Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Harmonisasi dan Disparitas: Pembagian Warisan bagi anak Angkat dalam Hukum Islam dan Hukum Perdata M. Iqbal; Andina Larasati; Anisa Putri; Dewi Wulandari; Enjelita Dwi Maharani; Fahira Silva Dilla Nst; Lisa Alfira Andini; Nia Anjunita Sari Purba; Sri Muallimah; Theresia Mardiyana Tamba
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Desember: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama dan Filsafat
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrafi.v4i3.6914

Abstract

Inheritance involving adopted children often becomes a complex and controversial issue in Indonesia’s dual legal system. In Islamic law, inheritance is strictly based on blood and marital relationships; therefore, adopted children are not considered legal heirs. To address this limitation, Article 209 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) introduces the concept of a wasiat wajibah or mandatory will, allowing adopted children to receive up to one-third of the adoptive parents’ estate. In contrast, civil law treats adopted children as equivalent to biological children if the adoption is legally recognized, granting them full inheritance rights. These contrasting provisions create legal disparities and confusion within society. This study aims to explore the different legal treatments of adopted children under both systems, identify the challenges they face, and analyze efforts toward harmonization. Using a qualitative, normative-juridical approach through literature and regulatory analysis, the study finds that Islamic law restricts inheritance through gifts and wills, while civil law ensures equal rights. Challenges include legal uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations, and potential conflicts between adopted and biological heirs. Harmonization efforts are reflected in KHI provisions, legal reforms on adoption, and judicial practices seeking to balance sharia principles, social justice, and legal certainty.
Optimalisasi Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Dalam Pengembangan Minat Dan Bakat Siswa Di Man 3 Medan Agnes Novita Br Simanjorang; Andina Larasati; Arini Maulida Sitepu; Rejeki Karina Banurea; Riris Bintang; Sri Rejeky Sitohang; Santa Murni A Situmorang
Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): GJMI - JUNI
Publisher : PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v2i6.509

Abstract

Kegiatan ekstrakurikuler atau sering disingkat (Ekskul) merupakan kegiatan pembelajaran bagi siswa di luar sekolah yang mempunyai potensi besar untuk mentransformasikan siswa menjadi siswa yang kreatif, inovatif, kompeten dan berorientasi pada prestasi. Dalam pelaksanaan program ektrakurkuler dilakukan yang beriringan dengan pengawasan dan evaluasi agar kinerja program kegiatan ekstrakurikuler dan hasilnya sesuai dengan perencanaan standar ekstrakulikuler efektif yaitu tujuan dan sasaran yang jelas, perencanaan dan struktur yang baik, kesesuaian dengan minat dan bakat siswa, partisipasi aktif siswa, fasilitas dan dukungan yang memadai. dalam penelitian ini, pendekatan kualitatif digunakan dalam metode penelitian menggunakan tipe deskriptif. MAN 3 Medan memiliki program ekstrakurikuler yang dapat mendukung akreditasi sekolah. Program ekstrakurikuler yang ada di MAN 3 Medan dapat membantu minat dan bakat siswa.
Harmonisasi dan Disparitas : Pembagian Warisan bagi Anak Adopsi dalam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Adat Karo Nia Anjunita Sari Purba; Sri Hadiningrum; Parlaungan G Siahaan; Anggun Adelita; Andina Larasati; Enjelita Dwi Maharani
JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): April: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/jispendiora.v4i1.2527

Abstract

This study is entitled Harmonization and Disparity: Comparative Analysis of the Division of Inheritance for Adopted Children According to Civil Law and Karo Customary Law. The main focus of this study is to identify and analyze the differences and common ground between the national legal system in this case civil law and Karo customary law in determining inheritance rights for adopted children. In civil law, adopted children are legally recognized as having equal standing with biological children. This provision strengthens the rights of adopted children to receive inheritance from their adoptive parents. On the other hand, in the context of Karo customary law, recognition of adopted children as heirs is still limited. Generally, only male adopted children are given inheritance rights to searched property, while inheritance remains inherited by male descendants from the bloodline. The problems studied in this proposal include how the law treats adopted children in the division of inheritance according to the two legal systems, the challenges faced in realizing the inheritance rights of adopted children, and how to formulate efforts to harmonize civil law and customary law in order to create equal justice. This study uses a qualitative approach with a library research type. The results of the study indicate that there is a fundamental disparity between civil law and Karo customary law in granting inheritance rights to adopted children. Civil law stipulates that adopted children who are legally adopted through the courts have equal rights to biological children, including the right to legitieme portie. Thus, a more inclusive, adaptive legal system can be created that guarantees justice for all children without discrimination based on birth status or gender.
Dominasi Elite Lokal dalam Penetapan Prioritas Pembangunan pada Musrenbangdes di Desa Bandar Khalipa, Kabupaten Deli Serdang Agnes Novita Br Simanjorang; Andina Larasati; Mikhael Juni Pratama Sebayang; Julia Ivanna
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i4.9410

Abstract

Village development through the Village Development Planning Meeting (Musrenbangdes) is essentially designed as a participatory mechanism that provides space for communities to determine development priorities according to local needs. However, in practice, the decision-making process is often influenced by elite groups with greater access to information, power, and decision-making forums. This study aims to analyze the process of setting development priorities, identify forms of local elite dominance, and examine their impact on community participation in Musrenbangdes in Bandar Khalipa Village, Deli Serdang Regency. The study used qualitative methods with a descriptive approach to gain an in-depth understanding of the phenomena occurring in the field. The results show that the process of setting development priorities does not fully reflect the principles of participatory development because community involvement is still limited and strategic decisions are mostly determined by the village head, village officials, the Village Consultative Body, and other influential figures. The dominance of local elites is evident in the significant influence of these groups in determining the direction of development and establishing priority programs. This condition has resulted in decreased transparency, reduced representation of community aspirations, and the emergence of a tendency towards apathy in community participation. This research emphasizes the importance of strengthening transparency, accountability, and expanding community involvement so that the Village Development Planning (Musrenbangdes) process can be more democratic, inclusive, and meet the needs of the entire village community.