Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Seri Ilmu Sosial Jurnal Idea Hukum Journal of Law and Legal Reform
Pambudi, Lintang Ario
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Enhancing Efficiency: The Use Of Electronic Signatures In Notarial Deed Siswanta, Anggitariani Rayi Larasati; Pambudi, Lintang Ario; Kupita, Weda; Wakhid, Nur; Legowo, Pramono Suko; Taufiq, Muhammad
Jurnal Idea Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Idea Hukum
Publisher : MIH FH UNSOED

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jih.2024.10.2.529

Abstract

The use of electronic signatures for the parties in the notarial deed is still a matter of debate as to whether its validity is recognized or not. In practice, there are still many notaries who in signing a deed by the parties do not use electronic signatures because there is no clear arrangement regarding electronic signatures in notarial deeds. Therefore, the article will focus on the problem of the concept of electronic signatures that are in accordance with the laws and regulations and the validity of the use of electronic signatures in the partij akta. The research method is normative juridical with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that basically electronic signatures have legal force and legal consequences as long as they meet the requirements regulated in the Electronic Information Electronic Law 2008 (Amendment 2016). However notarial deeds are not allowed to use electronic signatures according to Article 5 of the EIT Law 2008 (Amendment 2016). Notary as state officials must also create efficient public services by following existing technological developments by using electronic signatures to support e-government to create efficient public services. Therefore, the Government must also provide clear legal protection related to electronic signing for the parties in the notarial deed, mainly in the Notary Law and EIT Law.
The Contrarius Actus Principle: Legal Challenges and Prospects for Reform in Executing Administrative Court Decisions Pambudi, Lintang Ario; Hendriana, Rani; Kupita, Weda; Pati, Umi Khaerah
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i2.19655

Abstract

The failure to enforce state administrative court decisions with lasting legal force poses a challenge in Indonesia. Data indicates that merely 15 of 276 state administrative decisions were executed between 2013 and 2019. In 2020, statistics from the KPK, Bawas, and BPKP revealed that implementing state administrative court orders was insufficient, with an average completion rate of 34.92%. The 2021 annual report of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia documented 109 instances of non-compliance with unimplemented decisions. The research uses normative juridical methods with the addition of interviews to support existing data. This article examines the history, application, and challenges of contrarius actus, particularly in implementing state administrative court decisions. This research helps future researchers generate improvements or recommendations for state administrative court decision execution. The results show that contrarius actus originated from Roman law and is now an essential principle in state administrative law. Application of the contrarius actus in Indonesia’s administrative justice law provides for execution mechanisms without an institution or other party specialized in execution; administrative officials themselves must execute court decisions. A significant challenge in applying this principle in Indonesia is the failure of administrative officials to comply with court decisions. Despite the implementation of a merit-based system and elections aimed at selecting officials with integrity and lawfulness in filling administrative positions, many administrative officials violate court orders, making this enforcement of this concept difficult. To address this issue, it is recommended to maximize the role of the Ombudsman and state administrative courts in ensuring that administrative officials comply with legal decisions.
Analisis Kebijakan Cryptocurrency dalam Perspektif Sadd Al-Dzari’ah Ulya, Widadatul; Pambudi, Lintang Ario
Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Seri Ilmu Sosial Vol 5, No 2 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36722/jaiss.v5i2.3013

Abstract

Cryptocurrency masuk dalam kategori kontrak berjangka sehingga dapat menjadi alat investasi. Perkembangan cCryptocurrency selain menciptakan peluang investasi baru tetapi juga menimbulkan masalah ekonomi, berupa kegiatan ekonomi ilegal seperti penghindaran pajak dan pencucian uang. Adanya fatwa MUI tentang hukum cryptocurrency belum menguraikan secara jelas dan lengkap tentang analisis cryptocurrency dalam perspektif sadd al-dzari’ah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia dalam memberikan batasan terhadap transaksi cryptocurrency, serta menganalisis kebijakan cryptocurrency di Indonesia dalam perspektif sadd al-dzari’ah. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Studi Literatur, dengan memanfaatkan sumber data sekunder yang dianalisis dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa legalitas cryptocurrency terbatas pada penggunaannya sebagai komoditas, bukan sebagai alat pembayaran sehingga dapat menjadi objek pajak. Menurut perspektif sadd al-dzari’ah, regulasi cryptocurrency harus komprehensif, detail dan tepat guna agar mampu menutup kerusakan (mafsadah). Tanpa adanya regulasi yang komprehensif dan didukung infrastruktur digital crypto yang mewadahi, transaksi cryptocurrency akan membawa kerusakan ekonomi yang lebih besar. Selaku regulator, pemerintah harus memberikan aturan yang jelas agar transaksi cryptocurrency tidak merugikan berbagai pihak terkait, serta memberikan kemaslahatan masyarakat dalam hal hifz mall.Kata kunci: Cryptocurrency; Menjaga Harta; Sadd Al-Dzari’ah.
QUO VADIS PENGATURAN DISKRESI PEMERINTAH PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA Pambudi, Lintang Ario
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.422

Abstract

The government, in carrying out its duties as a public servant for the welfare of society, sometimes encounters various problems that must be resolved as soon as possible, but there is no legal regulation governing this matter. As a solution to this condition, government officials are given the authority to use discretion in the Government Administration Law. With the passing of the Job Creation Law, the concept of discretion changed which is regulated in the Government Administration Law. The problem is regarding how discretion is regulated after the Job Creation Law and whether this discretion can be used as an object of the lawsuit in the state administrative court. This research is a normative juridical research with a conceptual and statutory approach. The conclusion is that the concept of discretion in the Government Administration Law adheres to the concept of limited discretion, this has been changed by the Job Creation Law which adheres to the concept of discretion broadly by eliminating the requirement that discretion must comply with applicable laws and regulations. Even so, discretion as the object of a lawsuit in the state administrative court can still base a lawsuit that the discretion is contrary to statutory regulations. Suggestions for government officials using discretion must be careful and pay attention to the applicable laws and regulations.
Co-Authors Anggitariani Rayi Larasati Siswanta Hendriana, Rani Muhammad Taufiq Nur Wakhid Pati, Umi Khaerah Pramono Suko Legowo Ulya, Widadatul Weda Kupita