Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Infolitika Journal of Data Science

Advanced Anemia Classification Using Comprehensive Hematological Profiles and Explainable Machine Learning Approaches Noviandy, Teuku Rizky; Idroes, Ghifari Maulana; Suhendra, Rivansyah; Bakri, Tedy Kurniawan; Idroes, Rinaldi
Infolitika Journal of Data Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : Heca Sentra Analitika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60084/ijds.v2i2.237

Abstract

Anemia is a common health issue with serious clinical effects, making timely and accurate diagnosis essential to prevent complications. This study explores the use of machine learning (ML) methods to classify anemia and its subtypes using detailed hematological data. Six ML models were tested: Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbors. The dataset was preprocessed using feature standardization and the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance. Gradient Boosting delivered the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and F1-score, establishing itself as the top-performing model. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to enhance model interpretability, identifying key predictive features. This study highlights the potential of explainable ML to develop efficient, accurate, and scalable tools for anemia diagnosis, fostering improved healthcare outcomes globally.
Inductive Biases in Feature Reduction for QSAR: SHAP vs. Autoencoders Noviandy, Teuku Rizky; Idroes, Ghifari Maulana; Lala, Andi; Helwani, Zuchra; Idroes, Rinaldi
Infolitika Journal of Data Science Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): May 2025
Publisher : Heca Sentra Analitika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60084/ijds.v3i1.306

Abstract

Machine learning models in drug discovery often depend on high-dimensional molecular descriptors, many of which may be redundant or irrelevant. Reducing these descriptors is essential for improving model performance, interpretability, and computational efficiency. This study compares two widely used reduction strategies: SHAP-based feature selection and autoencoder-based compression, within the context of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) classification. LightGBM is used as a consistent modeling framework to evaluate models trained on all descriptors, the top 50 and 100 SHAP-ranked descriptors, and a 64-dimensional autoencoder embedding. The results show that SHAP-based selection produces interpretable and stable models with minimal performance loss, particularly when using the top 100 descriptors. In contrast, the autoencoder achieves the highest test performance by capturing nonlinear patterns in a compact, low-dimensional representation, although this comes at the cost of interpretability and consistency across data splits. These findings reflect the differing inductive biases of each method. SHAP prioritizes sparsity and attribution, while autoencoders focus on reconstruction and continuity. The analysis emphasizes that descriptor reduction strategies are not interchangeable. SHAP-based selection is suitable for applications where interpretability and reliability are essential, such as in hypothesis-driven or regulatory settings. Autoencoders are more appropriate for performance-driven tasks, including virtual screening. The choice of reduction strategy should be guided not only by performance metrics but also by the specific modeling requirements and assumptions relevant to cheminformatics workflows.