Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.03
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam El-Iqtishady IQTISHOD: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah J-CEKI
Sofyan Al-Hakim
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Trilogy of the Islamic Monetary System; Exploring the Proposits of Naqli as the Theological, Cosmological and Anthropological Basis of the Islamic Monetary System Aris Fauzin; Sofyan Al-Hakim; Iwan Setiawan
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1143

Abstract

This article discusses the Trilogy of Islamic Monetary System with a focus on the exploration of naqli postulates as the theological, cosmological, and anthropological foundations of the Islamic monetary system. In this research, a qualitative descriptive method is used. In this case, the analysis is carried out by digging and exploring the understanding of Islamic principles contained in the Qur'an and As-Sunnah as a guide to building a monetary system that is in accordance with the values of Islamic teachings. The research discussion in this article is focused on three perspectives, namely: Theological, cosmological, and anthropological perspectives. In the theological perspective, this article identifies key concepts such as the principle of tawhidullah, God as the regulator of human sustenance, and obedience to God's law as the foundation for designing a just monetary system. From a cosmological point of view, this research investigates the relationship between the Islamic monetary system and the order of the universe, outlining how the principles of Islamic economics reflect harmony with God's other creatures. Meanwhile, in the anthropological aspect, the article analyses how the Islamic monetary system pays attention to human needs and rights, creating social and economic balance. The study concludes that this trilogy of Islamic monetary system enlightens the importance of understanding and applying naqli postulates in designing a holistic monetary system, encompassing theological, cosmological, and anthropological dimensions to achieve balance and blessings in the economic life of Muslims.
Metodologi Al-Fiqh Al-Muqāran: Pendekatan dan Dampaknya Pada Perbedaan Pendapat Fiqh Wipkil Bashor; Muhammad Furqon Almurni; Sofyan Al-Hakim; Jajang Komaludin; Jajat Sudrajat
IQTISHOD: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : STAI Al-Mas'udiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69768/ji.v4i1.68

Abstract

This research focuses on exploring the methods used by scholars in studying comparative fiqh (al-Fiqh al-Muqāran), the reasons behind differing opinions among them, and the benefits that can be gained from studying comparative fiqh. Utilizing a literature study approach and descriptive analysis, this research reveals that: (1) The process of comparative fiqh is conducted through comparison and critique of contradictory opinions to achieve scientific clarity, which includes weighing, identifying similarities and differences, investigating the reasons for differences, and finding solutions through compromise or selecting the more argumentatively strong opinion. (2) Factors causing differences in opinion among jurists include differences in qirā’ah (recitations), irāb (grammatical inflection), ḥadīth narrations, text interpretation, sources of legal deduction (istinbāṯ), and methods of integrating and prioritizing contradictory evidence. (3) The benefits of studying al Fiqh al Muqāran include understanding the basic principles of fiqh schools, the ijtihad approach of the jurists, their method of legal reasoning (istinbāt), and their critique of evidence. Additionally, this study aids in developing fiqh skills, expanding the understanding of ijtihad and its flexibility, understanding the ethics of scholars in dealing with differing opinions to reach the truth, and appreciating the strong foundations behind these differences. This research offers significant insights into the importance of comparative fiqh in enriching Islamic understanding, valuing diversity of opinion, and promoting an attitude of tolerance and respect in the discourse of Islamic scholarship.
Implementasi Akad Bai’ al-‘Inah Dalam Praktek Ekonomi Islam Di Malaysia Perpektif Ulama Kontemporer Aulia Nurhikmah; Farid Madani; Muhammad Fauzan Januri; Sofyan Al-Hakim
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 5: Agustus 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i5.10686

Abstract

Akad Bai’ al-‘Inah merupakan salah satu bentuk transaksi jual beli dalam Islam yang bertujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan likuiditas tanpa melanggar prinsip larangan riba. Akad ini melibatkan dua transaksi: penjualan suatu barang oleh penjual kepada pembeli secara tunai, kemudian pembeli menjual kembali barang tersebut kepada penjual semula secara cicilan atau kredit dengan harga yang lebih tinggi. Meskipun bentuknya dianggap sah oleh sebagian ulama, akad ini tetap menimbulkan kontroversi karena substansinya menyerupai pinjaman berbunga. Di Malaysia, Bai’ al-‘Inah telah diimplementasikan secara luas dalam industri keuangan Islam, terutama oleh lembaga perbankan sebagai instrumen pembiayaan pribadi dan modal kerja. Implementasi modern di Malaysia menunjukkan adanya regulasi ketat dari Bank Negara Malaysia serta Dewan Syariah Nasional guna memastikan praktik ini sesuai dengan maqasid al-shariah. Studi ini menganalisis secara kritis penerapan akad Bai’ al-‘Inah di Malaysia, dengan fokus pada relevansi, keabsahan, serta tantangan etis dalam praktik kontemporernya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi deskriptif-normatif dilihat dari aspek literatur dan telaah fatwa serta kebijakan regulator sebagai sumber utama. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat pembenaran syariah, sebagian pihak masih mempertanyakan keaslian tujuan syariah dalam praktik akad ini di era modern.
Kritik Metodologis dan Substansial terhadap Perbandingan Hukum Kontrak Antara Hukum Islam dan Hukum Indonesia: Methodological and Substantial Criticism of the Comparison of Contract Law Between Islamic Law and Indonesian Law Imron Rosadi; Sofyan Al-Hakim
BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bustanul.v6i3.2309

Abstract

This study critically examines Atharyanshah Pueri's article on the comparison of Islamic contract law and Indonesian law, against the background of the importance of high methodological standards in the study of comparative law, especially in the context of Indonesian legal pluralism. The approach of this study uses normative legal techniques and critical analysis, with a comparative methodology evaluation framework based on contemporary comparative legal theory. Meta-analysis techniques were used to assess the methodological framework, quality of argumentation, and engagement with primary sources and relevant literature. The study found that Puneri's article has significant methodological weaknesses, such as the absence of a clear comparative framework, limitations in the use of primary sources, lack of contextualization, and superficial substance analysis of both Islamic contract law and Indonesian law. The article also fails to identify the comparative tertiums that are essential for comparative studies. These weaknesses demonstrate the urgency of developing a more rigorous comparative legal research methodology, including the application of functional theoretical frameworks, the integration of case studies, and contextual analysis that includes socio-economic dynamics. This constructive academic criticism is expected to spur the improvement of the quality of legal research in Indonesia with international academic standards.
Co-Authors Aris Fauzin Asep Dadang Hidayat Aulia Nurhikmah Chandra Dodi Yarli Farid Madani Ikhsan, Muhammad Miftahul Imron Rosadi Iwan Setiawan Jaih Mubarok Jajang Herawan Jajang Komaludin Jajat sudrajat Moh. Asep Zakariya Ansori Mugni Muhit Muhammad Fauzan Januri Muhammad Furqon Almurni Royani Shofya Humaira Siti Salma Suradi Wipkil Bashor Yadi Janwari