Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sextortion Fenomena Pemerasan Seksual di Lingkungan Pendidikan Syauket, Amalia; Saimima, Ika Dewi Sartika; Simarmata, Rajanner P; Aidy, Widya Romasindah; Zainab, Nina; Prayitno, Rahadi Budi; Cabui, Cornelia Evelin
Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Vol. 22 No. 3 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi (LPPMP)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sqgp1z49

Abstract

There seems to be something different from the results of Transparency International Indonesia (TII) including sextortion or sexual extortion in the Global Corruption Barometer Asia 2020. This is extortion in the form of violence or sexual harassment. Generally a form of abuse of power. Sextortion is different from the corruption we know in a legal context. In terms of regulations and institutions, the practice of sextortion or sextortion is a case that occurs quite a lot but is not yet known in corruption eradication institutions in Indonesia. Sextortion is a new area that opens everyone's eyes to the fact that corruption is not only about money. This study uses a qualitative approach to answer how the form of legal protection for victims of sextortion is rife lately in the educational environment. The conclusions of this study indicate that the form of legal protection for victims of sextortion in the educational environment is in the form of assistance, protection and recovery of victims by strengthening the legal aspect in the form of SOPs for Handling Sexual Violence in each educational institution as well as the installation of detection devices. The novelty of this research can be used for extensive interpretation of legal findings by judges to protect victims of sextortion. And the importance of education on strong self-protection awareness, boldly rejecting or saying no.
Peran Stake Holder dalam Pemenuhan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule (BJR) Direksi BUMN Gunadi, Genta Arief; Simarmata, Rajanner P; Widiatmoko, Catur; Prayitno, Rahadi Budi
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): April 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jptam.v8i1.12400

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban Direksi BUMN dalam mengelola BUMN di Indonesia sampai saat ini masih menimbulkan kontroversi, disatu sisi Direksi BUMN dituntut untuk mencari laba dan mengembangkan kinerja bisnis perusahaan BUMN yang dipimpinnya namun disisi lain apabila dalam menjalankan roda perusahaan tersebut menimbulkan kerugian maka Tindakan tersebut mengandung resiko dianggap merugikan negara. Konsep BJR menyatakan bahwa Direksi BUMN sepanjang memenuhi prinsip itikad baik dan kehati-hatian tidak dapat dituntut bila tindakannya menimbulkan kerugian bagi BUMN.. Berdasarkan prinsip ini, direksi BUMN pembuat keputusan bisnis yang mengakibatkan kerugian bagi BUMN tidak dapat dituntut bertanggung jawab secara pribadi dengan syarat keputusan bisnis tersebut diambil berdasarkan itikad. Salah satu tahapan untuk dapat memenuhi unsur BJR tersebut adalah keterlibatan Stake holder, baik internal maupun eksternal untuk mendukung tindakan yang diambil Direksi