Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KORPORASI SEBAGAI SUBJEK HUKUM Busri, Ihsan; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Suar, Aprima
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Vol. 7 No. 1 Edisi 2 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i1.2158

Abstract

Abstract: Money laundering carried out by corporations is an illegal act that involves a series of activities to disguise the origin of funds obtained from criminal activities, with the aim of making the funds appear legitimate and legal. Corporations in money laundering crimes are involved as entities that facilitate the money laundering process, either through business transactions, transfer of assets, or the use of non-transparent financial structures. This research examines how corporations can be responsible for criminal acts of money laundering according to Law no. 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering (UU TPPU), as well as legal accountability policies for the corporations involved. The research method used is normative legal research, which focuses on analyzing legal norms related to corporate responsibility in money laundering crimes. The research results show that in the context of Indonesian law, corporations are recognized as legal subjects that can be held responsible for criminal acts of money laundering. Based on the TPPU Law, corporations can not only be made subject to responsibility for criminal acts of money laundering committed by individuals acting on behalf of or for the interests of the corporation, but can also be imposed on individuals whether they are legal entities or non-legal entities.Keywords: Corporations, Money Laundering Crimes and Criminal Responsibility
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KORPORASI DALAM PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN Sofhan, Dedi; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Suar, Aprima
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Vol. 7 No. 1 Edisi 2 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i1.2163

Abstract

Abstract: This research examines corporate criminal liability for environmental pollution, with a focus on the legal implications and factors that cause violations by corporations. The method used in this research is normative legal research, which analyzes applicable legal norms, legal principles, and doctrines related to law enforcement against corporations that commit pollution. The research results show that corporations can be held responsible for environmental pollution through criminal law mechanisms. Corporations are often involved in environmental violations due to economic motivation to gain quick profits, a moral crisis in organizational culture, weak supervision and law enforcement, and pressure to compete in the market. However, law enforcement against corporations involved in environmental crimes still faces many challenges, including the inability of the legal system to effectively accommodate corporate criminal liability. For this reason, a firm approach that includes the application of additional criminal sanctions and repair of environmental damage needs to be strengthened.Keywords: Environmental Pollution, Criminal and Corporate Liability. 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KEJAHATAN KORPORASI DALAM PEMBAYARAN UANG PESANGON AKIBAT PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA Kabes, Irianto; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Suar, Aprima
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 No 3 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v6i3.2734

Abstract

Abstract: Of the total 536 collective agreements related to layoffs in 2019, only 147 agreements, which is equivalent to around 27 percent, provided layoff compensation in accordance with labor regulations. On the other hand, 384 agreements, or around 73 percent, did not meet the provisions of the applicable law in terms of layoff compensation payments. This research aims to identify corporate responsibility in terms of severance pay due to layoffs., This research carried out using a normative and descriptive approach, using secondary data for qualitative analysis. Deductive logic methods are applied to reach conclusions. with the problem formulation, what is the responsibility for corporate crime in the payment of severance pay due to termination of employment? Research results show that Termination of Employment (PHK) is a termination of the employment relationship between a company and employees which can occur for various reasons, including the employer's initiative, the wishes of workers, legal regulations, or decisions of the Industrial Relations Court (PHI). Layoffs require employers to provide compensation in the form of severance pay, gratuity pay, and compensation for rights in accordance with the provisions. Types of layoffs include changes in company status, efficiency, liquidation, force majeure, bankruptcy, violation of provisions, retirement, and death or permanent disability. Corporations that do not fulfill their severance pay obligations can be subject to criminal sanctions according to various theories of corporate responsibility including strict liability, vicarious liability, direct corporate criminal liability, aggregation theory, and corporate culture model.Keywords: Corporations, Employment, Crime
PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA Sukrianto, Andi; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Suar, Aprima
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 No 3 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v6i3.2735

Abstract

Abstract: Corporate accountability in business competition crimes in Indonesia is one of the important aspects in the effort to create a healthy and fair business competition climate. corporations or business entities can act as legal subjects that engage in anti-competitive actions detrimental to public interests, such as cartel monopoly practices or abuse of dominant positions. In the context of law in Indonesia, this business competition crime is regulated by various regulations, especially in. (Law No. 5 of 1999) This research method is used as a way to examine and analyze research problems, with the type of legal research used being normative legal research. descriptive in nature by adopting a regulatory approach (statute approach). In the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016, Article 4, paragraph (1) states that corporations can be held accountable in accordance with corporate criminal provisions in the law governing corporations. If a corporation is proven to have committed an offense, both administrative and criminal sanctions can be imposed, with the aim of preventing anti-competitive behavior and protecting consumers and other business actors.Keywords: corporate accountability in criminal offenses.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN INVESTASI SKEMA PIRAMIDA DI PASAR MODAL Maulana, Wahyu; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Suar, Aprima
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 No 3 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v6i3.2640

