Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Contemporary Educational Perspective: Howard Gardner And Daniel Goleman's Approach In Cultivating Adaptability And Resilience Taryana Taryana; Muh. Safar; Bernardus Agus Rukiyanto; Mustofa Aji Prayitno
International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): February : International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Cult
Publisher : FKIP, Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/ijellacush.v2i1.710

Abstract

Developing adaptability and resilience skills in students is a crucial aspect in preparing them to face the complex dynamics of life. This research explores the contemporary educational perspective with a focus on the approaches of Howard Gardner and Daniel Goleman in shaping students' adaptability and resilience. The literature study method is employed to analyze Gardner's views on Multiple Intelligences and Goleman's Emotional Intelligence concept within the educational context. The analysis highlights the synergies between these two theories in supporting the formation of students' adaptability and resilience in educational environments. The findings of this research are expected to provide practical insights to enhance educational strategies that support holistic development of students' adaptation and resilience across various educational settings. The research results indicate that the integration of both offers a strong foundation for a more comprehensive education, enabling educators to develop strategies that support holistic student growth, not only in academic realms but also in emotional and social aspects. Emphasizing the educator's role as a facilitator and role model in building student resilience, along with the appropriate use of assessments to measure and strengthen resilience, education can create a supportive environment for students to face life's challenges with the confidence and resilience needed.
Curriculum Analysis Of The Character Education System In Indonesia And Finland Mumu Muzayyin Maq; Nasril Nasril; Oktosiyanti Oktosiyanti; Akhmad Ramli; Bernardus Agus Rukiyanto
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1215

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the comparison of character education system curricula in Indonesia and Finland. The focus of the research is to identify differences and similarities in the approach, implementation and effectiveness of character education in the two education systems. The research method used is a literature study with a qualitative approach. Data was collected through reviewing curriculum documents, education policies, and scientific articles related to character education in Indonesia and Finland. The research results show that Finland integrates character education holistically in all aspects of learning, while Indonesia still tends to separate character education as a separate subject. Apart from that, Finland emphasizes the formation of values ​​of independence, responsibility and collaboration through a student-centered approach, while Indonesia places more emphasis on religious values ​​and nationalism. The implication of this research is the need to reorient the character education curriculum in Indonesia to better integrate character values ​​in the entire learning process, as well as adopting best practices from Finland which have been proven effective in shaping students' character.
The Narrative of Pancasila as Indonesia's Moral Identity in Global Politics Bahrul Ulum; Arsy Shakila Putri; Muhammad Zahran Agung Dewantoro; Imam Ragimov; Bernardus Agus Rukiyanto
Jurnal Pelita Raya Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pelita Raya (JPR)
Publisher : Mahkota Science Publishers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65586/jpr.v1i3.32

Abstract

In a global political landscape increasingly defined by the battle of values, narrative power, and moral legitimacy, this study departs from the provocative philosophical premise that Pancasila is not merely an ideological legacy frozen in national rituals, but rather a moral identity that is only meaningful to the extent that it can intervene in injustice, reject dehumanisation, and guide Indonesia to produce a credible ethical position amid the global crises of technology, climate, and identity populism. This study uses a qualitative approach with an interpretive-critical case study design combined with discourse analysis and narrative analysis, as its main objective is to interpret the construction of meaning and moral legitimacy that works through language, symbols, and practices of Indonesian representation in global politics, so that it is not relevant to reduce it to quantitative measurements or linear cause-and-effect testing. The results indicate that the Pancasila narrative can be positioned as Indonesia's moral identity, serving a dual function: strengthening Indonesia's normative legitimacy in global politics while shaping citizens' ethical orientation in responding to value-laden cross-border issues. Pancasila is a deliberate narrative that can be operationalised through public messaging, curriculum, cultural diplomacy, and strategic communication, so that Pancasila is no longer understood as rhetorical legitimacy, but as a tool capable of changing the way citizens interpret patriotism, promoting technological ethics, and mobilising collective action for justice in global issues.