Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.77
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) SIGn Jurnal Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Indonesian Journal of International Law Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Journal of World Trade Studies JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Simbolon, Putu George Matthew
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) Annulment Reform: a Lesson Learned From the World Trade Organization Struggle Simbolon, Putu George Matthew; Allagan, Tiurma Mangihut Pitta
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article expresses how ICSID can learn from the WTO’s current struggles due to the Appellate Body vacuum. To achieve that, this article consists of three discussions. The first discussions analyze the uncertainties caused by the vagueness of International Investment Law’s (IIL) absolute standards, due to the absence of a multilateral investment treaty. The second discussion expresses the elements of the Multi-Party Interim Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA Arrangement) that shall be taken into account by ICSID. The third discussion provides how the current ICSID annulment mechanism shall be reformed. Those issues are answered through doctrinal research in a prescriptive manner. In the first discussion, the IIL’s absolute standards consisting of Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) and Full Protection and Security (FPS) have unclear parameters. Such vagueness is caused by the absence of a multilateral investment agreement. The second discussion explains that ICSID shall transpose the MPIA authority to change its member’s national law. This discussion also presents the consistent practice by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body based on the WTO's substantial rules, as a situation doesn’t exist in IIL. Finally, ICSID needs to expand its annulment scope by ensuring the disputing party’s substantial rights. This article expresses that while it is not the IIL’s duty to unify its material norms due to its dynamic nature, it has to ensure that the disputing parties’ substantial and procedural rights are reasonably taken into account.
Co-Authors Aartje Tehupeiory, Aartje Allagan, Tiurma M. Pitta Allagan, Tiurma Mangihut Pitta Oktavani Yenny Simatupang, Erik Mangajaya Taniady, Vicko Yenny, Oktavani Yusro, Mochammad Abizar