Abstract

Abstract: Investment fraud through pyramid schemes in the capital market has become an increasingly pressing issue as public interest in investments, especially in the form of cryptocurrency, rises. This study aims to examine the legal regulations related to investment fraud crimes and the application of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators. First, legal regulations in Indonesia regarding investment fraud, particularly pyramid schemes, still face serious challenges despite the existence of regulations such as the Capital Market Law and Bappebti Regulation No. 7 of 2020. These fraudulent practices, often caused by a lack of investor understanding of investment risks, are regulated under Article 378 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP). Second, the enforcement of law against these fraud perpetrators is crucial for maintaining public trust and market stability. The applicable criminal sanctions include a maximum prison sentence of 1 year and 4 months for individuals, as well as fines or business closures for legal entities, according to the provisions of the KUHP. Although a legal framework exists, challenges in proving cases and the complexities of the technology used in pyramid schemes remain obstacles to law enforcement. This study provides a better understanding of the challenges in enforcing laws against investment fraud in pyramid schemes in the capital market and emphasizes the need for increased education for investors.Keywords: Law enforcement, criminal acts, investment fraud, pyramid schemes, capital market.
SANKSI YANG DAPAT DI KENAKAN TERHADAP KORPORASI YANG TERLIBAT PIDANA Sopian, Muhamad; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Suar, Aprima
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 No 3 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v6i3.1578

Abstract

Abstract: As corporations grow increasingly rapidly in the field of economic activity, what is called corporate crime emerges. Corporate crime is an Extra Ordinary Crime. In fact, the impact is not just a momentary loss, but has an impact for a very long time. Therefore, Muladi believes that the idea of punishing corporations through criminal policies is becoming increasingly stronger and important. The recognition of corporations as subjects of criminal law means that corporations can be held accountable. This also means that in both academic and practitioner circles, special crimes called corporate crimes are considered crimes whose perpetrators (corporations) can be held accountable under criminal law. Discussing the problems in this scientific work assignment, the author tries to conduct a scientific analysis using the theory of punishment, namely that a person will not be punished if there is no mistake. Corporate criminal liability cannot be separated from the two subjects of criminal law in corporate crimes, namely the person as manager and the corporation itself. So that in relation to the position of the corporation and the nature of corporate criminal liability in corporate crimes, there are three models of corporate criminal liability, namely the management as the creator and the manager who is responsible, the corporation as the maker and the management are responsible, the corporation as the maker and also the responsible. Prevention of corporate crime can be done in the following ways. The government and legal authorities must provide strict supervision to legal entities and take firm action if corporate crime occurs. Strict supervision/control will narrow the space for a legal entity to commit violations. The role and participation of the community in monitoring violations and crimes committed by corporations and cooperation from various parties, namely the government, law enforcement officials and the community to prevent corporate crimes in monitoring every activity of a corporation.Keywords: Sanctions, Imposed on Corporations, Involved in Crime.
Personal Data Protection According to the Implemented Law in Indonesia and Japan Widjajanti, Ermania; Hummerson, Andi Widiatno; Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna; Alfianto, Dwi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4340

Abstract

The rapid development of technology creates various new things that can make human life easier, one of which is the cyber world which involves the internet. The presence of the cyber world brings many benefits to human life, with cyber, humans can do various things without being limited by distance and time. However, apart from bringing many positive things, the presence of the cyber world certainly creates new opportunities for crime, one of the threats in the cyber world is personal data. Indonesia and Japan, two countries that have significant economic and technological development in the Asian region, are not immune from the threat of personal data theft. Although both have different legal and cultural frameworks, both strive to protect the personal data of their citizens from increasingly complex cyber threats. In this way, a comparison will be made regarding the crime of personal data theft between Indonesia and Japan starting from the cultural history of respecting personal data in each country, the birth of regulations in each country, the criminal law system in each country, and also the regulations governing and has criminal sanctions in each country. The methodology used in this writing is a normative research. It is concluded that theft of personal data poses a significant challenge in the digital era, causing identity fraud, financial loss, and privacy violations. Indonesia and Japan, both Asian nations, have varying legal frameworks but both strive to protect citizens' data from cyber threats. Indonesia's regulations, passed in 2008, cover information and electronic transactions, intellectual property rights, and protection. Japan, on the other hand, has been addressing data protection since 2000, with regulations like APPI, My Number Act, and Act on Prohibition of Unauthorized Computer Access.