Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) SASI Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : SASI

 1 
Integration Between Customary Law and National Law: An Effort to Build a Pancasila Prismatic Law State Sihotang, Amri Panahatan; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip
SASI Volume 29 Issue 2, June 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i2.1304

Abstract

Introduction: This article to examine and analyze aspects of integration between national law and customary law in the context of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the enactment of the draft criminal code (RKUHP) as a law.                                                                                             Purpose of The Research: This research seeks to answer two problem formulations, namely: integration of customary law and national law in the Pancasila law state and how are efforts to organize harmonious relations between customary law and national law in the perspective of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP.Methods of Research: This study uses normative legal research methods based on authoritative legal products in the form of laws and regulations. The analysis was carried out by prioritizing the concept approach, historical approach, and statutory approach.                                                               Result of The Research: Even though customary law and national law are different in substance and character, but customary law and national law must be integrated because have important relations in relation to practice in society. Efforts to organize a harmonious relationship between customary law and national law in the perspective of the Pancasila prismatic state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP by optimizing the three year transitional provisions in the RKUHP to socialize as well as determining steps and efforts that can guarantee harmonious relations between customary law and national law.
Corporate Social Responsibility Legal Framework in Southeast Asia: Comparing Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand Anggusti, Martono; Dewi Siregar, Fitri Yanni; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip
SASI Volume 31 Issue 2, June 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2984

Abstract

Introduction: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved over time, reflecting changes in corporate thinking and practices regarding their relationships with society and the environment.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of CSR in Indonesia to compare it with CSR regulations in other Southeast Asian countries, namely Malaysia and Thailand.Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal study that emphasizes a conceptual and legislative approach.Results of the Research: The development of the concept of CSR began in the 18th century by Robert Owen, who provided facilities for employees. CSR rapidly evolved in the 20th century, with large companies in the US establishing social departments. Milton Friedman's thinking about profit as the primary goal of business and John Elkington's concept of the "triple bottom line" also influenced the development of CSR. CSR functions as the moral responsibility of companies towards society and the environment, implemented through transparency, ethics, and responsible business decisions. In Indonesia, CSR has been regulated by law since 2007, with the aim of improving the quality of life and supporting sustainable development. A comparison of CSR regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand shows that although their goals are similar, namely to encourage corporate contributions to social and environmental development, their approaches differ. Indonesia implements strict legal obligations, Malaysia combines voluntary elements with supportive regulations, while Thailand prioritizes a cultural and voluntary approach with government recognition. Thailand is recognized as the best example in the implementation of CSR in ASEAN, with a higher quality of implementation compared to other countries.
Co-Authors Amri Panahatan Sihotang Anggusti, Martono Disantara, Fradhana Putra Ermanto Fahamsyah Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar I Gede Agus Kurniawan I Made Wirya Darma Koto, Ismail Lubis, Ikhsan Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Putu Aras Samsithawrati Sari Lubis, Duma Indah Siregar, Taufik Sudarta, Gede Dicky Wahyu Putra