Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.126
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences Jurnal Mirai Management Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat PEMA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Research Journal on Education Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies Dahzain Nur
Nur'aini, Intan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies

 1 
Language in conflict debates: Impoliteness strategies in the open to debate youtube channel ‘were Israel’s actions in the Gaza war justified?’ Nur'aini, Intan; Akmal, Hilmi
Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Dec 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Mitra Persada Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58881/jlps.v4i3.136

Abstract

This study analyzes the strategies of impoliteness in the debate ‘Were Israel’s Actions in the Gaza War Justified?’ on the Open to Debate YouTube channel. Using Jonathan Culpeper’s theory of impoliteness, this research aims to identify and analyze the impoliteness strategies employed by speakers and their functions in the context of conflict debates. This qualitative study utilizes documentation techniques and data cards to collect and analyze data. The results show that there are 4 instances of bald on record, 2 instances of sarcasm or mock politeness, and 1 instance of negative impoliteness, and 1 instance of positive impoliteness. Further analysis reveals that these impoliteness strategies can be categorized into two primary functions: coercive impoliteness (pressuring the opponent) and affective impoliteness (expressing strong emotions). This study also demonstrates that impoliteness in debates about conflict does not only carry negative connotations, but also can serve as a form of strong concern for defending humanity and as an effort to voice concerns for the conflict resolution. In conclusion, this study shows that the three speakers (Eylon Levy and Mehdi Hasan) employ impoliteness strategies with different objectives: Eylon Levy tends to prioritize Israel’s security, while Mehdi Hasan uses impoliteness to defend all victims, both in Palestine and Israel, and to support conflict resolution.
Co-Authors Adinda Lubis, Nurul Akmal, Hilmi Habibulloh, Muh. Haryadi - Hernas, Erika Putri Imam Much Ibnu Subroto Listiyani Siti Romlah Lubis, Nurul Adinda Maulana, Adhli Maulana, Saddam Ratna Supradewi Riansyah, Andi Saiful Bahri Sa’idy, Sa’idy Sri Wahyuni Suyanto Suyanto Tarigan, Mardinal Umi Hijriyah Zakariya, Rizki