocates for a broader understanding of Indonesia’s political transformation, shedding light on the continuing struggle for justice and human rights in the post-New Order era.